Essentials: Understanding & Healing the Mind | Dr. Karl Deisseroth
Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials, where we revisit past episodes for the most potent and actionable science-based tools for mental health, physical health, and performance.
欢迎来到 Huberman Lab Essentials,在这里我们回顾过去的剧集,寻找针对心理健康、身体健康和表现的最有效、最可操作的基于科学的工具。
And now my conversation with Dr. Karl Deisseroth.
现在是我与 Karl Deisseroth 博士的对话。
Well, thanks for being here.
嗯,谢谢你来到这里。
Thanks for having me.
谢谢你有我。
So for people that might not be so familiar with the fields of neuroscience, et cetera, what is the difference between neurology and psychiatry?
那么,对于那些可能不太熟悉神经科学等领域的人来说,神经病学和精神病学之间有什么区别?
Psychiatry focuses on disorders where we can't see something that's physically wrong, where we don't have a measurable, where there's no blood test that makes the diagnosis, there's no brain scan that tells us this is schizophrenia, this is depression for an individual patient.
精神病学关注的是那些我们看不到身体上的问题的疾病,我们没有可测量的东西,没有血液测试来做出诊断,没有脑部扫描告诉我们这是精神分裂症,这是个体患者的抑郁症。
And so psychiatry is much more mysterious, and the only tools we have are words.
因此,精神病学更加神秘,我们唯一拥有的工具就是语言。
Neurologists are fantastic physicians.
神经科医生是出色的医生。
They see the stroke on brain scans.
他们通过脑部扫描看到中风。
They see the seizure, and the pre-seizure activity with an EEG, and they can measure and treat based on those measurables.
他们通过脑电图观察癫痫发作和癫痫发作前的活动,并且可以根据这些可测量值进行测量和治疗。
In psychiatry, we have a harder job.
在精神病学领域,我们的工作更加艰巨。
We use words.
我们使用文字。
We have rating scales for symptoms.
我们有症状评定量表。
We can measure depression and autism with rating scales.
我们可以用评级量表来衡量抑郁症和自闭症。
But those are words, still.
但这些仍然是文字。
And ultimately, that's what psychiatry is built around.
最终,这就是精神病学的基础。
It's an odd situation because we've got the most complex, beautiful, mysterious, incredibly engineered object in the universe.
这是一个奇怪的情况,因为我们拥有宇宙中最复杂、最美丽、最神秘、最令人难以置信的工程物体。
And yet, all we have are words to find our way in.
然而,我们所拥有的只是话语。
So do you find that if a patient is very verbal or hyperverbal that you have an easier time diagnosing them as opposed to somebody who's more quiet and reserved?
那么,您是否发现,如果患者言语非常多或言语过多,那么您比那些更安静和保守的患者更容易诊断他们?
Or, I could imagine the opposite might be true as well.
或者,我可以想象相反的情况也可能成立。
Well, because we only have words, you put your finger on a key point.
好吧,因为我们只有文字,所以你把手指放在一个关键点上。
If they don't speak that much in principle, it's harder.
如果原则上他们不说那么多,那就更难了。
The lack of speech can be a symptom.
缺乏言语可能是一种症状。
We can see that in depression.
我们可以在抑郁症中看到这一点。
We can see that in the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
我们可以在精神分裂症的阴性症状中看到这一点。
We can see that in autism sometimes by itself that is a symptom of a reduced speech.
我们可以看到,在自闭症中,有时这本身就是言语减少的症状。
But ultimately, you do need something.
但最终,你确实需要一些东西。
You need some words to help guide you.
你需要一些话语来帮助指导你。
And that in fact, there's challenges that I can tell you about where patients with depression who are so depressed they can't speak.
事实上,我可以告诉你一些挑战,抑郁症患者抑郁得无法说话。
That makes it a bit of a challenge to distinguish depression from some of the other reasons they might not be speaking.
这使得将抑郁症与他们可能不说话的其他一些原因区分开来有点困难。
And this is the art and the science of psychiatry.
这就是精神病学的艺术和科学。
Do you think we will ever have a blood test for depression or schizophrenia or autism?
您认为我们会对抑郁症、精神分裂症或自闭症进行血液检查吗?
And would that be a good or a bad thing?
这是好事还是坏事?
I think ultimately there will be quantitative tests already.
我认为最终将会有定量测试。
Efforts are being made to look at certain rhythms in the brain, using external EEGs to look at brain waves effectively.
人们正在努力观察大脑中的某些节律,使用外部脑电图来有效地观察脑电波。
But ultimately, what's going on in the brain in psychiatric disease is physical.
但归根结底,精神疾病的大脑中发生的事情是身体上的。
And it's due to the circuits and the connections and the projections and the brain that are not working as they would in a typical situation.
这是由于电路、连接、投射和大脑没有像典型情况下那样工作。
And I do think we'll have those measurables at some point.
我确实认为我们会在某个时候拥有这些可衡量的指标。
Could it be abused or misused, certainly but that's, I think, true for all of medicine.
它肯定会被滥用或误用,但我认为这对于所有医学都是如此。
I want to know, and I'm sure there are several, but what do you see as the biggest challenge facing psychiatry and the treatment of mental illness today?
我想知道,而且我确信有几个,但您认为当今精神病学和精神疾病治疗面临的最大挑战是什么?
I think we have-- we're making progress on what the biggest challenge, which I think there's still such a strong stigma for psychiatric disease that patients often don't come to us.
我认为我们在最大的挑战上正在取得进展,我认为精神疾病仍然存在如此强烈的耻辱,以至于患者常常不会来找我们。
And they feel that they should be able to handle this on their own, and that can slow treatment.
他们觉得自己应该能够自己处理这个问题,这会减慢治疗速度。
It can lead to worsening symptoms.
它可能导致症状恶化。
We know, for example, patients who have untreated anxiety issues, if you go for a year or more with a serious, untreated anxiety issue, that can convert to depression.
例如,我们知道,患有未经治疗的焦虑问题的患者,如果您患有严重的、未经治疗的焦虑问题一年或更长时间,可能会转化为抑郁症。
You can add another problem on top of the anxiety.
除了焦虑之外,你还可以添加另一个问题。
And so it would be-- why do people not come for treatment?
那么,为什么人们不来接受治疗呢?
They feel like this is something they should be able to master on their own, which can be true, but usually, some help is a good thing.
他们觉得这是他们应该能够自己掌握的东西,这可能是真的,但通常来说,一些帮助是一件好事。
That raises a question related to something I heard you say many years ago at a lecture, which was that this was a scientific lecture.
这就提出了一个与我多年前听你在一次讲座中说过的话相关的问题,那就是这是一场科学讲座。
And you said, we don't know how other people feel.
你说,我们不知道其他人的感受。
Most of the time, we don't even really know how we feel.
大多数时候,我们甚至不知道自己的感受如何。
I mean, you could elaborate on that a little bit.
我的意思是,你可以详细说明一下。
And the dearth of ways that we have to talk about feelings.
我们缺乏谈论感受的方式。
I mean, there are so many words.
我的意思是,有这么多字。
I don't know how many but I'm guessing there are more than a dozen words to describe the state that I call sadness.
我不知道有多少个,但我猜有十多个词来形容我称之为悲伤的状态。
But as far as I understand, we don't have any way of comparing that in a real objective sense.
但据我了解,我们没有任何方法可以真正客观地进行比较。
So how, as a psychiatrist, when your job is to use words to diagnose words of the patient, to diagnose, do you maneuver around that?
那么,作为一名精神科医生,当你的工作是用语言来诊断患者的语言时,你会如何应对呢?
And what is this landscape that we call feelings or emotions?
我们称之为感受或情感的景观是什么?
This is a really interesting.
这真是一个有趣的事情。
Here, we have there's a tension between the words that we've built up in the clinic that mean something to the physicians, and then there's the colloquial use of words that may not be the same.
在这里,我们在诊所建立的对医生有意义的词语之间存在着紧张关系,而口语中使用的词语可能并不相同。
And so that's the first level we have to out when someone says, I'm depressed.
因此,当有人说“我很沮丧”时,我们必须首先解决这个问题。
What exactly do they mean by that?
他们这到底是什么意思?
That may be different from what we're talking about in terms of depression.
这可能与我们谈论的抑郁症不同。
So part of psychiatry is to get beyond that word and to get into how they're actually feeling, get rid of the jargon and get to real-world examples of how they're feeling.
因此,精神病学的一部分就是超越这个词,了解他们的实际感受,摆脱行话,找到他们感受的真实例子。
So how much do you look forward into the future?
那么您对未来有多少期待?
How much hope do you have?
你还有多少希望?
How much planning are you doing for the future?
你对未来做了多少规划?
So these here now you're getting into actual things you can talk about that are unambiguous.
因此,现在您正在讨论可以明确谈论的实际事情。
If someone says, yeah, I can't even I can't even think about tomorrow, I don't see how I'm going to get to tomorrow.
如果有人说,是的,我什至无法想象明天,我不知道我将如何走向明天。
That's a nice, precise thing that it's sad.
这是一件美好而精确的事情,但令人悲伤。
It's tragic.
真是悲剧。
But it's also that means something, and we know what that means.
但这也意味着一些东西,我们知道那意味着什么。
That's the hopelessness symptom of depression.
这就是抑郁症的绝望症状。
And that is what I try to do when I do a psychiatric interview.
这就是我在进行精神病学访谈时尝试做的事情。
I try to get past the jargon and get to what's actually happening in the patient's life and in their mind.
我试图摆脱行话,了解患者生活中和他们的想法中实际发生的事情。
But as you say, ultimately, this shows up across-- I address this issue every day in my life, whether it's in the lab where we're looking at animals, whether fish or mice or rats, and studying their behavior, or when I'm in a conversation with just a friend or a colleague, or when I'm talking to a patient, I never really know what's going on inside the mind of the other person.
但正如你所说,最终,这会出现在我的生活中每天都会遇到这个问题,无论是在实验室里观察动物,无论是鱼还是老鼠,并研究它们的行为,或者当我与朋友或同事交谈时,或者当我与病人交谈时,我永远不知道对方的内心在想什么。
I get some feedback, and I get words.
我得到一些反馈,我得到话语。
I get behaviors.
我得到了行为。
I get actions.
我得到行动。
But I never really know.
但我从来不知道。
Are there any very good treatments for psychiatric disease?
对于精神疾病有什么非常好的治疗方法吗?
Meaning are there currently any pills, potions, forms of communication that reliably work every time or work in most patients?
这意味着目前是否有任何药丸、药水、交流方式每次都能可靠地起作用或对大多数患者有效?
And could you give a couple of examples of great successes of psychiatry if they exist?
您能否举几个精神病学取得巨大成功的例子(如果存在的话)?
Yes, in psychiatry, despite the depths of the mystery we struggle with, many of our treatments are actually-- we may be doing better than some other specialties in terms of actually causing therapeutic benefit for patients.
是的,在精神病学中,尽管我们与谜团的深度作斗争,但我们的许多治疗实际上——在实际为患者带来治疗益处方面,我们可能比其他一些专业做得更好。
We do help patients, the patients who suffer from, by the way, both medications and talk therapy have been shown to be extremely effective in many cases have, for example, people with panic disorder.
我们确实帮助患者,顺便说一句,药物治疗和谈话疗法在许多情况下都被证明非常有效,例如患有恐慌症的人。
Cognitive behavioral therapy, just working with words, helping people identify the early signs of when they're starting to move toward a panic attack, what are the cognitions that are happening.
认知行为疗法,仅用言语来帮助人们识别何时开始恐慌发作的早期迹象,以及正在发生的认知。
You can train people to derail that, and you can very potently treat panic disorder that way.
你可以训练人们摆脱这种情况,这样你就可以非常有效地治疗恐慌症。
There are many psychiatric medications that are very effective for the conditions that they're treating anti-psychotic medications, they have side effects, but boy, do they work.
有许多精神科药物对于治疗抗精神病药物的病症非常有效,它们有副作用,但是天哪,它们有效吗?
They really can clear up auditory hallucinations, the paranoia.
它们确实可以消除幻听、偏执。
And then, this is a frustrating and yet heartening aspect of psychiatry.
然后,这是精神病学令人沮丧但又令人振奋的方面。
There are treatments like electroconvulsive therapy, which is where it's extremely effective for depression.
有一些治疗方法,例如电休克疗法,对抑郁症非常有效。
We have patients who nothing else works for them, or they can't tolerate medications.
我们有些患者对其他药物均无效,或者无法耐受药物治疗。
And you can administer under a very safe, controlled condition where the patient's body is not moving.
您可以在非常安全、受控的条件下进行治疗,患者的身体不会移动。
They're put into a very safe situation where the body doesn't move or sees.
他们被置于一个非常安全的环境中,身体无法移动或看到。
It's just an internal process that's triggered in the brain.
这只是大脑触发的内部过程。
This is an extraordinarily effective treatment for treatment resistant depression.
这是治疗难治性抑郁症的一种非常有效的治疗方法。
At the same time, I find it as heartening as it is to see patients respond to this with who have severe depression.
与此同时,我发现看到患有严重抑郁症的患者对此做出反应同样令人振奋。
I'm also frustrated by it.
我也为此感到沮丧。
Why can't we do something more precise than this for these very severe cases.
对于这些非常严重的情况,我们为什么不能做一些比这更精确的事情呢?
In all of these cases, though, in psychiatry, the frustrating thing is that we don't have the level of understanding that a cardiologist has in thinking about the heart.
然而,在所有这些情况下,在精神病学中,令人沮丧的是我们没有心脏病专家对心脏的理解水平。
The heart is-- we now know it's a pump, it's pumping blood.
心脏是——我们现在知道它是一个泵,它泵送血液。
And so you can look at everything about how it's working or not working in terms of that frame.
因此,您可以根据该框架查看有关它如何工作或不工作的所有内容。
It's clearly a pump.
很明显这是一个泵。
We don't really have that level of what is the circuit really there for in psychiatry.
我们还没有真正了解精神病学中电路的真正用途。
What are the pieces that are going to be required to cure autism, cure Parkinson's cure schizophrenia?
治愈自闭症、帕金森氏症和精神分裂症需要哪些措施?
I would imagine there are several elements and bins here, understanding that the natural biology, understanding what the activity patterns are, how to modify those.
我想象这里有几个元素和容器,了解自然生物学,了解活动模式是什么,以及如何修改它们。
Maybe you could just tell us what you think.
也许你可以告诉我们你的想法。
What is the bento box of the perfect cure?
什么是完美治愈的便当盒?
Yeah, I think the first thing we need is understanding what is the element in the brain that's analogous to the pumping heart.
是的,我认为我们首先需要了解大脑中类似于跳动心脏的元素是什么。
When we think about the symptoms of depression, that's maybe we think about motivation and dopamine neurons.
当我们想到抑郁症的症状时,我们可能会想到动机和多巴胺神经元。
And so then, that turns our attention as neuroscientists we think, OK, let's think about the parts of the brain that are involved in dealing with merging complex data streams that are very high in bit rate, that need to be fused together into a unitary concept.
那么,这将我们的注意力转向神经科学家,我们认为,好吧,让我们考虑一下大脑中参与处理合并复杂数据流的部分,这些数据流的比特率非常高,需要融合在一起形成一个统一的概念。
And that starts to guide us and maybe we can-- and we know other animals are social in their own way, and we can study those animals.
这开始指导我们,也许我们可以——而且我们知道其他动物以自己的方式进行社交,我们可以研究这些动物。
And so that's how I think about it.
这就是我的想法。
There's hope for the future, thinking about the symptoms as an engineer might and trying to identify the circuits that are likely working to make this typical behavior happen.
未来充满希望,像工程师一样思考症状,并尝试识别可能导致这种典型行为发生的电路。
And that will help us understand how it becomes atypical.
这将帮助我们理解它是如何变得非典型的。
We need to know the circuits.
我们需要了解电路。
We need to know the cells in the various brain regions and portions of the body and how they connect to one another and what the patterns of activity are under a normal, quote unquote, "healthy interaction." If we understand that, then it seems that the next step, which of course, could be carried out in parallel.
我们需要了解大脑各个区域和身体各部分的细胞,以及它们如何相互连接,以及在正常的“健康互动”下的活动模式是什么。如果我们理解这一点,那么下一步似乎可以并行进行。
That work can be done alongside work where various elements within those circuits are tweaked just right, like the tuning of a piano in the subtle way or maybe even the replacement of a whole set of keys if the piano is lacking keys, so to speak.
这项工作可以与对这些电路中的各种元素进行恰到好处的调整的工作一起完成,例如以微妙的方式调整钢琴,或者甚至可以说,如果钢琴缺少琴键,则可以更换整套琴键。
In 2015, there was this what I thought was a very nice article published in The New Yorker describing your work and the current state of your work in the laboratory and the clinic and an interaction with a patient, so as I recall, a woman who was severely depressed, and you reported in that article some of the discussion with this patient and then, in real time, increase the activation of the so-called vagus nerve, this 10th cranial nerve that extends out of the skull and innervates many of the viscera and body.
2015 年,《纽约客》上发表了一篇我认为非常好的文章,描述了您的工作以及您在实验室和诊所的工作现状以及与患者的互动,我记得,一位患有严重抑郁症的女性,您在那篇文章中报道了与该患者的一些讨论,然后实时增加了所谓的迷走神经的激活,这是第 10 脑神经,从头骨延伸出来,支配大脑的许多神经。内脏和身体。
What is the potential for channelrhodopsins or related types of algae engineering to be used to manipulate the vagus?
视紫红质通道蛋白或相关类型的藻类工程用于操纵迷走神经的潜力有多大?
Because I believe, in that instance, it wasn't channel opsin stimulation.
因为我相信,在这种情况下,这不是通道视蛋白刺激。
It was electrical stimulation or to manipulate, for instance, a very small localized region of the brain.
例如,它是电刺激或操纵大脑的一个非常小的局部区域。
Let me reframe it a little bit differently in light of what we were talking about a couple of minutes ago, my understanding is that if somebody has severe depression and they take any number of the available pharmaceutical agents that are out there, SSRIs, serotoninergic agents increased, dopamine increased, whatever that sometimes they experience relief, but they're often serious side effects.
让我根据几分钟前讨论的内容稍微改变一下,我的理解是,如果有人患有严重抑郁症,他们服用任何数量的可用药物,SSRIs、血清素能药物增加、多巴胺增加,无论什么有时他们会感到缓解,但它们通常是严重的副作用。
Sometimes they don't experience relief.
有时他们并没有感受到解脱。
But as I understand it, channel opsins and their related technologies, in principle, would allow you to turn on or off the specific regions of the brain that lead to depressive symptoms, or maybe you turn up a happiness circuit or a positive anticipation circuit.
但据我了解,通道视蛋白及其相关技术原则上可以让你打开或关闭导致抑郁症状的大脑特定区域,或者你可以打开幸福回路或积极预期回路。
Where are we at now in terms of bringing this technology to the nervous system?
在将这项技术引入神经系统方面,我们现在处于什么阶段?
And let's start with the body and then move into the skull.
让我们从身体开始,然后进入头骨。
Yeah, so starting with the body is a good example because it highlights the opportunity and how far we have to go.
是的,所以从身体开始是一个很好的例子,因为它强调了机会以及我们必须走多远。
So let's take this example of vagus nerve stimulation.
让我们以迷走神经刺激为例。
So the vagus nerve, it's the 10th cranial nerve.
迷走神经,它是第十脑神经。
It comes from the brain.
它来自大脑。
It goes down it innervates the heart innervates the gut.
它下降会刺激心脏,刺激肠道。
And by innervate, I means it sends little connections down to help guide what happens in these organs in the abdomen and chest.
我所说的神经支配是指它向下发送很少的连接,以帮助指导腹部和胸部这些器官发生的情况。
It also collects information back, and there's information coming back from all those organs that go also go through this vagus nerve, the 10th cranial nerve, back to the brain.
它还会收集返回的信息,所有这些器官都会返回信息,这些器官也会通过迷走神经(第十脑神经)返回大脑。
And so this is somewhat of a superhighway to the brain.
所以这在某种程度上是通往大脑的高速公路。
Then, it was the idea.
然后,这就是这个想法。
And maybe the idea is maybe we could put a little cuff, a little electrical device around the vagus nerve itself, so a way of getting into the brain without putting something physical into the brain.
也许我们的想法是,我们可以在迷走神经周围放置一个小袖带、一个小电子装置,这样就可以在不向大脑中放入任何物理物质的情况下进入大脑。
And why the vagus?
为什么会出现迷走神经?
I mean, it's there, and it's accessible.
我的意思是,它就在那里,而且可以访问。
That's the reason.
这就是原因。
That's the reason?
是这个原因吗?
That's the reason, yes.
这就是原因,是的。
Really?
真的吗?
Yeah.
是的。
You're not kidding?
你没开玩笑吧?
I'm not kidding.
我不是在开玩笑。
So stimulating the vagus to treat depression simply because it's accessible?
那么刺激迷走神经来治疗抑郁症仅仅是因为它容易实现吗?
It started as actually as an epilepsy treatment.
它实际上是作为一种癫痫治疗开始的。
And it can help with epilepsy.
它可以帮助治疗癫痫。
But the vagus nerve lands on a particular spot on the brain called the solitary tract nucleus, which is just one synapse away from the serotonin and dopamine and norepinephrine.
但迷走神经落在大脑上一个称为孤束核的特定位置,它距离血清素、多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素仅一个突触。
So there's a link to chemical systems in the brain that make it a rational choice?
那么这与大脑中的化学系统有联系,使其成为理性的选择吗?
Yes, it's not.
是的,不是。
It's not irrational.
这并非不合理。
But I can tell you that even if that were not true, the same thing would have been tried.
但我可以告诉你,即使那不是真的,也会尝试同样的事情。
You would have done it anyway.
无论如何你都会这么做的。
Because it's accessible.
因为它触手可及。
Yeah, I see.
是的,我明白了。
How do you think it's working when it does work?
当它起作用时,你认为它的效果如何?
Is it triggering the activation of neurons that release more serotonin or dopamine?
它是否会触发神经元的激活,释放更多的血清素或多巴胺?
It could be, but I would say we don't have evidence for that.
有可能,但我想说我们没有证据证明这一点。
And so I just don't know.
所以我就是不知道。
But what is clear is that it's dose-limited in how high and strongly we can stimulate, and why?
但显而易见的是,我们可以刺激的高度和强度是受到剂量限制的,为什么呢?
It's because it's an electrode and it's stimulating everything nearby.
这是因为它是一个电极,它会刺激附近的一切。
And when you turn on the vagus nerve stimulator, the voice patient's voice becomes strangulated and hoarse.
而当你打开迷走神经刺激器时,声音患者的声音就会变得压抑、沙哑。
They can have trouble swallowing.
他们可能有吞咽困难。
They can have trouble speaking, for sure, even some trouble breathing because everything in the neck, every electrically responsive cell and projection in the neck is being affected by this electrode.
当然,他们可能会出现说话困难,甚至呼吸困难,因为脖子上的所有东西、每个电敏感细胞和脖子上的突起都受到这个电极的影响。
And so you can go up just so far with the intensity, and then you have to stop.
所以你的强度可以上升到一定程度,然后你就必须停下来。
So to your initial question, could a more precise stimulation method like optogenetics help in this setting?
那么,对于你最初的问题,像光遗传学这样更精确的刺激方法可以在这种情况下有所帮助吗?
In principle, it could, because that if you would target the light sensitivity to just the right kind of cell, let's say cell x that goes from point A to point B that you know causes symptom relief of a particular kind, then you're in business.
原则上是可以的,因为如果你将光敏感性瞄准正确类型的细胞,比如说从 A 点到 B 点的细胞 x,你知道它会导致某种特定类型的症状缓解,那么你就成功了。
You can have that be the only cell that's light sensitive.
你可以让它成为唯一对光敏感的细胞。
You're not going to affect any of the other cells, the larynx and the pharynx and the projections passing through.
你不会影响任何其他细胞、喉部和咽部以及穿过的突出物。
So that's the hope.
这就是希望。
That's the opportunity.
这就是机会。
The problem, is that we don't yet have that level of specific knowledge.
问题是我们还没有达到那种程度的具体知识。
We don't know, OK, it's the cell starting in point A going to point B that relieves this particular cell.
我们不知道,好吧,是从 A 点开始到 B 点的细胞减轻了这个特定细胞的负担。
We want to fix this key on the piano.
我们想把这个键固定在钢琴上。
Yeah.
是的。
I'm imagining a little tiny blue light emitting thing object that's a little bigger than a clump of cells or maybe about the size of a clump of cells.
我正在想象一个微小的发出蓝光的物体,它比细胞团大一点,或者大约是细胞团的大小。
So we're talking about a little tiny stamp, each edge half a millimeter in size.
所以我们谈论的是一个很小的邮票,每个边缘只有半毫米大小。
I could imagine that being put under my skin.
我可以想象那是在我的皮肤下。
And then I would-- what?
然后我会——什么?
I'd hit an app on my phone, and I'd say.
我会说,我会在手机上打开一个应用程序。
I'd say, Dr. Deisseroth, I'm not feeling great today.
我想说,Deisseroth 博士,我今天感觉不太好。
Can I increase the stimulation?
可以增加刺激吗?
And he said, go for it.
他说,去做吧。
And then, I ramp it up.
然后,我加大力度。
Is that how it would go?
事情就这样发展吗?
I mean, that's effectively what we already do with the vagus nerve stimulation.
我的意思是,这实际上就是我们已经对迷走神经刺激所做的事情。
The doctor in this case, and I have this in some of my patients in the clinic, I do vagus nerve stimulation.
在这个病例中,我的医生和我在诊所的一些患者身上都有这种情况,我会进行迷走神经刺激。
I talk to them.
我和他们说话。
I say how I go through the symptoms.
我说说我是如何经历这些症状的。
I use the psychiatric interview to elicit their internal states.
我通过精神病学访谈来了解他们的内心状态。
And then, I have a radio frequency controller that I can dial in.
然后,我有一个可以拨入的射频控制器。
Right there in real time?
实时就在那里?
Right there in real time.
实时就在那里。
You're holding the remote control essentially to their brain, although it's remote remote control.
尽管它是远程控制,但本质上你是在将遥控器握在他们的大脑上。
Through a couple steps, but yeah.
经过几个步骤,但是是的。
Yeah, yeah.
是啊是啊。
And I can turn up the frequency.
我可以调高频率。
I can turn up the intensity all with the radio frequency and control, and then it's reprogrammed or reduced, and then the patient can then leave at this altered dose.
我可以通过射频和控制来调高强度,然后重新编程或降低强度,然后患者可以按照改变的剂量离开。
In most patients, I don't expect an immediate mood change.
对于大多数患者,我预计情绪不会立即改变。
What I do is I increase the dose until a next level up while asking the patient for side effects.
我所做的就是增加剂量直到下一个级别,同时询问患者副作用。
Can you still breathe?
你还能呼吸吗?
OK.
好的。
Can you still swallow?
还能吞吗?
OK.
好的。
And I can hear their voice as well.
我也能听到他们的声音。
And I can get a sense.
我能感觉到。
And you're looking at their face?
你在看他们的脸吗?
And I'm looking at their face.
我正在看着他们的脸。
And so I can get a sense, is there a-- am I in a still in a safe side effect regime?
这样我就能感觉到,我是否仍处于安全的副作用状态?
And then, I stop at a particular point that looks safe, and then the patient goes home, comes back and months later, and I get the report on how things were over that month.
然后,我在一个看起来安全的特定点停下来,然后病人回家,几个月后回来,我得到有关该月情况的报告。
That's very exciting.
这非常令人兴奋。
What are your thoughts about brain machine interface?
您对脑机接口有何看法?
Is something that's been happening for a long time now, devices, little probes that are going to stimulate different patterns of activity and ensembles of neurons.
这是已经发生很长时间的事情了,设备、小探针将刺激不同的活动模式和神经元群。
First of all, it's an amazing scientific discovery approach.
首先,这是一种令人惊叹的科学发现方法。
As you mentioned, we and others here at Stanford are using electrodes, collecting information from tens of thousands of neurons, even separate from the Neuralink work.
正如你提到的,我们和斯坦福大学的其他人正在使用电极,从数以万计的神经元收集信息,甚至与 Neuralink 的工作分开。
As you point out, many people have been doing this in humans as well as in non-human primates.
正如您所指出的,许多人已经在人类和非人类灵长类动物身上进行了这种研究。
And this is pretty powerful.
这非常强大。
It's important this will let us understand what's going on in the brain in psychiatric disease and neurological disease and will give us ideas for treatment.
重要的是,这将使我们了解精神疾病和神经系统疾病的大脑发生了什么,并为我们提供治疗思路。
I see that as something that will be part of psychiatry in the long run.
我认为从长远来看这将成为精神病学的一部分。
Already, with deep brain stimulation approaches, we can help people with psychiatric disorders, and that's putting just a single electrode, not even a complex closed-loop system where you're both playing in and getting information back.
通过深度脑刺激方法,我们已经可以帮助患有精神疾病的人,而这只需放置一个电极,甚至不需要一个复杂的闭环系统,您可以在其中玩耍并获取信息。
Even just a single stimulation electrode in the brain can help people with OCD, for example, quite powerfully.
例如,即使大脑中只有一个刺激电极也可以非常有效地帮助患有强迫症的人。
One of the questions I get asked a lot is about ADHD and attention deficit of various kinds.
我经常被问到的问题之一是关于注意力缺陷多动症和各种注意力缺陷。
I have the hunch that one reason I get asked so often is that people are feeling really distracted and challenged in funneling their attention and their behavior, and there are a number of reasons for that, of course.
我有预感,我经常被问到的原因之一是,人们在集中注意力和行为方面感到非常心烦意乱和面临挑战,当然,造成这种情况的原因有很多。
But what is true ADHD?
但什么是真正的多动症?
And what does it look like?
它是什么样子的?
What can be done for it?
可以为此做些什么呢?
And what, if any, role for channel opsins or these downstream technologies that you're developing?
如果有的话,通道视蛋白或您正在开发的这些下游技术的作用是什么?
What do they-- what do they offer for people that suffer from ADHD or have a family member that suffers from ADHD?
他们为患有多动症的人或有患有多动症的家庭成员提供什么?
Yeah, this is a pretty interesting branch of psychiatry.
是的,这是精神病学的一个非常有趣的分支。
There's no question that people have been helped by the treatments.
毫无疑问,人们已经从这些治疗中得到了帮助。
There's active debate over what fraction of people who have these symptoms can or should be treated.
关于有这些症状的人中哪一部分可以或应该接受治疗,存在着激烈的争论。
This is typically Adderall or stimulants of some kind.
这通常是阿得拉或某种兴奋剂。
Yeah, for example, stimulants.
是的,例如兴奋剂。
That's right.
这是正确的。
So ADHD, as its name suggests, it has symptoms of-- it can have either a hyperactive state or an inattentive state, and those can be completely separate from each other.
因此,注意力缺陷多动症,顾名思义,它的症状是——它可以有过度活跃的状态,也可以有注意力不集中的状态,而这些症状可以是彼此完全分开的。
You could have a patient who effectively is not hyperactive at all, but can't remain focused on what's going on around them.
您可能会遇到一位患者,他实际上根本没有过度活跃,但无法持续关注周围发生的事情。
So their body can be still, but their mind is darting around?
那么他们的身体可以静止,但是他们的思想却在飞驰?
That's right.
这是正确的。
That's right.
这是正确的。
Or, they can be very hyperactive with their body?
或者,他们的身体可能非常活跃?
Yeah, yeah it happens--
是的,是的,它发生了——
Probably, rarely is somebody hyperactive with their body, but their mind is still.
也许很少有人身体过度活跃,但他们的思想却是静止的。
I notice I have to think complex, abstract thoughts.
我注意到我必须思考复杂、抽象的想法。
I notice I have to be very still.
我注意到我必须保持静止。
So my body has to be almost completely unmoving for me to think very abstractly and deeply.
所以我的身体必须几乎完全不动,这样我才能进行非常抽象和深入的思考。
Other people are different.
其他人则不同。
Some people, when they're running, they get their best thoughts.
有些人,当他们跑步时,他们会想到最好的想法。
I can't even imagine that.
我什至无法想象。
My brain does not work that way at all.
我的大脑根本不是这样运作的。
I have to be totally motionless, which is kind of interesting.
我必须完全一动不动,这很有趣。
How do you go about that?
你怎么办?
I sit much like this.
我的坐姿很像这样。
I try to have time in each day where I am literally sitting almost in this position but without distraction and thinking.
我试着每天都有时间几乎坐在这个位置上,但不会分心和思考。
And so it's almost meditative in some ways, except it's not a true meditation.
所以在某些方面它几乎是冥想,只不过它不是真正的冥想。
But I am thinking, well, not moving.
但我想,好吧,不要动。
You're trying to structure your thoughts in that time?
你当时正在尝试构建你的想法吗?
Yeah, yeah.
是啊是啊。
Interesting.
有趣的。
Yeah, yeah.
是啊是啊。
But everybody, as you say is very different.
但正如你所说,每个人都非常不同。
And so with ADHD you have-- the key thing is we want to make sure that this is present across different domains of life, school and home, to show that it really is a pervasive pattern and not something specific to the teacher or the home situation or something.
因此,对于多动症,关键是我们要确保这种情况存在于生活、学校和家庭的不同领域,以表明它确实是一种普遍的模式,而不是特定于老师或家庭情况或其他什么的。
And then, you can help patients.
然后,你就可以帮助病人。
It's interesting that ADHD is one of those disorders where people are trying to work on quantitative EEG-based diagnoses, and so there's some progress toward making a diagnosis with looking at particular externally detectable brainwave rhythm.
有趣的是,多动症是人们试图进行基于脑电图的定量诊断的疾病之一,因此通过观察特定的外部可检测脑电波节律进行诊断已经取得了一些进展。
So skullcap with some electrodes that don't penetrate the skull?
那么黄盖帽上有一些不穿透头骨的电极吗?
That's right.
这是正确的。
And this can be done in an hour- or two-hour session.
这可以在一小时或两小时的时间内完成。
Yeah, that's right.
是的,没错。
It has to be done in a clinic, right?
必须在诊所进行,对吗?
Yeah, in the clinic, right.
是的,在诊所,对。
You have to have the right recording apparatus and so on.
你必须有合适的录音设备等等。
But that's in principle, as you increase in confidence comes in exactly which measurement.
但这是原则上的,当你对哪种测量的信心增加时。
One could even imagine moving toward home tests.
人们甚至可以想象转向家庭测试。
But we're not there yet.
但我们还没有到那一步。
Amazing.
惊人的。
I think one of the reasons I get asked about it so much is a lot of people wonder if they have ADHD.
我认为我被问到这么多的原因之一是很多人想知道他们是否患有多动症。
Do you think that some of the lifestyle factors that inhabit us all these days could induce a subclinical or a clinical like ADHD?
您认为我们这些天生活中的一些生活方式因素是否会导致像多动症这样的亚临床或临床症状?
Meaning, if I look at people's phone use, including my own, and I don't think of it like addiction, it looks to me and feels to me more like OCD.
意思是,如果我观察人们(包括我自己)的手机使用情况,并且我不认为它是成瘾,那么在我看来,它更像是强迫症。
And I'll come clean here by saying, when I was younger, when I was a kid, I had a grunting tick.
我要坦白说,当我年轻的时候,当我还是个孩子的时候,我有一只咕噜咕噜的蜱虫。
I used to hide it.
我曾经把它隐藏起来。
I actually used to hide in the closet because my dad would make me stop, and I used to-- I couldn't feel any relief of my mind until I would do this.
事实上,我过去常常躲在壁橱里,因为我爸爸会让我停下来,而我曾经——直到我这样做之前,我的心情无法得到任何缓解。
And actually, now, if I get very tired, if I've been pushing long hours, it'll come back.
事实上,现在,如果我很累,如果我长时间工作,它就会回来。
So interesting.
太有趣了。
I was not treated for it.
我没有因此受到治疗。
But I will confess that I've had the experience of-- I always liked sports where I involve a lot of impact.
但我承认我有过这样的经历——我一直喜欢能产生很大影响的运动。
Fortunately, not football, because I went to a high school where the football team was terrible.
幸运的是,不是足球,因为我去了一所高中,那里的橄榄球队很糟糕。
Maybe that would have avoided more impact, but things like skateboarding, boxing, they bring relief.
也许这样可以避免更多的影响,但像滑板、拳击这样的运动可以带来缓解。
I feel clarity after I had hit, which I avoid.
击球后我感觉很清晰,我避免了击球。
But I used to say that's the only time I feel truly clear for a long.
但我曾经说过,这是我很长一段时间以来唯一一次感到真正清醒的时候。
And then eventually it dissipated.
然后最终它消散了。
By about age 16 or 17, it just disappeared.
到了大约 16 或 17 岁的时候,它就消失了。
So I have great empathy for those that feel like there's something contained in them that won't allow them to focus on what they want to focus on.
因此,我对那些感觉自己身上有某种东西不允许他们专注于自己想要专注的事情的人深表同情。
And these days, with the phone and all these email, et cetera, I wonder and I empathize a bit when I hear people saying like, I think I might have ADHD or ADD.
这些天,有了电话和所有这些电子邮件等等,当我听到人们说“我想我可能患有注意力缺陷多动症”或注意力缺失症时,我感到有点同情。
Do you think it's possible that our behaviors and our interaction with the sensory world, which is really what phones and email really are, could induce ADD or reactivate it?
你认为我们的行为以及我们与感官世界的互动(实际上就是电话和电子邮件)可能会诱发或重新激活ADD吗?
This is a great question.
这是一个很好的问题。
I think about it a lot.
我想了很多。
And you mentioned this tic-like behavior in yourself.
你也提到过你自己有这种类似抽动的行为。
It's very common that people who have tics have this building up of something that can only be relieved by executing the tic, which can be a motor movement or a vocalization or even a thought.
抽动症患者体内积聚的东西很常见,只有通过抽动才能缓解,这种抽动可以是运动、发声甚至是想法。
And people do, I think these days do have this.
人们确实这样做了,我想现在确实有这样的情况。
If they haven't checked their phone in a while, they do have a buildup and build up and build up until they can check it and relieve it.
如果他们有一段时间没有检查手机,他们确实会积聚、积聚、积聚,直到他们可以检查并缓解它。
And there's some similarities.
并且有一些相似之处。
There is a little reward that comes with the checking.
检查后会有一点奖励。
But the key question in all of psychiatry what we do is we don't diagnose something unless it's disrupting what we call social or occupational functioning.
但在我们所做的所有精神病学中,关键问题是我们不会诊断某些东西,除非它扰乱了我们所谓的社会或职业功能。
Like, you could have any number of symptoms, but literally every psychiatric diagnosis requires that it has to be disrupting someone's social or occupational functioning.
就像,你可能有任意数量的症状,但实际上每一个精神病学诊断都要求它必须扰乱某人的社交或职业功能。
And these days, checking your phone is pretty adaptive.
如今,检查手机已成为一种非常适应性的行为。
That pretty much helps your social and occupational functioning.
这对你的社交和职业功能很有帮助。
And so we can't make we can't make it a psychiatric diagnosis.
所以我们不能将其作为精神病学诊断。
Interesting.
有趣的。
At least in the world of today.
至少在当今世界是这样。
I'd love your thoughts on psychedelic medicine, putting them into patients and seeing tremendous positive effects but also tremendous examples of induced psychiatric illness.
我很想听听你对迷幻医学的想法,将其应用到患者身上,看到巨大的积极效果,但也看到了诱发精神疾病的巨大例子。
In other words, many people lost their minds as a consequence of overuse of psychedelics.
换句话说,许多人因过度使用致幻剂而失去了理智。
I'll probably lose a few people out there, but I do want to talk about what is the state of these compounds.
我可能会失去一些人,但我确实想谈谈这些化合物的状态。
And I realize it's a huge category of compounds, but LSD and psilocybin, as I understand, trigger activation of particular serotonin receptor mechanisms may or may not lead to more widespread activation of the brain, more that one wouldn't see otherwise.
我意识到这是一大类化合物,但据我所知,LSD 和裸盖菇素会触发特定血清素受体机制的激活,可能会也可能不会导致大脑更广泛的激活,更多的是人们在其他情况下不会看到的。
But when you look at the clinical and experimental literature, what is your top contour sense of how effective these tools are going to be for treating depression?
但是,当您查看临床和实验文献时,您对这些工具治疗抑郁症的效果的总体感觉是什么?
Well, you're right to highlight both the opportunity and the peril that is there.
嗯,你强调了其中的机遇和危险是正确的。
And of course, we want to help patients, and of course, we want to explore anything that might be helpful in what we want to do it in a safe and rigorous way.
当然,我们希望帮助患者,当然,我们希望以安全和严格的方式探索任何可能对我们想做的事情有帮助的事情。
But I do think we should explore these avenues.
但我确实认为我们应该探索这些途径。
These are agents that alter reality and alter the experience of reality, I should say, in relatively precise ways.
我应该说,这些是改变现实和改变现实体验的媒介,以相对精确的方式。
They do have problems.
他们确实有问题。
They can be addictive.
它们可能会让人上瘾。
They can cause lasting change that is not desirable.
它们可能会导致不可取的持久变化。
Now, that said, even as these medications exist now, as you know, there's an impulse to use them in very small doses and to use them as adjunctive treatments for therapy of various kinds, and I'm also supportive of that, if done carefully and rigorously.
话虽如此,正如你所知,即使这些药物现在已经存在,人们仍然有一种冲动以非常小的剂量使用它们,并将它们用作各种治疗的辅助治疗,如果仔细而严格地进行,我也支持这一点。
Of course, there's risk, but there's risk with many other kinds of treatment, and I'm not sure that the risks for these medications vastly outweigh the risks that we normally tolerate in other branches of medicine.
当然,存在风险,但是许多其他类型的治疗也存在风险,而且我不确定这些药物的风险是否远远超过我们通常在其他医学分支中容忍的风险。
Why would they work?
他们为什么要工作?
I mean, let's say that indeed their main effect is to create more connectivity at least in the moment between brain areas.
我的意思是,我们可以说,它们的主要作用确实是至少在大脑区域之间建立更多的连接。
So psychedelics seem to be a trajectory not too far off from the dream state, where space and time are essentially not as rigid.
因此,迷幻剂似乎是一条离梦境不太远的轨迹,其中空间和时间本质上并不那么严格。
And there is this element of synesthesia, of blending of the senses, feeling colors and hearing light and things of that sort.
还有联觉的元素,感官的混合,感觉颜色和听到光以及诸如此类的东西。
You hear these reports anyway.
无论如何,你都会听到这些报道。
Why would having that dream-like experience somehow relieve depression long term.
为什么拥有这种梦幻般的经历会以某种方式长期缓解抑郁症呢?
Do we have any idea why that might be?
我们知道为什么会这样吗?
Yeah, we have some ideas-- no, no, deep understanding.
是的,我们有一些想法——不,不,深刻的理解。
One way I think about the psychedelics is they increase our willingness to-- or they increase the willingness of our brain to accept unlikely ways of constructing the world, unlikely hypotheses, as it were, as to what's going on.
我对致幻剂的一种看法是,它们增加了我们的意愿——或者说,它们增加了我们的大脑接受不太可能的构建世界的方式的意愿,可以说,对于正在发生的事情,不太可能的假设。
The brain and in particular, our cortex, I think, is a hypothesis generation and testing machine.
我认为,大脑,特别是我们的皮层,是一个假设生成和测试机器。
It's coming up with models about everything.
它正在提出关于一切的模型。
It's got a lot of bits of data coming in, and it's making models and updating the models and changing them, theories, hypotheses for what's going on.
它收到了大量的数据,它正在制作模型、更新模型并改变它们、关于正在发生的事情的理论和假设。
And some of those never reach our conscious mind, and this is something I talk about in projections in the book quite a bit, is many of these are filtered out before they get to our conscious mind, and that's good, we think how distracted we'd be if we were constantly having to evaluate all these hypotheses about what kinds of shapes or objects or processes were out there.
其中一些永远不会到达我们的意识头脑,这是我在书中的预测中经常谈到的,其中许多在到达我们的意识头脑之前就被过滤掉了,这很好,我们认为如果我们不断地不得不评估所有这些关于那里有什么样的形状、物体或过程的假设,我们会多么分心。
And so a lot of this is handled before it gets to consciousness, what the psychedelics seem to do is they change the threshold for us to become aware of these incomplete hypotheses or wrong hypotheses or concepts that might be noise but are just wrong.
因此,很多事情在进入意识之前就得到了处理,致幻剂似乎所做的是,它们改变了我们意识到这些不完整的假设或错误的假设或概念的阈值,这些假设或概念可能是噪音,但实际上是错误的。
And so are never allowed to get into our conscious mind.
因此永远不会被允许进入我们的意识。
Now, that that's pretty interesting, and it goes wrong in psychiatric disorders.
现在,这非常有趣,但在精神疾病中却出了问题。
I think in schizophrenia, some of the times, the paranoid delusions that people have are examples of these poor models that escape into the conscious mind and become accepted as reality, and they never should have gotten out there.
我认为在精神分裂症中,有时,人们的偏执妄想就是这些可怜的模型的例子,这些模型逃进了意识思维并被接受为现实,而他们根本不应该走出去。
Now, how could something like this in the right way help with something like depression?
那么,这样的事情如何以正确的方式帮助治疗抑郁症呢?
Patients with depression often are stuck.
抑郁症患者常常陷入困境。
They can't look into the future world of possibilities as effectively.
他们无法有效地审视未来世界的可能性。
Everything seems hopeless, and what does that really mean?
一切看起来都毫无希望,这到底意味着什么?
They discount the value of their own action.
他们低估了自己行动的价值。
They discount the value of the world at giving rise to a future that matters.
他们低估了世界在创造重要未来方面的价值。
Everything seems to run out like a river, just running out into the desert and drying up.
一切似乎都像一条河流一样,流进沙漠,然后干涸。
And what these agents may do that increase the flow through circuitry, if you will, the percolation of activity through circuitry may end up doing for depression is increasing the escape of some tendrils of process of forward progression through the world.
这些药物可能会增加通过回路的流动,如果你愿意的话,通过回路的活动渗透最终可能会导致抑郁症,那就是增加了世界前进过程中一些卷须的逃逸。
That's a concept.
这是一个概念。
It's how I think about it.
我就是这么想的。
There are ways we can make that rigorous.
我们可以通过多种方法使其变得严格。
We can indeed identify in the brain by recording.
我们确实可以通过记录在大脑中进行识别。
We can see cells that represent steps along a path and look into the future, and we can rigorously define these cells, and we can see if these are altered on psychedelics.
我们可以看到代表道路上的步骤并展望未来的细胞,我们可以严格定义这些细胞,我们可以看看这些细胞是否会因迷幻药而改变。
And so that's one of the reasons that we're working with these agents in the laboratory, to say, is this really the case, or are these opening up new paths or representations of paths into the future?
这就是我们在实验室与这些代理合作的原因之一,也就是说,情况真的如此吗?或者这些代理是否开辟了通向未来的新路径或代表路径?
MDMA ecstasy is a unique compound in that it leads to big increases in brain levels of dopamine and serotonin simultaneously, and I realized that the neuromodulators, like dopamine and serotonin, often work in concert, not alone the way they're commonly described in the more general popular discussions.
MDMA 摇头丸是一种独特的化合物,因为它会同时导致大脑中多巴胺和血清素水平大幅增加,我意识到像多巴胺和血清素这样的神经调节剂经常协同作用,而不是像更普遍的流行讨论中通常描述的那样单独发挥作用。
However, it is a unique compound, and it's different than the serotonergic compounds like LSD and psilocybin.
然而,它是一种独特的化合物,与LSD和裸盖菇素等血清素能化合物不同。
And there are now data still emerging that it might be and in some cases can be useful for the treatment of trauma, PTSD, and similar things.
现在仍有数据表明,它可能并且在某些情况下可能对治疗创伤、创伤后应激障碍和类似疾病有用。
Why would that work?
为什么那会起作用?
And do You-- And a larger question, perhaps the more important question is psychedelics, MDMA, LSD, all those compounds there, in my mind there are two components.
你呢——还有一个更大的问题,也许更重要的问题是致幻剂、MDMA、LSD,所有这些化合物,在我看来有两个组成部分。
There's the experience you have while you're on them, and then there's the effect they have after people are generating variations of these compounds that are non-hallucinatory variations.
这是你在使用它们时所获得的体验,然后是当人们产生这些化合物的非幻觉变异后它们所产生的效果。
But how crucial do you think it is to have-- let's stay with MDMA-- the experience of huge levels of dopamine, huge levels of serotonin, atypical levels of dopamine serotonin released, having this highly abnormal experience in order to be normal again.
但你认为拥有大量的多巴胺、大量的血清素、释放的非典型水平的多巴胺、血清素的体验有多重要——让我们继续使用摇头丸——为了再次恢复正常,拥有这种高度异常的体验。
Yeah, I think the brain learns from those experiences.
是的,我认为大脑会从这些经历中学习。
That's the way I see it.
我就是这么看的。
And so, for example, people who've taken MDMA, they will, as you say, they'll be the acute phase of being on the drug and experiencing this extreme connectedness with other people, for example.
因此,例如,服用摇头丸的人,正如您所说,他们将处于吸毒的急性期,并经历与其他人的这种极端联系。
And then, the drug wears off.
然后,药效就消失了。
The brain learned from that experience.
大脑从那次经历中吸取了教训。
And so what people will report is, yeah, I'm not in that state.
所以人们会报告说,是的,我不处于那种状态。
But I saw what was possible.
但我看到了一切的可能性。
I saw, yeah, you can-- it doesn't need to be barriers or at least not as many barriers as I thought.
我看到,是的,你可以——它不需要成为障碍,或者至少不需要像我想象的那么多障碍。
I can connect with more people in a way that is helpful.
我可以以一种有帮助的方式与更多的人联系。
And so I think it's the learning that happens in that state that actually matters.
所以我认为真正重要的是在这种状态下发生的学习。
And as you describe described that.
正如您所描述的那样。
That sounds a lot like what I understand to be the hallmark feature of really good psychoanalysis, that the relationship between patient and therapist hopefully evolves to the point where these kinds of tests can be run within the context of that relationship and then exported to other relations.
这听起来很像我所理解的真正优秀的精神分析的标志特征,即患者和治疗师之间的关系有望发展到可以在这种关系的背景下进行此类测试,然后导出到其他关系的程度。
Is that--
那是不是——
Exactly right, yeah.
完全正确,是的。
And that probably, I'm assuming is still the goal of really good psychiatry, also.
我认为这可能仍然是真正优秀的精神病学的目标。
That's part of--
那是一部分——
Intimacy, really.
亲密,真的。
It should be.
应该是的。
When we have time, I think all good psychiatrists try to achieve that level of connection and learning, try to help patients create a new model that is stable, that is learned and that can help instruct future behavior.
当我们有时间时,我认为所有优秀的精神科医生都会尝试达到这种联系和学习的水平,尝试帮助患者创建一个稳定的、可学习的、可以帮助指导未来行为的新模型。
One of the things that I took from reading your book in addition to learning so much science and the future of psychiatry and brain science was amidst these-- in many cases, very tragic cases and sadness and a lot of the weight that puts on the clinician on you also that there's a central cord of optimism that where we're headed is not just possible but very likely and better.
除了学习如此多的科学知识以及精神病学和脑科学的未来之外,我从读你的书中学到的一件事就是其中之一——在许多情况下,非常悲惨的案例和悲伤,以及给临床医生带来的很大压力,还有一种乐观的中心思想,即我们前进的方向不仅是可能的,而且非常有可能而且更好。
Yeah.
是的。
And are you an optimist?
你是一个乐观主义者吗?
I am, and by the way, this was a really interesting experience in writing projections because I had a dual goal.
顺便说一句,这是一次编写预测的非常有趣的经历,因为我有双重目标。
I wanted it to be for everybody, literally everybody in the world who wants to read it.
我希望它适合每个人,实际上是世界上每个想阅读它的人。
And yet, at the same time, I wanted to stay absolutely rigorously close to the science, what was actually known.
然而,与此同时,我想绝对严格地接近科学,即实际已知的东西。
When I was speaking about science, when I was speaking about the neurobiology of the brain or psychiatry, I wanted to not have any of my scientific colleagues think, oh, he's going too far.
当我谈论科学时,当我谈论大脑的神经生物学或精神病学时,我不想让我的任何科学同事认为,哦,他走得太远了。
He's saying too much.
他说得太多了。
And so I had these two goals, which I kept in my mind the entire time, and a lot of this trying to find exactly the right word we talked about was on this path of staying excruciatingly, rigorous in the science, and yet letting people see the hope that where things have everybody see that we've come a long way; we have a long way to go.
所以我有这两个目标,我一直牢记在心,很多努力都在试图找到我们所讨论的正确的词,在科学上保持极其严格的态度,同时让人们看到希望,在事情让每个人都看到的地方,我们已经取得了长足的进步;我们还有很长的路要走。
But the trajectory and the path is beautiful.
但轨迹和路径是美丽的。
And so that was the goal.
这就是我们的目标。
I think, of course, that sounds almost impossible to jointly satisfy those two goals.
当然,我认为这听起来几乎不可能共同实现这两个目标。
But I kept that in my mind the whole way through.
但我自始至终都将这一点牢记在心。
And yes, I am optimistic, and I hope that came through in the book.
是的,我很乐观,我希望这在书中得到体现。
Well, it certainly did.
嗯,确实如此。
And at least, from this colleague, you did achieve both, and it's a wonderful-- it's a masterful book, really, and one that as a scientist and somebody who is a fellow brain explorer, hits all the marks of rigor and is incredibly interesting, and there's a ton of storytelling.
至少,从这位同事那里,你确实实现了这两点,这是一本精彩的书——真的,这是一本大师级的书,作为一名科学家和一名大脑探索者,这本书达到了所有严谨的标准,而且非常有趣,而且有大量的故事讲述。
Definitely, check out the book.
当然可以,看看书吧。
There are other people in our community that, of course, are going to be reaching out on your behalf, but it's incredible that you juggle this enormous number of things, perhaps even more important.
当然,我们社区中还有其他人会代表您伸出援手,但令人难以置信的是,您同时处理了如此多的事情,甚至可能更重要。
However, is that it's all in service to this larger thing of relieving suffering.
然而,这一切都是为了减轻痛苦这个更大的事情。
So thank you so much for your time today for the book and the work that went into the book.
非常感谢您今天抽出时间来阅读这本书以及为本书所做的工作。
I can't even imagine for the laboratory work and the development channel ops and clarity and all the related technologies and for the clinical work you're doing and for sharing with us.
我什至无法想象实验室工作、开发渠道操作和清晰度以及所有相关技术以及您正在做的临床工作以及与我们分享的情况。
Well, thank you for all you're doing and reaching out.
好吧,感谢您所做的一切和伸出援手。
I'm very impressed by it.
我对此印象非常深刻。
It's important, and it's so valuable, and thank you for taking the time and for all your gracious words about the book.
这很重要,也很有价值,感谢您抽出时间并感谢您对这本书的所有溢美之词。
Thank you.
谢谢。