Death of Blair Peach (Wikipedia featured)
Clement Blair Peach (25 March 1946 – 24 April 1979) was a New Zealand teacher who was killed during an anti-racism demonstration in Southall, London, England.
克莱门特·布莱尔·皮奇（Clement Blair Peach，1946年3月25日至1979年4月24日）是一名新西兰教师，在英国伦敦索撒尔的反种族主义示威中被杀。
A campaigner and activist against the far right, in April 1979 Peach took part in an Anti-Nazi League demonstration in Southall against a National Front election meeting in the town hall and was hit on the head, probably by a member of the Special Patrol Group (SPG), a specialist unit within the Metropolitan Police Service.
作为一名反对极右翼的活动家和活动家，皮奇于 1979 年 4 月参加了索撒尔的反纳粹联盟示威活动，反对在市政厅举行的国民阵线选举会议，头部被击中，击中的可能是伦敦警察厅内的一个专业单位——特别巡逻队 (SPG) 的一名成员。
He died in hospital that night.
当晚他在医院去世。
An investigation by Commander John Cass of the Metropolitan Police's Complaints Investigation Bureau concluded that Peach had been killed by one of six SPG officers, and others had preserved their silence to obstruct his investigation.
大都会警察投诉调查局指挥官约翰·卡斯 (John Cass) 的调查得出结论，皮奇是被六名 SPG 警官之一杀害的，而其他人则保持沉默以阻碍他的调查。
The report was not released to the public, but was available to John Burton, the coroner who conducted the inquest; excerpts from a leaked copy were also published in The Leveller and The Sunday Times in early 1980.
该报告并未向公众发布，但进行调查的验尸官约翰·伯顿（John Burton）可以获取该报告。 1980 年初，《The Leveler》和《星期日泰晤士报》还发表了一份泄露副本的摘录。
In May 1980 the jury in the inquest arrived at a verdict of death by misadventure, although press and some pressure groups—notably the National Council for Civil Liberties—expressed concern that no clear answers had been provided, and at the way Burton conducted the inquest.
1980 年 5 月，陪审团在调查中得出了意外死亡的判决，尽管媒体和一些压力团体——特别是国家公民自由委员会——对没有提供明确答案以及伯顿进行调查的方式表示担忧。
Celia Stubbs, Peach's partner, campaigned for the Cass report to be released and for a full public inquiry.
皮奇的合伙人西莉亚·斯塔布斯 (Celia Stubbs) 发起活动，要求发布卡斯报告并进行全面的公开调查。
An inquiry was rejected, but in 1988 the Metropolitan Police paid £75,000 compensation to Peach's family.
调查被拒绝，但 1988 年伦敦警察厅向 Peach 的家人支付了 75,000 英镑的赔偿金。
In 2009 Ian Tomlinson died after he was struck from behind by a member of the Territorial Support Group, the SPG's successor organisation; the parallels in the deaths proved to be the catalyst in the release of the Cass report to the public.
2009 年，伊恩·汤姆林森 (Ian Tomlinson) 被 SPG 的后继组织——领土支持小组 (Territorial Support Group) 的一名成员从后面击中身亡。事实证明，死亡事件的相似之处是卡斯向公众发布报告的催化剂。
The Metropolitan Police commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, released the report and supporting documentation.
大都会警察局长保罗·斯蒂芬森爵士发布了该报告和支持文件。
He also offered an official apology to Peach's family.
他还向皮奇的家人正式道歉。
The policing of the demonstration in Southall damaged community relations in the area.
对索撒尔示威活动的治安破坏了该地区的社区关系。
Since Peach's death the Metropolitan Police have been involved in a series of incidents and poorly conducted investigations—the 1993 murder of Stephen Lawrence, the death of Jean Charles de Menezes in 2005, the botched 2006 Forest Gate raid and the death of Tomlinson—all of which tarnished the image of the service.
自从皮奇死后，伦敦警察厅卷入了一系列事件和调查不力——1993年斯蒂芬·劳伦斯被谋杀，2005年让·查尔斯·德梅内泽斯死亡，2006年森林门突袭失败和汤姆林森死亡——所有这些都玷污了警察局的形象。
Peach's death has been remembered in the music of the Pop Group, Ralph McTell and Linton Kwesi Johnson; the National Union of Teachers set up the Blair Peach Award for work for equality and diversity issues and a school in Southall is named after him.
桃子的去世被流行乐队拉尔夫·麦克特尔（Ralph McTell）和林顿·奎西·约翰逊（Linton Kwesi Johnson）的音乐所铭记。全国教师联盟设立了布莱尔·皮奇奖，以表彰其在平等和多样性问题上的工作，索撒尔的一所学校也以他的名字命名。
Clement Blair Peach was born in Napier, New Zealand, on 25 March 1946, to Clement and Janet Peach.
克莱门特·布莱尔·皮奇 (Clement Blair Peach) 1946 年 3 月 25 日出生于新西兰内皮尔，父母是克莱门特·皮奇 (Clement Blair Peach) 和珍妮特·皮奇 (Janet Peach)。
He was one of three brothers, the others being Roy and Philip; the former was a solicitor and led the family's legal campaign after Blair's death.
他是三兄弟之一，另外两个兄弟是罗伊和菲利普。前者是一名律师，在布莱尔去世后领导了家族的法律运动。
Blair was schooled at Colenso College, then studied education and psychology at the Victoria University of Wellington, where he co-edited the Argot literary magazine with his flatmate Dennis List and David Rutherford.
布莱尔曾就读于科伦索学院，然后在惠灵顿维多利亚大学学习教育和心理学，在那里他与室友丹尼斯·李斯特和大卫·卢瑟福共同编辑了《Argot》文学杂志。
During his studies Peach visited Britain and liked the country.
皮奇在学习期间访问了英国并喜欢这个国家。
After graduating he was employed in several temporary jobs, but was turned down for compulsory military training for having an "unsuitable character".
毕业后，他曾做过几份临时工作，但因“性格不适合”而被拒绝接受强制军事训练。
He emigrated to Britain in 1969 and was soon employed as a teacher at the Phoenix special needs school in Bow, east London.
1969 年，他移居英国，很快就受聘于伦敦东部弓市的菲尼克斯特殊需要学校担任教师。
In 1970 he entered a long-term relationship with Celia Stubbs; they had first met in New Zealand in 1963 when she was visiting the country.
1970年，他与西莉亚·斯塔布斯（Celia Stubbs）建立了长期关系；他们第一次见面是在 1963 年，当时她正在新西兰访问。
Peach helped raise Stubbs's two daughters from her previous relationship, and the couple regarded each other as husband and wife.
桃子帮助斯塔布斯抚养了前任的两个女儿，夫妻俩视对方为夫妻。
Peach was politically active and joined the Socialist Workers' Party, Socialist Teachers' Association and the local branch of the National Union of Teachers.
佩奇在政治上很活跃，加入了社会主义工人党、社会主义教师协会和全国教师工会的地方分会。
He was also a committed opponent of racism and was active in the Anti-Nazi League.
他也是种族主义的坚定反对者，并积极参与反纳粹联盟。
He had been arrested previously when campaigning on political issues, and in 1974 he was charged with threatening behaviour after challenging a local publican's refusal to serve black customers; he was acquitted.
他此前曾在政治问题竞选活动中被捕，1974 年，他因质疑当地一名酒馆老板拒绝为黑人顾客提供服务而被指控犯有威胁行为；他被无罪释放。
As a result of the population transfers after the 1947 partition of India over ten million people were impoverished.
1947 年印度分治后的人口转移导致超过 1000 万人陷入贫困。
From the late 1950s a significant number of them relocated.
从 20 世纪 50 年代末开始，其中相当一部分人搬迁了。
Many Sikhs and Hindus left the subcontinent to settle in Greater London, particularly Southall, where shortages of workers at factories, and the employment prospects at nearby Heathrow Airport meant jobs were easily obtainable.
许多锡克教徒和印度教徒离开次大陆定居在大伦敦，特别是索撒尔，那里工厂工人短缺，而且附近希思罗机场的就业前景意味着很容易找到工作。
Some of the early arrivals found work at the R.
一些早到的人在 R 找到了工作。
Woolf and Co Rubber factory; by 1965 all the lower level workers were from Poland or the Indian subcontinent.
伍尔夫橡胶厂；到 1965 年，所有低层工人都来自波兰或印度次大陆。
Racial discrimination in the workplace was common; 85 per cent of those Asian workers who had been given entry into the UK on the basis of their education or training were employed only in unskilled or semi-skilled roles.
工作场所的种族歧视很常见；根据教育或培训获准进入英国的亚洲工人中，85% 只从事非熟练或半熟练工作。
Kennetta Hammond Perry, in her history of post-war immigration, identifies the reasons as being "in part because of perceptions about their level of competence and stereotypes about their ability to speak English".
肯尼塔·哈蒙德·佩里 (Kennetta Hammond Perry) 在她的战后移民史中指出，原因是“部分是因为人们对他们的能力水平的看法以及对他们说英语的能力的刻板印象”。
Indian workers also faced discrimination from the white-dominated trade unions, and so formed their own organisation, the Indian Workers' Association (IWA).
印度工人还面临白人主导的工会的歧视，因此成立了自己的组织——印度工人协会（IWA）。
During local elections of the 1960s anti-immigration rhetoric was used by some candidates, successfully in many cases.
在 20 世纪 60 年代的地方选举中，一些候选人使用了反移民言论，并在许多情况下取得了成功。
Smaller right-wing parties used immigration as a platform on which to stand, including in Southall.
较小的右翼政党利用移民作为立足的平台，包括索撒尔。
In the local elections of May 1964, the anti-immigration British National Party (BNP) polled 15 per cent of the vote in Southall; in the general election that October the BNP leader, John Bean, received 9.1 per cent in the Southall constituency.
在 1964 年 5 月的地方选举中，反移民的英国民族党 (BNP) 在索撒尔获得了 15% 的选票；在那年 10 月的大选中，法国国民党 (BNP) 领导人约翰·比恩 (John Bean) 在索撒尔选区获得了 9.1% 的支持率。
Bean won 7.4 per cent of the vote at the 1966 general election.
比恩在 1966 年大选中赢得了 7.4% 的选票。
The BNP's successor, the National Front, recorded 4.4 per cent of the vote at the 1970 general election.
BNP 的继任者国民阵线在 1970 年大选中获得了 4.4% 的选票。
In June 1976 the racist murder of Gurdip Singh Chaggar in Southall—outside the offices of the IWA—led to the former chairman of the National Front, John Kingsley Read, stating "one down, a million to go".
1976 年 6 月，古尔迪普·辛格·查加尔 (Gurdip Singh Chaggar) 在索撒尔 (IWA 办公室外) 遭到种族主义谋杀，导致国民阵线前主席约翰·金斯利·里德 (John Kingsley Read) 表示“一人倒下，一百万还剩一百万”。
Chaggar's murder led to the formation of the Southall Youth Movement (SYM) to challenge the rise in racism and attacks from the National Front.
查加尔的谋杀导致索撒尔青年运动（SYM）的成立，以挑战种族主义的抬头和国民阵线的攻击。
Rioting in the area took place between police and Asian youths and members of Peoples Unite, a similar group to the SYM, but consisting of young Afro-Caribbeans.
该地区的骚乱发生在警察和亚洲青年以及人民团结组织成员之间，该组织与 SYM 类似，但由年轻的非裔加勒比人组成。
The Special Patrol Group (SPG) was formed in 1961 as a specialist squad within the Metropolitan Police.
特别巡逻队 (SPG) 成立于 1961 年，是伦敦警察厅内的一个专业小组。
It provided a mobile, centrally controlled reserve of uniformed officers which supported local areas, particularly when policing serious crime and civil disturbances.
它提供了一支流动的、集中控制的军警后备队，为当地地区提供支持，特别是在处理严重犯罪和内乱时。
The SPG comprised police officers capable of working as disciplined teams preventing public disorder, targeting areas of serious crime, carrying out stop and searches, or providing a response to terrorist threats.
SPG 由警察组成，他们能够作为纪律严明的团队，防止公共骚乱、瞄准严重犯罪地区、进行拦截和搜查，或对恐怖主义威胁做出反应。
In 1978 there were 1,347 SPG members in forces across the UK, 204 of them in the Metropolitan Police Service.
1978 年，英国各地有 1,347 名 SPG 成员，其中 204 名在伦敦警察局。
They were divided into six units, each of which contained three sergeants and 30 constables.
他们被分为六个单位，每个单位包含三名中士和三十名警察。
Each unit was commanded by an inspector.
每个单位都由一名检查员指挥。
The use of the SPG proved controversial to some.
SPG的使用对一些人来说是有争议的。
It was involved in the Red Lion Square disorders, when Kevin Gately, a student demonstrating against a National Front march, was killed from a blow to the head from a blunt instrument; the perpetrator was never identified.
它与红狮广场骚乱有关，当时反对国民阵线游行的学生凯文·盖特利(Kevin Gately)因钝器击中头部而身亡；肇事者的身份始终未被查明。
Accusations were made that the police were inappropriately violent towards those demonstrating.
有人指责警察对示威者使用不当暴力。
The former chief constable, Tim Brain, writes "their critics viewed them with suspicion as a force within a force"; the Metropolitan Police history observes that "their presence sometimes came to assume unwanted symbolic significance".
前警察局长蒂姆·布莱恩 (Tim Brain) 写道，“他们的批评者怀疑他们，认为他们是一股力量中的一股力量”；伦敦警察厅的历史表明，“他们的存在有时会产生不必要的象征意义”。
The former chief constable Geoffrey Dear states that the SPG "might apparently solve one problem but in its wake create another of aggravated relationships between minority groups and the police in general".
前警察局长杰弗里·迪尔 (Geoffrey Dear) 表示，SPG“表面上可能会解决一个问题，但随之而来的是少数群体与警察之间的另一个问题”。
The SPG was disbanded in 1986 and, replaced by District Support Units (DSU).
SPG 于 1986 年解散，并由地区支持单位 (DSU) 取代。
After receiving bad press, the DSU were replaced by the Territorial Support Group in January 1987.
在受到负面报道后，DSU 于 1987 年 1 月被领土支援小组取代。
In the run-up to the 1979 general election, the National Front announced that it would hold a meeting at Southall Town Hall on 23 April 1979, St George's Day.
1979 年大选前夕，国民阵线宣布将于 1979 年 4 月 23 日圣乔治节在索撒尔市政厅举行会议。
Southall was to be one of 300 parliamentary seats for which the organisation put up candidates.
索撒尔将成为该组织推荐候选人的 300 个议会席位之一。
Prior to the Southall meeting, similar events had resulted in clashes with anti-racist protesters, including in Islington, north London, on 22 April, and in Leicester the following day.
在索撒尔会议之前，类似的事件已导致与反种族主义抗议者发生冲突，包括 4 月 22 日在伦敦北部的伊斯灵顿和次日在莱斯特。
At both events, police had been injured trying to keep the two sides separate.
在这两起事件中，都有警察在试图将双方分开时受伤。
A petition of 10,000 residents was raised to cancel the meeting, but to no effect.
有一万名居民请愿取消会议，但没有效果。
Ealing Council had blocked previous meetings by the National Front, but, under the Representation of the People Act 1969, they allowed the party to use the hall.
伊灵议会曾阻止国民阵线之前举行会议，但根据 1969 年《人民代表法》，他们允许该党使用大厅。
The day before the meeting a march by the IWA was planned from central Southall, past the town hall, and ending at Ealing Town Hall.
会议前一天，IWA 计划从索撒尔中部出发，经过市政厅，最后到达伊灵市政厅。
Approximately 1,200 police officers were on duty along the five-mile (eight-kilometre) route; 19 people were arrested.
大约 1,200 名警察在 5 英里（8 公里）长的路线上执勤； 19人被捕。
Two counter-demonstrations for the day of the meeting were planned: a picket on the pavement opposite the hall, and a seated demonstration outside it.
会议当天计划举行两次反示威活动：在大厅对面的人行道上设置纠察队，并在大厅外举行静坐示威。
To deal with the potential violence, 2,876 police officers were drafted in, 94 of whom were on horseback; they arrived at 11:30 am and demonstrators began gathering at 1:00 pm in preparation for the 7:30 pm National Front meeting.
为了应对潜在的暴力事件，共征召了 2,876 名警察，其中 94 名骑在马背上；他们于上午 11:30 抵达，示威者于下午 1:00 开始聚集，为晚上 7:30 的国民阵线会议做准备。
The number of demonstrators at the town hall rose, and included some whom the police considered militant elements.
市政厅的示威者人数有所增加，其中包括一些被警方视为激进分子的人。
There were some clashes between police and protesters and a small number of arrests ensued.
警察和抗议者之间发生了一些冲突，并导致少数人被捕。
The police decided to establish a sterile cordon around the town hall, although they still allowed a small, contained demonstration in the High Street.
警方决定在市政厅周围建立一条无菌警戒线，尽管他们仍然允许在高街举行小型、封闭的示威活动。
Cordons were set up on Lady Margaret Road, the Broadway, High Street and South Road.
玛格丽特夫人路、百老汇、高街和南路都设立了警戒线。
Between 2:30 and 3:15 pm, at the High Street cordon, missiles were thrown at the police, who used riot shields to contain the crowd.
下午 2:30 至 3:15 之间，在高街警戒线，有人向警察投掷导弹，警察使用防暴盾牌来控制人群。
According to the official police report, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm the level of violence rose as the crowd at the High Street cordon again began to throw missiles and at about 6:20 pm between 500 and 2,000 protesters tried to breach the police lines.
根据警方的官方报告，下午 5:30 至 6:30 期间，随着高街警戒线的人群再次开始投掷导弹，暴力程度有所上升，下午 6:20 左右，有 500 至 2,000 名抗议者试图突破警察防线。
In response, mounted officers were brought in to disperse the crowd.
作为回应，骑警被派来驱散人群。
The author Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, who was present at the demonstration, thought the mood changed when the police tactics changed from containment to dispersement, which triggered the missile-throwing reaction from the crowd.
参与示威活动的作者亚斯明·阿利拜-布朗认为，当警察的策略从遏制转向驱散时，情绪发生了变化，引发了人群投掷导弹的反应。
A house on Park View Road, the headquarters of Peoples Unite, was used as a first aid post.
公园景路的一栋房子是人民团结组织的总部，被用作急救站。
The official police report states that the residents were "a group of mainly Rastafarians" who were squatting at the premises, and that these occupants threw missiles from the house at police in the street.
警方的官方报告称，这些居民是“一群主要是拉斯塔法里教徒”，他们蹲在房子里，这些居住者从房子里向街上的警察投掷导弹。
SPG officers entered the house and an altercation broke out in which two officers were stabbed.
SPG 警察进入房屋，发生争执，两名警察被刺伤。
Those in the house—including those manning the first aid post and those receiving treatment—were beaten with truncheons, and an estimated £10,000 of damage was done to the contents of the house, including the equipment for the band Misty in Roots; the group's manager, Clarence Baker, went into a coma for five months after his skull was fractured by a police truncheon.
房子里的人——包括急救站的工作人员和接受治疗的人——遭到警棍殴打，房子里的物品估计损失了 10,000 英镑，其中包括 Misty in Roots 乐队的设备；该组织的经理克拉伦斯·贝克(Clarence Baker)的头骨被警察警棍打碎，随后陷入昏迷五个月。
All those inside were removed from the property, regardless of what they were doing, and there were subsequent complaints by the inhabitants of racist and sexist abuse by the police.
所有里面的人都被带出了房子，无论他们在做什么，居民随后抱怨警察实施种族主义和性别歧视。
Seventy people were arrested either at or near the address.
七十人在该地址或附近被捕。
At the trial of one of those arrested, one of the SPG officers involved reported "there was no overall direction of the police forces at this time" and the situation was "a free for all".
在对其中一名被捕者的审判中，一名参与的 SPG 警官报告说，“目前警察部队没有总体方向”，情况是“所有人都可以自由”。
National Front members began arriving from 7:00 pm.
国民阵线成员从晚上 7:00 开始抵达。
At its scheduled time their meeting took place.
他们的会议在预定的时间举行了。
During the assembly, one of the organisation's speakers called for "the bulldozing of Southall and its replacement by a 'peaceful English hamlet'".
在集会期间，该组织的一位发言人呼吁“推平索撒尔并用‘和平的英国小村庄’取而代之”。
Four members of the public were allowed into the hall to fulfil the requirements of the Representation of the People Act, but a journalist from The Daily Mirror was stopped from entering because the newspaper was considered to be "nigger loving".
四名公众被允许进入大厅，以满足《人民代表法》的要求，但《每日镜报》的一名记者被阻止进入，因为该报纸被认为是“热爱黑人”。
When the meeting ended at about 10:00 pm, some of the attendees gave Nazi salutes on the steps of the town hall before being escorted to safety by the police.
晚上 10:00 左右会议结束时，一些与会者在市政厅的台阶上行了纳粹礼，然后被警察护送到安全地带。
Once the meeting was underway, the police decided to clear the area of demonstrators and allowed them to pass along the Broadway towards the crossroads with Northcote Avenue and Beachcroft Avenue.
会议开始后，警方决定清除该地区的示威者，并允许他们沿着百老汇前往诺斯科特大道和比奇克罗夫特大道的十字路口。
At about 7:30 pm Peach, with four friends, decided to return to their cars and moved towards the junction.
晚上 7 点 30 分左右，Peach 和四个朋友决定回到车上，朝路口走去。
The group had been on the Broadway since they arrived in the area at 4:45 pm.
自从下午 4 点 45 分到达该地区以来，他们一直在百老汇。
At around the same time a flare or petrol bomb was thrown either at or over a police coach on the Broadway.
大约在同一时间，有人向百老汇的一辆警车或警车上方投掷了一枚照明弹或汽油弹。
The driver—with a policeman standing next to him—drove the coach through the crowd; no-one was injured, but eyewitnesses said that the mood of the crowd changed at that point.
司机带着一名警察站在他旁边，开着大巴穿过人群。没有人受伤，但目击者说，人群的情绪在那一刻发生了变化。
Two SPG vans drove westwards along the Broadway and collected two crates of bricks and bottles that the crowd left behind as they retreated.
两辆SPG货车沿着百老汇向西行驶，收集了人群撤退时留下的两箱砖头和瓶子。
Items were thrown at the two vehicles and a police inspector on a building roof radioed to the central control unit that there was a riot in progress.
有人向两辆车投掷物品，建筑物屋顶上的一名警察督察通过无线电向中央控制单元报告正在发生骚乱。
Peach and his friends turned off the Broadway down Beachcroft Avenue, thinking they were heading out of the area, but not realising the road only connected to Orchard Avenue, which led back to The Broadway and the heavy police cordon there.
皮奇和他的朋友们沿着比奇克罗夫特大道拐出了百老汇，以为他们要离开该地区，但没有意识到这条路只与果园大道相连，而这条路又通向百老汇和那里的重重警戒线。
There was a group of 100 to 150 protesters on the corner of the Broadway and Beachcroft Avenue and the SPG vans of Unit 3 drove to the junction of the Broadway with Northcote Avenue and Beachcroft Avenue to face them.
百老汇和Beachcroft大道的拐角处有100至150名抗议者，Unit 3的SPG面包车开到百老汇与Northcote大道和Beachcroft大道的交界处与他们对峙。
As the officers deployed out of the vehicles they were hit by missiles from the crowd.
当警察从车里出来时，他们被人群发射的导弹击中。
One officer was hit in the face by a brick which fractured his jaw in three places.
一名警官的脸部被砖头击中，下巴三处骨折。
The inspector leading the unit radioed "Immediate assistance required".
领导该部队的检查员通过无线电广播“需要立即援助”。
The official investigation into Peach's death states that the events leading up to this point, while difficult, were relatively straightforward, but that "further description of what happened" is hampered by "conflicting accounts [that] have been given by private persons and also by police".
对皮奇之死的官方调查表明，导致这一点的事件虽然困难，但相对简单，但“对发生的事情的进一步描述”受到“私人和警方提供的相互矛盾的说法”的阻碍。
The radio call from Unit 3 was picked up by SPG Unit 1, two of whose vans drove into Beachcroft Avenue from the Broadway entrance and stopped at the corner with Orchard Avenue.
SPG 1 单元接到了来自 3 单元的无线电呼叫，该单元的两辆货车从百老汇入口驶入 Beachcroft 大道，并停在 Orchard 大道的拐角处。
They deployed while under bombardment from bricks and stones.
他们在砖块和石头的轰炸下部署。
The first person to exit the van was Inspector Alan Murray, who had charge of the first van of Unit 1 (called Unit 1-1), and was followed by constables Bint, White, Freestone, Richardson and Scottow.
第一个从车上下来的人是警官艾伦·默里（Alan Murray），他负责 1 单元（称为 Unit 1-1）的第一辆面包车，随后是警员宾特、怀特、弗里斯通、理查森和斯科特。
Murray and his men were using riot shields, had their truncheons drawn and worked to disperse the crowd.
穆雷和他的手下使用防暴盾牌，拔出警棍，努力驱散人群。
During this action Peach received a blow on the head.
在这次行动中，桃子的头部受到了打击。
Fourteen witnesses stated that they saw it happen and said that it was a police officer who struck the blow.
十四名目击者称，他们亲眼目睹了这一切，并称是一名警察实施了殴打。
One resident told the inquest that she:
一名居民在调查中表示，她：
saw blue vans coming down Beachcroft Avenue.
看到蓝色货车沿着比奇克罗夫特大道驶来。
They were coming very fast—as they came round Beachcroft Avenue, they stopped.
他们来得很快——当他们绕过比奇克罗夫特大道时，他们停了下来。
I saw policemen with shields come out—people started running and the police tried to disperse them.
我看到带着盾牌的警察出来了——人们开始逃跑，警察试图驱散他们。
I saw police hitting.
我看到警察打人。
I saw a white man standing there ...
我看到一个白人站在那里......
The police were hitting everybody.
警察殴打所有人。
People started running, some in the alley, some in my house ...
人们开始奔跑，有的在巷子里，有的在我家……
I saw Peach, I then saw the policeman with the shield attack Peach.
我看到了桃子，然后我看到了拿着盾牌的警察攻击桃子。
Peach was taken into a nearby house—71 Orchard Avenue—after one of the residents saw him being hit.
一名居民看到桃子被撞后，他被带到附近的一所房子（果园大道 71 号）。
He was given a glass of water, but could not hold it.
有人给了他一杯水，但他拿不住。
His eyes were rolled up to the top of his head and he had difficulty speaking.
他的眼睛翻到了头顶，说话有些困难。
The residents soon called an ambulance, which was logged at 8:12 pm; it arrived within ten minutes, and Peach was taken to Ealing Hospital.
居民们很快叫了救护车，救护车的登记时间是晚上8点12分；十分钟内就到达了，皮奇被送往伊灵医院。
He was promptly operated on because of a large extradural haematoma but his condition worsened through the procedure.
由于硬膜外血肿较大，他立即接受了手术，但手术过程中他的病情恶化了。
He died at 12:10 am on 24 April.
他于4月24日中午12点10分去世。
There were 3,000 protesters in Southall on 23 April.
4 月 23 日，索撒尔有 3,000 名抗议者。
The police arrested 345 people.
警方逮捕了345人。
Ninety-seven police were injured, as were 39 of the prisoners; 25 members of the public were also injured, of whom Peach was one.
97 名警察受伤，39 名囚犯受伤； 25 名公众也受伤，Peach 就是其中之一。
A member of the National Front was found near Southall train station, badly beaten.
一名国民阵线成员在索撒尔火车站附近被发现，身受重伤。
He spent two days in intensive care before being released.
他在重症监护室呆了两天才出院。
Within a day of Peach's death, Commander John Cass of the Metropolitan Police's Complaints Investigation Bureau began an investigation of the events and statements were taken from members of the SPG that day.
皮奇死亡后的一天内，伦敦警察厅投诉调查局指挥官约翰·卡斯开始对事件进行调查，并于当天从 SPG 成员处获取了证词。
Sir David McNee, then the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, also undertook his own eight-day review of the demonstrations, although he did not include Peach's death as part of his analysis.
时任大都会警察局长戴维·麦克尼爵士也对示威活动进行了为期八天的审查，尽管他没有将皮奇的死亡纳入他的分析中。
The inquest opened on 26 April 1979; John Burton, the coroner for West London, oversaw the proceedings.
调查于 1979 年 4 月 26 日开始；西伦敦验尸官约翰·伯顿监督了整个过程。
On the opening day he allowed Peach's family to have a second post-mortem examination undertaken by an independent pathologist; the inquest was then adjourned for a month.
开业当天，他允许皮奇的家人接受由独立病理学家进行的第二次尸检；审讯随后推迟一个月。
It reconvened on 25 May 1979 and was again adjourned after Cass appeared as a witness and said that his investigation would take between two and three months more.
1979 年 5 月 25 日重新召开会议，卡斯作为证人出庭并表示他的调查还需要两到三个月的时间后再次休会。
By that time, he and his team had interviewed 400 people.
到那时，他和他的团队已经采访了 400 人。
Burton said that the inquiry would reconvene after Sir Tony Hetherington, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), had been given the report.
伯顿表示，在检察长托尼·赫瑟林顿爵士收到报告后，调查将重新进行。
Despite statements by the police and the incumbent government that the trouble at Southall was caused by outsiders to the area, only 2 of the 342 charged were non-residents of Southall.
尽管警方和现任政府声明索撒尔的骚乱是由该地区的外来者造成的，但 342 名被指控的人中只有 2 人不是索撒尔居民。
Instead of holding the trials locally, they were held 25 miles (40 km) away in Barnet.
他们没有在当地举行审判，而是在 25 英里（40 公里）外的巴尼特举行审判。
Lalith de Kauwe, writing for Bulletin—the publication of the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers—writes that while initially 90 per cent of the defendants were found guilty, this dropped to 70 per cent once the press began to publicise the matter.
Lalith de Kauwe 为 Haldane 社会主义律师协会的刊物《公报》撰稿，写道，虽然最初 90% 的被告被判有罪，但一旦媒体开始宣传此事，这一比例就下降到 70%。
On 12 June 1979 Peach's body was laid out at the Dominion Cinema in Southall; 8,000 people filed past it.
1979 年 6 月 12 日，皮奇的尸体被安放在索撒尔的 Dominion 电影院； 8,000人鱼贯而过。
The following day he was buried at East London Cemetery, where between 5,000 and 10,000 people were in attendance.
第二天，他被安葬在东伦敦公墓，有 5,000 到 10,000 人参加了葬礼。
Three days after the funeral, McNee defended the actions of the SPG and told a black reporter "I understand the concern of your people.
葬礼三天后，麦克尼为 SPG 的行为进行了辩护，并对一名黑人记者说：“我理解你们人民的担忧。
But if you keep off the streets of London and behave yourselves you won't have the SPG to worry about."
但如果你远离伦敦的街道并保持良好的行为，你就不会担心 SPG 的问题。”
One member of SPG Unit 1-1 was questioned by Cass's team in early June 1979 after the forensic report stated that Peach was probably not killed by a police truncheon, but by a lead-filled cosh or pipe.
1979 年 6 月上旬，卡斯团队审问了 SPG 1-1 部队的一名成员，因为法医报告称 Peach 很可能不是被警察警棍杀死的，而是被铅芯或铅管杀死的。
A search of the unit's lockers found 26 weapons—including police truncheons—many of which were unauthorised, including coshes and knives, as well as sets of keys and a stolen driving licence.
对该单位的储物柜进行搜查，发现 26 件武器（包括警棍），其中许多是未经授权的，包括警棍和刀具，以及几套钥匙和一张被盗的驾驶执照。
Cass's team raided the home of PC Grenville Bint, where weapons and Nazi memorabilia were found.
卡斯的团队突袭了 PC Grenville Bint 的家，在那里发现了武器和纳粹纪念品。
Bint stated he collected the memorabilia as a hobby.
宾特表示，他收集这些纪念品是一种爱好。
During his investigation Cass held several identification parades, including for Officer F, Officer G and Officer I.
在调查期间，卡斯举行了多次认人游行，包括 F 警官、G 警官和 I 警官。
These were identified by the barrister and historian David Renton from the inquest as PCs Raymond White, James Scottow and Anthony Richardson, respectively.
大律师兼历史学家大卫·伦顿 (David Renton) 在调查中确认，这些人分别是 PC 雷蒙德·怀特 (Raymond White)、詹姆斯·斯科特 (James Scottow) 和安东尼·理查森 (Anthony Richardson)。
No witness managed to identify the man they saw hitting Peach.
没有目击者能够认出他们看到的殴打桃子的人。
It later transpired that one officer present at the riots shaved off the moustache which he had that day, while Inspector Murray grew a beard and refused to take part in the identity parades.
后来发现，骚乱中的一名警官剃掉了当天的胡子，而默里督察留起了胡子，拒绝参加身份游行。
Many of the uniforms that the police wore that day had been dry-cleaned before they were inspected.
当天警察穿的许多制服在接受检查前都经过干洗。
Cass ran up against misleading stories from the members of Unit 1-1 and in his report he stated "The attitude and untruthfulness of some of the officers involved is a contributory factor." He continued "The action of these officers clearly obstructed the police officers carrying out their duty of investigating this serious matter." Cass decided that he had identified the individual whom he considered most likely to have hit Peach, but that there was "no evidence of a conclusive nature":
卡斯遇到了 1-1 部队成员的误导性故事，他在报告中表示“一些涉案警官的态度和不诚实是一个促成因素。”他继续说：“这些警察的行为显然阻碍了警察履行调查这一严重事件的职责。”卡斯认为他已经确定了他认为最有可能袭击桃子的人，但“没有确凿的证据”：
The officers in that carrier after disembarking, who could have assaulted Clement Blair PEACH were Officer E, Officer H, Officer G, Officer I, Officer J and Officer F, and I give them in that order of possibility.
下船后，该航母上可能袭击克莱门特·布莱尔·佩奇的警官是 E 警官、H 警官、G 警官、I 警官、J 警官和 F 警官，我按照可能性的顺序列出了他们。
Renton identified these officers as Murray, Bint, Scottow, Richardson, Freestone and White, respectively.
伦顿确认这些警官分别是穆雷、宾特、斯科特、理查森、弗里斯通和怀特。
Cass's report was accepted by the police as being accurate, and in his 1983 autobiography McNee wrote "when all the evidence was assembled it showed that Blair Peach had died from a blow to his skull.
卡斯的报告被警方认为是准确的，麦克尼在他 1983 年的自传中写道：“当所有证据收集完毕后，结果表明布莱尔·皮奇因颅骨受到打击而死亡。
The evidence pointed to the fact that the blow had been struck by a police officer."
证据表明这一击是由一名警察击中的。”
Cass finished the investigation in February 1980; 30 investigators had worked for 31,000 man-hours during his enquiries.
卡斯于1980年2月完成调查； 30名调查员在他的调查过程中工作了31,000个工时。
He finished his initial report on 12 July 1979, which was sent to the DPP, who, while praising the work he had done, stated that "there was insufficient evidence to justify a prosecution".
他于 1979 年 7 月 12 日完成了初步报告，该报告被发送给民进党，民进党在赞扬他所做的工作的同时表示，“没有足够的证据证明起诉是合理的”。
The inquest reopened a week later.
一周后，审讯重新开始。
Both Burton and the lawyers representing the Metropolitan Police were given copies of Cass's report, but refused to provide copies to the lawyers representing the Peach family or those representing the Anti-Nazi League.
伯顿和代表大都会警察局的律师都收到了卡斯报告的副本，但拒绝向代表皮奇家族或代表反纳粹联盟的律师提供副本。
Burton used Cass's report to determine which witnesses to call and which to ignore.
伯顿利用卡斯的报告来决定传唤哪些证人以及忽略哪些证人。
Michael Dummett, Wykeham Professor of Logic at Oxford University, examining the case for the National Council for Civil Liberties, observes that as only the coroner and police lawyers had copies of the report, "it was impossible for anyone ...
牛津大学威克汉姆逻辑学教授迈克尔·达米特（Michael Dummett）在为国家公民自由委员会审查此案时指出，由于只有验尸官和警方律师拥有该报告的副本，“任何人都不可能......
[else] to obtain a complete picture of the evidence".
[其他]获得证据的完整情况”。
The question of whether the family were allowed to view the reports was taken to a Divisional Court, who ruled that as the report was the property of the police, they had the right to withhold it.
是否允许家人查看报告的问题被提交给地方法院，法院裁定，由于报告是警察的财产，他们有权扣留。
Legal counsel for the Peach family requested that the inquest be held in front of a jury, which Burton rejected; the inquest was again adjourned.
皮奇家族的法律顾问要求在陪审团面前进行调查，但伯顿拒绝了；审讯再次延期。
The High Court rejected a challenge to overturn Burton's decision, which then went to the Court of Appeal where Lord Denning stated that the inquest should reconvene in front of a jury.
高等法院驳回了推翻伯顿决定的挑战，该决定随后提交上诉法院，丹宁勋爵表示应在陪审团面前重新进行调查。
In early 1980 sections of the Cass report were published in The Leveller (January 1980) and The Sunday Times (March 1980).
1980 年初，卡斯报告的部分内容发表在《The Leveler》（1980 年 1 月）和《星期日泰晤士报》（1980 年 3 月）上。
Details included in both publications were the names of Murray, White, Freestone, Richardson and Scottow.
这两份出版物中包含的详细信息包括穆雷、怀特、弗里斯通、理查森和斯科特的名字。
The latter publication indicated that the decision by the DPP not to prosecute the policemen "left the investigating officers in the invidious position of appearing party to a cover-up, should their report ever become public".
后一份出版物指出，民进党决定不起诉警察，“如果调查人员的报告被公开，他们就会陷入掩盖事实的令人反感的境地”。
In April 1980—the one-year anniversary of Peach's death—members of the group "Friends of Blair Peach Committee" picketed outside police stations holding posters that named the six members of SPG Unit 1-1 and the words "Wanted for the murder of Blair Peach".
1980 年 4 月，即皮奇去世一周年纪念日，“布莱尔·皮奇之友委员会”组织的成员在警察局外举行纠察队，他们举着海报，上面写着 SPG 1-1 部队的六名成员，并写着“因谋杀布莱尔·皮奇而被通缉”。
The inquest reconvened on 28 April 1980 and was expected to last several weeks.
调查于 1980 年 4 月 28 日重新召开，预计将持续数周。
Both pathologists—David Bowen for the coroner and Keith Mant acting for the family—came to the same conclusions: that death was from a single blow, not a police truncheon, but a "rubber 'cosh' or hosepipe filled with lead shot, or some like weapon".
两位病理学家——验尸官的大卫·鲍文（David Bowen）和家属的基思·曼特（Keith Mant）——得出了相同的结论：死亡是由一击造成的，不是警察的警棍，而是“橡胶‘cosh’或装满铅弹的软管，或类似的武器”。
Both stated that Peach had a thin skull, but not, as Mant observed, "pathologically thin".
两人都表示，桃子的头骨很薄，但并不像曼特所观察到的那样，“薄得病态”。
He described the action that caused the injury as "a very severe, single blow".
他将导致受伤的行为描述为“一次非常严重的单一打击”。
The inquest closed on 27 May 1980 during which time 83 witnesses were called.
调查于 1980 年 5 月 27 日结束，期间传唤了 83 名证人。
A verdict of death by misadventure was given.
作出了意外死亡的判决。
The criminologists Phil Scraton and Paul Gordon consider that, given the conclusions of the Cass report, unlawful killing would have been a more appropriate verdict.
犯罪学家菲尔·斯克拉顿（Phil Scraton）和保罗·戈登（Paul Gordon）认为，鉴于卡斯报告的结论，非法杀人是更合适的判决。
In its leader the following day, The Times said that "the Peach inquest failed to provide a clear and believable explanation of the events in question"; it also stated that Peach's death should continue to be investigated.
第二天，《泰晤士报》在其头条中表示，“桃子调查未能对相关事件提供清晰可信的解释”；它还表示，桃子的死因应继续调查。
The National Council for Civil Liberties expressed concern at the way Burton conducted the inquest.
国家公民自由委员会对伯顿进行调查的方式表示担忧。
The organisation felt uneasy with a theory that he put to the jury: that Peach was killed by "some political fanatic" in order to make him a martyr against the police.
该组织对他向陪审团提出的一个理论感到不安：皮奇是被“一些政治狂热分子”杀害的，目的是让他成为反对警察的烈士。
During the course of the inquest, Burton wrote to ministers to say that the question of whether Peach was killed by a police officer was a "political 'fabrication'".
在调查过程中，伯顿写信给部长们表示，皮奇是否被警察杀害的问题是“政治‘捏造’”。
He also wrote to the home secretary, lord chancellor and attorney general, claiming that there was a conspiracy to spread false information about Peach's death; he accused several media outlets, including the BBC, of producing what he described as "biased propaganda".
他还写信给内政大臣、财政大臣和司法部长，声称有人阴谋散布有关皮奇之死的虚假信息；他指责包括英国广播公司在内的多家媒体制作了他所说的“有偏见的宣传”。
In 2010 The Daily Telegraph considered that Burton had shown a "lack of sympathy ...
2010年，《每日电讯报》认为伯顿表现出“缺乏同情心......
towards Mr Peach's death".
走向皮奇先生的死亡”。
After the inquest Burton wrote a seven-page article entitled "The Blair Peach Inquest – the Unpublished Story", which he wanted to publish in the Coroners' Society annual report.
调查结束后，伯顿写了一篇长达七页的文章，题为“布莱尔桃子调查——未发表的故事”，他想在验尸官协会的年度报告中发表。
In the article, he said that some civilian witnesses lied and were "totally politically committed to the Socialist Workers Party", and he thought that some of the Sikh witnesses "did not have experience of the English system" to give reliable evidence.
他在文章中表示，一些平民证人撒谎，“完全在政治上忠于社会主义工人党”，他认为一些锡克教证人“没有英国制度的经验”，无法提供可靠的证据。
He was persuaded not to publish the account by civil servants, who considered that the report would "discredit the impartiality of coroners in general and Dr Burton in particular".
公务员说服他不要公布这份报告，他们认为这份报告将“损害验尸官的公正性，特别是伯顿博士的声誉”。
There were several calls for a public inquiry to examine the circumstances surrounding Peach's death and the role of the police; 79 MPs supported such a hearing, but the government refused to hold such a review.
有人多次呼吁进行公开调查，以调查皮奇死亡的情况以及警方的作用； 79 名议员支持举行这样的听证会，但政府拒绝举行这样的审查。
The Peach family also challenged the Metropolitan Police in court for the Cass report and supporting papers to be released.
皮奇家族还在法庭上向伦敦警察厅提出质疑，要求公布卡斯报告和支持文件。
In February 1986 the Court of Appeal ruled that the police should release the statements and supporting papers, but not the report itself.
1986 年 2 月，上诉法院裁定警方应公布陈述和支持文件，但不得公布报告本身。
The family also sought to claim damages from the Metropolitan Police and in June 1988, after eight years of trying, they were awarded £75,000.
这家人还向伦敦警察厅寻求损害赔偿，经过八年的努力，1988 年 6 月，他们获得了 75,000 英镑的赔偿。
The political historian Mick Ryan observes that the Peach case is an example where "compensation is ...
政治历史学家米克·瑞安 (Mick Ryan) 指出，“桃子案”是“补偿……”的一个例子。
paid in tacit admission that a wrong had been committed".
付出代价就等于默认了错误的发生”。
In April 1999 Paul Boateng, the Minister of State for Home Affairs, was the final minister who turned down the request for a public inquiry, saying the event had happened too long ago to be beneficial.
1999 年 4 月，内政部国务部长保罗·博阿滕 (Paul Boateng) 是最后一位拒绝公开调查请求的部长，他称该事件发生得太久了，没有什么好处。
Following correspondence with the Peach family at the time of the twentieth anniversary of Peach's death, Commander Ian Quinn of the Metropolitan Police's complaints bureau undertook a review of investigation in 1999.
1999 年，伦敦警察局投诉局指挥官伊恩·奎恩 (Ian Quinn) 在皮奇去世 20 周年之际与皮奇家人进行了通信，随后对调查进行了审查。
The family were not told of the investigation or its outcome.
家人没有被告知调查或其结果。
On 1 April 2009, at the 2009 G20 London summit protests, a member of the Territorial Support Group, the SPG's successor organisation, struck Ian Tomlinson, a newspaper vendor, who collapsed and died.
2009年4月1日，在2009年G20伦敦峰会抗议活动中，SPG的后继组织领土支持小组的一名成员袭击了报摊小贩伊恩·汤姆林森(Ian Tomlinson)，后者倒地身亡。
The parallels in the deaths of the two men proved to be the catalyst in the release of the Cass report to the public.
事实证明，两人死亡的相似之处是卡斯向公众发布报告的催化剂。
Stephenson also officially apologised to Peach's family.
史蒂芬森也正式向皮奇的家人道歉。
That June the Metropolitan Police commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson announced that Cass's report and supporting documentation would be released.
那年六月，大都会警察局长保罗·斯蒂芬森爵士宣布将公布卡斯的报告和支持文件。
After Stephenson's announcement that the Metropolitan police would publish the Cass report, Murray stated that he believed he was the officer referred to in the report as "Officer E", but said that "Under no circumstances was I involved in the death of Blair Peach.
在斯蒂芬森宣布大都会警察局将公布卡斯报告后，默里表示，他相信自己就是报告中提到的“E警官”，但他表示“在任何情况下，我都没有参与布莱尔·皮奇的死亡。
I was not involved in his death.
我没有参与他的死亡。
I'm as certain as I can be." Murray considered Cass's report to be "pure fabrication to justify his failure to identify the perpetrator of this act".
我尽我所能确定。”默里认为卡斯的报告“纯粹是捏造的，目的是证明他未能查明这一行为的肇事者”。
Angered at the handling of the initial investigation, Murray left the police and joined his brother's jewellery business in Scotland before becoming a lecturer in corporate responsibility at the University of Sheffield.
由于对初步调查的处理方式感到愤怒，穆雷离开了警察局，加入了他兄弟在苏格兰的珠宝生意，之后成为谢菲尔德大学企业责任讲师。
Two days after the Nazi memorabilia and unauthorised weapons were found in his possession, Bint was transferred out of the SPG.
在宾特身上发现纳粹纪念品和未经授权的武器两天后，宾特被调出了 SPG。
Richardson and Freestone were transferred out soon afterwards; Scottow and White voluntarily transferred.
理查森和弗里斯通很快就被调走了；斯科特和怀特自愿转学。
All the officers left the police force shortly after the investigation ended.
调查结束后不久，所有警官都离开了警察队伍。
In 2021 evidence was provided to the Undercover Policing Inquiry that the Metropolitan Police monitored Stubbs with undercover officers for about twenty years.
2021 年，向卧底警务调查提供的证据表明，大都会警察局与便衣警察一起监视斯塔布斯约二十年。
This included taking photographs at Peach's funeral and creating an attendee list report, and monitoring the 20th anniversary event planning in 1998.
其中包括在 Peach 的葬礼上拍照并创建与会者名单报告，以及监督 1998 年的 20 周年纪念活动规划。
Following the actions of the police at Southall, the Asian community in the area felt that relations between them and the police had broken down; many saw the police as aggressors.
索撒尔警方采取行动后，该地区的亚裔社区感到他们与警方的关系已经破裂；许多人将警察视为侵略者。
One member of the community said "Our feeling now towards the police is one of shock.
一名社区成员说：“我们现在对警察的感觉是震惊。
In India the police are very brutal, but none of us believed until Monday night that the police here could behave equally brutally." The journalists Mark Hughes and Cahal Milmo consider that the action of the SPG "became a symbol of police corruption".
印度的警察非常残暴，但直到周一晚上我们才相信这里的警察也会表现得同样残暴。”记者马克·休斯和卡哈尔·米尔莫认为SPG的行为“成为警察腐败的象征”。
Writing after the release of the Cass report, the leader in The Times opined that following Peach's death, "the Metropolitan Police entered a dark place from which they have been struggling to emerge ever since".
卡斯报告发布后，《泰晤士报》的领导人撰文表示，皮奇死后，“伦敦警察厅进入了一个黑暗的地方，从那时起他们就一直在努力摆脱困境”。
In 2010 Andy Hayman, the former assistant commissioner for Specialist Operations at the Metropolitan Police, wrote that Peach's death brought the service and the SPG into disrepute.
2010 年，前伦敦警察厅专业行动助理局长安迪·海曼 (Andy Hayman) 写道，皮奇的去世使警察局和 SPG 名誉扫地。
It led to an undermining of confidence in the police and "creat[ed] a distrust of officers that in some quarters, has proved difficult to shake off".
这导致人们对警察的信心受损，并“造成了对警察的不信任，在某些方面，事实证明这种不信任很难摆脱”。
The criminologists Chris Greer and Eugene McLaughlin considered Peach's death alongside the Metropolitan Police's actions in relation to the 1993 murder of Stephen Lawrence, the death of Jean Charles de Menezes in 2005, the botched 2006 Forest Gate raid and the death of Ian Tomlinson; they described the "succession of institutional scandals, cover-ups and botched investigations" that had tarnished the image of the service.
犯罪学家克里斯·格里尔（Chris Greer）和尤金·麦克劳克林（Eugene McLaughlin）将皮奇之死与伦敦警察厅对1993年斯蒂芬·劳伦斯谋杀案、2005年让·查尔斯·德·梅内泽斯之死、2006年拙劣的森林门突袭和伊恩·汤姆林森之死的行动一起考虑；他们描述了“一系列机构丑闻、掩盖事实和拙劣的调查”，这些丑闻损害了该部门的形象。
Writing in the light of Tomlinson's death, Philip Johnston, a journalist with The Daily Telegraph, observed that Peach was one in a number of incidents where there had been unwarranted police aggression.
《每日电讯报》记者菲利普·约翰斯顿就汤姆林森之死撰文指出，皮奇事件是警察无端攻击的众多事件之一。
Johnston wrote that while at the time of Peach's death many people would have sided with the police, that is no longer the case.
约翰斯顿写道，虽然在皮奇去世时，许多人会站在警察一边，但现在情况已不再如此。
"Many of those from the countryside who attended the Westminster rally against the ban on fox-hunting bear the scars of a brutal confrontation with the police, which changed their view of them for ever."
“参加威斯敏斯特反对猎狐禁令集会的许多来自农村的人都因与警察的残酷对抗而留下伤痕，这永远改变了他们对他们的看法。”
Public reaction to Peach's death, and other underlying racial tensions including excessive police use of the sus law, ultimately led to the 1981 Brixton riot and a public inquiry by Lord Scarman.
公众对皮奇之死的反应，以及其他潜在的种族紧张局势，包括警察过度使用种族歧视法，最终导致了 1981 年布里克斯顿骚乱和斯卡曼勋爵的公开调查。
A primary school in Southall was later named after Peach.
索撒尔的一所小学后来以皮奇的名字命名。
The Blair Peach Award was set up by the National Union of Teachers in 2010 to commemorate the former union member and as recognition of exemplary work by current members in schools and Union branches for equality and diversity issues.
布莱尔桃子奖由全国教师工会于 2010 年设立，旨在纪念前工会成员，并表彰学校和工会分支机构现任成员在平等和多样性问题上的模范工作。
In 1989 the poet and activist Chris Searle edited One for Blair, an anthology of poems for the young.
1989 年，诗人兼活动家克里斯·塞尔 (Chris Searle) 为年轻人编辑了《One for Blair》诗集。
The injury to Clarence Baker was commemorated in the Ruts's song "Jah War".
车辙乐队的歌曲“Jah War”中纪念了克拉伦斯·贝克的受伤。
The Two-Tone album The 2 Tone Story is dedicated to Peach's memory.
Two-Tone 专辑《The 2 Tone Story》是为了纪念 Peach。
Several songs have been written in Peach's memory, or referring to his death, including the Pop Group's 1980 song "Justice"; the 1982 song "Water of Dreams" by Ralph McTell; and "Reggae Fi Peach" by Linton Kwesi Johnson, which contains the lyrics:
有几首歌曲是为了纪念 Peach 或提及他的死亡而写的，其中包括 Pop Group 1980 年的歌曲《Justice》； Ralph McTell 1982 年的歌曲“Water of Dreams”；以及 Linton Kwesi Johnson 的《Reggae Fi Peach》，歌词如下：
Liddle Towers
里德尔塔
Baumann, Gerd (1996).
鲍曼，格尔德（1996）。
Contesting Culture: Discourses of Identity in Multi-ethnic London.
竞争文化：多民族伦敦的身份话语。
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
剑桥：剑桥大学出版社。
ISBN 978-0-521-55554-8.
ISBN 978-0-521-55554-8。
Brah, Avtar (2005).
布拉，阿凡达 (2005)。
Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities.
侨民制图：身份争论。
London: Routledge.
伦敦：劳特利奇。
ISBN 978-1-134-80868-7.
ISBN 978-1-134-80868-7。
Brain, Timothy (2010).
蒂莫西·大脑（2010）。
A History of Policing in England and Wales from 1974: A Turbulent Journey.
1974 年以来英格兰和威尔士警务史：动荡的旅程。
Oxford University Press.
牛津大学出版社。
ISBN 978-0-19-921866-0.
ISBN 978-0-19-921866-0。
Butler, David; King, Anthony (1965).
巴特勒，大卫；安东尼·金 (1965)。
The British General Election of 1964.
1964年英国大选。
London: Macmillan.
伦敦：麦克米伦。
ISBN 978-1-349-81741-2.
ISBN 978-1-349-81741-2。
Butler, David; King, Anthony (1966).
巴特勒，大卫；安东尼·金 (1966)。
The British General Election of 1966.
1966年英国大选。
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
伦敦：帕尔格雷夫·麦克米伦。
ISBN 978-1-349-00548-2.
ISBN 978-1-349-00548-2。
Butler, David; Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael (1971).
巴特勒，大卫；迈克尔·平托-杜钦斯基 (1971)。
The British General Election of 1970.
1970年英国大选。
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
伦敦：帕尔格雷夫·麦克米伦。
ISBN 978-1-349-01095-0.
ISBN 978-1-349-01095-0。
Conklin Frederking, Lauretta (2007).
康克林·弗雷德金，劳雷塔 (2007)。
Economic and Political Integration in Immigrant Neighborhoods: Trajectories of Virtuous and Vicious Cycles.
移民社区的经济和政治一体化：良性循环和恶性循环的轨迹。
Cranbury, NJ: Susquehanna University Press.
新泽西州克兰伯里：萨斯奎哈纳大学出版社。
ISBN 978-1-57591-111-3.
ISBN 978-1-57591-111-3。
Cram, Ian (2016).
伊恩·克拉姆 (2016)。
Contested Words: Legal Restrictions on Freedom of Speech in Liberal Democracies.
有争议的言论：自由民主国家对言论自由的法律限制。
London: Routledge.
伦敦：劳特利奇。
ISBN 978-1-317-16030-4.
ISBN 978-1-317-16030-4。
Dummett, Michael (1980).
迈克尔·达米特 (1980)。
The Death of Blair Peach: the Supplementary Report of the Unofficial Committee of Enquiry.
布莱尔·皮奇之死：非官方调查委员会的补充报告。
London: National Council for Civil Liberties.
伦敦：国家公民自由委员会。
ISBN 978-0-9011-0891-3.
ISBN 978-0-9011-0891-3。
Gilroy, Paul (2004).
保罗·吉尔罗伊（2004）。
"Police and Thieves".
《警察与小偷》。
In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.).
在当代文化研究中心（编辑）。
Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70's Britain.
帝国反击：70 年代英国的种族和种族主义。
London: Routledge.
伦敦：劳特利奇。
pp.
页数
141–180.
141–180。
ISBN 978-1-134-89702-5.
ISBN 978-1-134-89702-5。
Hammond Perry, Kennetta (2015).
哈蒙德·佩里，肯尼塔 (2015)。
London is the Place for Me: Black Britons, Citizenship, and the Politics of Race.
伦敦是我的地方：英国黑人、公民身份和种族政治。
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
牛津：牛津大学出版社。
ISBN 978-0-19-024020-2.
ISBN 978-0-19-024020-2。
Hann, Dave (2012).
汉恩，戴夫（2012）。
Physical Resistance: A Hundred Years of Anti-Fascism.
身体抵抗：反法西斯一百年。
Winchester: John Hunt Publishing.
温彻斯特：约翰亨特出版。
ISBN 978-1-7809-9177-1.
ISBN 978-1-7809-9177-1。
Joyce, Peter (2010).
乔伊斯，彼得（2010）。
Policing: Development and Contemporary Practice.
警务：发展与当代实践。
London: SAGE Publications.
伦敦：SAGE 出版物。
ISBN 978-1-4462-4826-3.
ISBN 978-1-4462-4826-3。
Joyce, Peter; Wain, Neil (2014).
乔伊斯，彼得；尼尔·韦恩 (2014)。
Palgrave Dictionary of Public Order Policing, Protest and Political Violence.
帕尔格雷夫公共秩序警务、抗议和政治暴力词典。
London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
伦敦：英国帕尔格雷夫·麦克米伦。
ISBN 978-1-137-27008-5.
ISBN 978-1-137-27008-5。
Kettle, Martin; Hodges, Lucy (1982).
水壶，马丁；露西·霍奇斯 (1982)。
Uprising!: the Police, the People, and the Riots in Britain's Cities.
起义！：英国城市的警察、人民和骚乱。
London: Pan Books.
伦敦：潘书局。
ISBN 978-0-330-26845-5.
ISBN 978-0-330-26845-5。
Lynskey, Dorian (2012).
林斯基，多里安（2012）。
33 Revolutions Per Minute.
每分钟 33 转。
London: Faber.
伦敦：法布尔。
ISBN 978-0-5712-4135-4.
ISBN 978-0-5712-4135-4。
McNee, David (1983).
大卫·麦克尼 (1983)。
McNee's Law.
麦克尼定律。
London: Collins.
伦敦：柯林斯。
ISBN 978-0-0021-7007-9.
ISBN 978-0-0021-7007-9。
Payne-James, Jason; Busuttil, Anthony; Smock, William (2003).
佩恩-詹姆斯，杰森；安东尼·布苏蒂尔；威廉·斯莫克（2003）。
Forensic Medicine: Clinical and Pathological Aspects.
法医学：临床和病理学方面。
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
剑桥：剑桥大学出版社。
ISBN 978-1-84110-026-5.
ISBN 978-1-84110-026-5。
Ransom, David (1980).
大卫·兰塞姆 (1980)。
The Blair Peach Case: Licence to Kill.
布莱尔·皮奇案：杀人许可证。
London: Friends of Blair Peach Committee.
伦敦：布莱尔·皮奇之友委员会。
ISBN 978-0-906224-04-5.
ISBN 978-0-906224-04-5。
Rollo, Joanna (1980).
乔安娜·罗洛 (1980)。
"The Special Patrol Group".
“特别巡逻队”。
In Hain, Peter (ed.).
在海恩，彼得（编辑）。
Policing the Police.
警察维持治安。
London: John Calder.
伦敦：约翰·考尔德。
pp.
页数
153–208.
153–208。
ISBN 978-0-7145-3795-5.
ISBN 978-0-7145-3795-5。
Ryan, Mick (1996).
瑞安·米克 (1996)。
Lobbying From Below: Inquest in Defence of Civil Liberties.
自下而上的游说：捍卫公民自由的调查。
London: Taylor & Francis Group.
伦敦：泰勒与弗朗西斯集团。
ISBN 978-1-85728-256-6.
ISBN 978-1-85728-256-6。
Samantrai, Ranu (2002).
拉努·萨曼特莱 (2002)。
AlterNatives: Black Feminism in the Postimperial Nation.
另类土著：后帝国国家的黑人女权主义。
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
加利福尼亚州斯坦福：斯坦福大学出版社。
ISBN 978-0-8047-4321-1.
ISBN 978-0-8047-4321-1。
Scraton, Phil; Gordon, Paul (1984).
菲尔·斯克拉顿；保罗·戈登 (1984)。
Causes for concern.
令人担忧的原因。
London: Penguin.
伦敦：企鹅。
ISBN 978-0-1402-2464-1.
ISBN 978-0-1402-2464-1。
Waddington, Peter (1994).
彼得·沃丁顿 (1994)。
Liberty and Order: Public Order Policing in a Capital City.
自由与秩序：首都的公共秩序治安。
London: UCL Press.
伦敦：伦敦大学学院出版社。
ISBN 978-1-85728-226-9.
ISBN 978-1-85728-226-9。
Ward, Tony (1986).
托尼·沃德 (1986)。
Death and disorder: Three Case Studies of Public Order and Policing in London.
死亡与混乱：伦敦公共秩序和治安的三个案例研究。
London: INQUEST.
伦敦：审讯。
ISBN 978-0-946858-02-6.
ISBN 978-0-946858-02-6。
Waters, Rob (2018).
罗布·沃特斯 (2018)。
Thinking Black: Britain, 1964–1985.
黑人思维：英国，1964-1985。
Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
加利福尼亚州奥克兰：加利福尼亚大学出版社。
ISBN 978-0-520-96720-5.
ISBN 978-0-520-96720-5。
Cass, John (12 July 1979).
约翰·卡斯（1979 年 7 月 12 日）。
Report of Commander Cass dated 12 July 1979 (Report).
卡斯指挥官 1979 年 7 月 12 日的报告（报告）。
Metropolitan Police.
伦敦警察厅。
Retrieved 25 March 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 3 月 25 日。
Cass, John (14 September 1979).
约翰·卡斯（1979 年 9 月 14 日）。
Report of Commander Cass dated 14 September 1979 (Report).
卡斯指挥官 1979 年 9 月 14 日的报告（报告）。
Metropolitan Police.
伦敦警察厅。
Retrieved 25 March 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 3 月 25 日。
Cass, John (23 August 1999).
约翰·卡斯（1999 年 8 月 23 日）。
Report of Commander Cass dated 23 August 1999 (Report).
卡斯指挥官 1999 年 8 月 23 日的报告（报告）。
Metropolitan Police.
伦敦警察厅。
Retrieved 25 March 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 3 月 25 日。
Overview of the Southall demonstration, Investigating officers' reports into the death of Blair Peach and the decision of the then Director of Public Prosecutions (Report).
索撒尔示威概述、调查官员关于布莱尔·皮奇死亡的报告以及时任检察长的决定（报告）。
Metropolitan Police.
伦敦警察厅。
24 April 1979.
1979 年 4 月 24 日。
Retrieved 25 March 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 3 月 25 日。
Davis, Bob (24 September 2009).
鲍勃·戴维斯（2009 年 9 月 24 日）。
"Going in by the front door: Searle, Earl Marshal School and Sheffield".
“从前门进去：塞尔、伯爵马歇尔学校和谢菲尔德”。
Race & Class.
种族和阶级。
51 (2): 79–91.
51（2）：79-91。
doi:10.1177/0306396809345578.
号码：10.1177/0306396809345578。
S2CID 144977992.
S2CID 144977992。
de Kauwe, Lalith (Spring 1980).
de Kauwe，Lalith（1980 年春季）。
"Southall—23rd April 1979".
“索撒尔——1979 年 4 月 23 日”。
Bulletin (12): 13–16.
公报（12）：13-16。
JSTOR 44749659.
JSTOR 44749659。
Fox, Lynne (1995).
林恩·福克斯 (1995)。
"'Southall People' – Making an Exhibition of Themselves".
“‘索撒尔人’——举办自己的展览”。
Immigrants & Minorities.
移民和少数民族。
14 (3): 304–307.
14（3）：304-307。
doi:10.1080/02619288.1995.9974869.
doi：10.1080/02619288.1995.9974869。
Greer, Chris; McLaughlin, Eugene (November 2010).
格里尔，克里斯；尤金·麦克劳克林（2010 年 11 月）。
"We Predict A Riot?: Public Order Policing, New Media Environments and the Rise of the Citizen Journalist".
“我们预测骚乱？：公共秩序警务、新媒体环境和公民记者的崛起”。
The British Journal of Criminology.
英国犯罪学杂志。
50 (6): 1041–1059.
50（6）：1041-1059。
doi:10.1093/bjc/azq039.
doi：10.1093/bjc/azq039。
JSTOR 43610824.
JSTOR 43610824。
Greer, Chris; McLaughlin, Eugene (March 2012).
格里尔，克里斯；尤金·麦克劳克林（2012 年 3 月）。
"'This Is Not Justice': Ian Tomlinson, Institutional Failure and the Press Politics of Outrage" (PDF).
“‘这不是正义’：伊恩·汤姆林森，制度失败和愤怒的新闻政治”(PDF)。
The British Journal of Criminology.
英国犯罪学杂志。
52 (2): 274–293.
52（2）：274-293。
doi:10.1093/bjc/azr086.
doi：10.1093/bjc/azr086。
JSTOR 44173489.
JSTOR 44173489。
Karapin, Roger (July 1999).
罗杰·卡拉平（1999 年 7 月）。
"The Politics of Immigration Control in Britain and Germany: Subnational Politicians and Social Movements".
“英国和德国的移民控制政治：地方政治家和社会运动”。
Comparative Politics.
比较政治学。
31 (4): 423–444.
31（4）：423-444。
doi:10.2307/422238.
doi：10.2307/422238。
JSTOR 422238.
JSTOR 422238。
PMID 20120546.
PMID 20120546。
Manson, Hugo (19 April 1980).
雨果·曼森（1980 年 4 月 19 日）。
"The Killing of Blair Peach".
《布莱尔·皮奇之死》。
New Zealand Listener: 14–15.
新西兰听众：14-15。
May, Alex (2012).
五月，亚历克斯（2012）。
"Peach, (Clement) Blair (1946–1979)".
“桃子，（克莱门特）布莱尔（1946-1979）”。
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.).
牛津国家传记词典（在线版）。
Oxford University Press.
牛津大学出版社。
doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/47730.
doi：10.1093/ref：odnb/47730。
Retrieved 25 March 2018.
检索日期：2018 年 3 月 25 日。
(Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
（需要订阅、维基百科图书馆访问权限或英国公共图书馆会员资格。）
Renton, David (22 May 2014).
大卫·伦顿（2014 年 5 月 22 日）。
"The Killing of Blair Peach".
《布莱尔·皮奇之死》。
London Review of Books.
伦敦书评。
36 (10): 23–26.
36（10）：23-26。
ISSN 0260-9592.
ISSN 0260-9592。
Richman, Paula (March 1999).
保拉·里奇曼（1999 年 3 月）。
"A Diaspora Ramayana in Southall, Greater London".
“大伦敦索撒尔的流散罗摩衍那”。
Journal of the American Academy of Religion.
美国宗教学院杂志。
67 (1): 33–57.
67（1）：33-57。
doi:10.1093/jaarel/67.1.33.
doi：10.1093/jaarel/67.1.33。
JSTOR 1466032.
JSTOR 1466032。
Wright, Niel (March 2008).
尼尔·赖特（2008 年 3 月）。
"Dennis List: An Appreciation" (PDF).
“丹尼斯·李斯特：欣赏”（PDF）。
Ka Mate Ka Ora: A New Zealand Journal of Poetry and Poetics (5): 184–187.
卡马特卡奥拉：新西兰诗歌与诗学杂志（5）：184-187。
"25 police hurt in NF march".
“25名警察在NF游行中受伤”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
22 April 1979.
1979 年 4 月 22 日。
p.
p。
1.
1.
"1979: Teacher dies in Southall race riots".
“1979：老师在索撒尔种族骚乱中死亡”。
BBC.
英国广播公司。
2008.
2008年。
"1980: Peach death was 'misadventure'".
“1980：桃子的死是‘不幸’”。
BBC.
英国广播公司。
2008.
2008年。
Alderson, Andrew (25 April 2010).
安德鲁·奥尔德森（2010 年 4 月 25 日）。
"Uncomfortable reading' for the Met as Blair Peach documents go public".
当布莱尔·皮奇的文件公开时，大都会“读起来不舒服”。
The Sunday Telegraph.
《星期日电讯报》。
p.
p。
10.
10.
Anand, Jasbir (29 January 2019).
阿南德·贾斯比尔（2019 年 1 月 29 日）。
"Southall riots: A personal reflection".
“索撒尔骚乱：个人反思”。
Ealing News Extra.
伊灵新闻特辑。
Archived from the original on 10 April 2019.
原始存档于2019年4月10日。
Retrieved 11 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 11 日。
Barling, Kurt (28 April 2009).
库尔特·巴林（2009 年 4 月 28 日）。
"Southall Rising".
《索撒尔崛起》。
BBC.
英国广播公司。
Retrieved 10 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 10 日。
"Blair Peach".
“布莱尔·桃子”。
Leader.
领导者。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
28 April 2010.
2010 年 4 月 28 日。
p.
p。
2.
2.
"Blair Peach death secrecy review".
“布莱尔·皮奇死亡保密审查”。
BBC.
英国广播公司。
25 June 2009.
2009 年 6 月 25 日。
"Blair Peach inquest may set a record".
“布莱尔·皮奇调查可能会创下纪录”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
28 April 1980.
1980 年 4 月 28 日。
p.
p。
2.
2.
"The Blair Peach killing: Top yard men urged charges".
“布莱尔·皮奇谋杀案：顶级船厂人员敦促指控”。
The Sunday Times.
星期日泰晤士报。
16 March 1980.
1980 年 3 月 16 日。
p.
p。
1.
1.
"Blair Peach: Now the SPG men will testify".
“布莱尔·皮奇：现在 SPG 成员将作证”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
11 May 1980.
1980 年 5 月 11 日。
p.
p。
4.
4.
Chaudhary, Vivek (4 April 2018).
维韦克·乔杜里（2018 年 4 月 4 日）。
"How London's Southall became 'Little Punjab'".
“伦敦索撒尔如何成为‘小旁遮普’”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Chippindale, Peter; Ballantyne, Aileen (24 April 1979).
奇平代尔，彼得；艾琳·巴兰坦（1979 年 4 月 24 日）。
"Teacher dies in Front clashes".
“老师在前线冲突中丧生”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
1.
1.
Deeley, Peter (29 April 1979).
彼得·迪利（1979 年 4 月 29 日）。
"Southhall claims refuted".
“索斯霍尔的主张被驳斥”。
The Observer.
观察家报.
pp.
页数
1–2.
1-2。
Evans, Martin (28 April 2010).
马丁·埃文斯（2010 年 4 月 28 日）。
"Blair Peach Inspector denies responsibility".
“布莱尔·桃子督察否认负有责任”。
The Daily Telegraph.
每日电讯报。
Evans, Rob (6 May 2021).
罗布·埃文斯（2021 年 5 月 6 日）。
"Met spied on partner of Blair Peach for more than two decades, inquiry hears".
“调查得知，我对布莱尔·皮奇的伴侣进行了二十多年的监视”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Ford, Richard (28 April 2010a).
理查德·福特（2010 年 4 月 28 日a）。
"Riot police did kill Blair Peach".
“防暴警察确实杀死了布莱尔·皮奇”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
4.
4.
Ford, Richard (1 May 2010b).
理查德·福特（2010 年 5 月 1 日b）。
"Dignity of woman who waited for the truth about Blair Peach".
“等待布莱尔·皮奇真相的女人的尊严”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
37.
37.
Fresco, Adam (10 April 2009).
亚当·弗雷斯科（2009 年 4 月 10 日）。
"Officer suspended over G20 death as second post-mortem is held".
“在进行第二次尸检时，官员暂停了 G20 死亡事件”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
7.
7.
Hayman, Andy (28 April 2010).
安迪·海曼（2010 年 4 月 28 日）。
"Riot police did kill Blair Peach".
“防暴警察确实杀死了布莱尔·皮奇”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
4.
4.
Hughes, Mark; Milmo, Cahal (28 April 2010).
休斯，马克；卡哈尔·米尔莫（2010 年 4 月 28 日）。
"How a riot in Southall became a symbol of police corruption".
“索撒尔的骚乱如何成为警察腐败的象征”。
The Independent.
独立报。
p.
p。
16.
16.
Johnston, Philip (9 April 2009).
菲利普·约翰斯顿（2009 年 4 月 9 日）。
"We want a police force, not brute force; Ian Tomlinson's death was a tragedy.
“我们想要一支警察部队，而不是暴力；伊恩·汤姆林森的死是一场悲剧。
What is worse is that, once again, the police misled us about what happened".
更糟糕的是，警方再次误导了我们关于所发生的事情”。
The Daily Telegraph.
每日电讯报。
p.
p。
27.
27.
"Law Report: Statements to be disclosed in police complaint".
“法律报告：警方投诉中须披露的陈述”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
5 February 1986.
1986 年 2 月 5 日。
p.
p。
25.
25.
Leigh, David (16 November 1979).
大卫·利（1979 年 11 月 16 日）。
"Blair Peach family loses jury inquest plea".
“布莱尔·皮奇家族在陪审团调查中败诉”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
28.
28.
Lewis, Paul (13 June 2009a).
保罗·刘易斯（2009 年 6 月 13 日a）。
"Partner of man killed by Met officers calls for investigation to be made public".
“被伦敦警察局警察杀害的男子的伴侣呼吁公开调查”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Lewis, Paul (3 October 2009b).
保罗·刘易斯（2009 年 10 月 3 日b）。
"Secret Met inquiry into death of Blair Peach revealed: Family of teacher killed at protest unaware of review: Scotland Yard commander reopened file 10 years ago".
“大都会警察局对布莱尔·皮奇之死的秘密调查显示：老师的家人在抗议中被杀，但不知道审查：苏格兰场指挥官十年前重新打开了档案”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
12.
12.
Lewis, Paul (22 January 2010a).
保罗·刘易斯（2010 年 1 月 22 日a）。
"Secret document which implicated Blair Peach coroner withheld by Home Office".
“内政部扣留的涉及布莱尔·皮奇验尸官的秘密文件”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Lewis, Paul (27 April 2010b).
保罗·刘易斯（2010 年 4 月 27 日b）。
"Blair Peach killed by police at 1979 protest, Met report finds".
“大都会报告发现，布莱尔·皮奇在 1979 年抗议活动中被警察杀害”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Lewis, Paul (27 April 2010c).
保罗·刘易斯（2010 年 4 月 27 日c）。
"Blair Peach: After 31 years Met police say 'sorry' for their role in his killing".
“布莱尔·皮奇：31年后，大都会警察为他们在杀害他过程中所扮演的角色表示‘抱歉’”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Lewis, Paul (28 April 2010d).
保罗·刘易斯（2010 年 4 月 28 日d）。
"Blair Peach: Met inquiry: Ian Tomlinson death was catalyst in report's release".
“布莱尔·皮奇：会见调查：伊恩·汤姆林森的死亡是报告发布的催化剂”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
5.
5.
"The life of Blair Peach".
《布莱尔·皮奇的一生》。
The Guardian.
卫报。
16 July 1979.
1979 年 7 月 16 日。
p.
p。
11.
11.
Marshall, Peter (13 October 2009).
彼得·马歇尔（2009 年 10 月 13 日）。
"Blair Peach 'prime suspect' speaks out".
“布莱尔·皮奇‘主要嫌疑人’说出了真相”。
BBC.
英国广播公司。
"National Front fields almost 300 candidates".
“国民阵线派出近300名候选人”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
19 April 1979.
1979 年 4 月 19 日。
p.
p。
6.
6.
Oates, Jonathan (29 January 2019).
乔纳森·奥茨（2019 年 1 月 29 日）。
"Southall riots: 23 April 1979".
“索撒尔骚乱：1979 年 4 月 23 日”。
Ealing News Extra.
伊灵新闻特辑。
Archived from the original on 17 November 2020.
原始存档于2020年11月17日。
Retrieved 10 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 10 日。
Pallister, David (25 May 1979a).
大卫·帕利斯特（1979 年 5 月 25 日a）。
"Peach death file for DPP".
《民进党桃子死亡档案》。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
2.
2.
Pallister, David (14 June 1979b).
大卫·帕利斯特（1979 年 6 月 14 日b）。
"Testimony to a fallen comrade and friend".
“对一位倒下的同志和朋友的证言”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
14.
14.
Pallister, David (4 October 1979c).
大卫·帕利斯特（1979 年 10 月 4 日c）。
"Anger at DPP's decision on Peach death".
“对民进党对桃子之死的决定感到愤怒”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
28.
28.
Pallister, David (12 October 1979d).
大卫·帕利斯特（1979 年 10 月 12 日）。
"Inquest told 'Blair was beaten in police truncheon charge'".
“调查显示‘布莱尔在警察警棍指控中遭到殴打’”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
2.
2.
Parry, Gareth (27 April 1979).
加雷斯·帕里（1979 年 4 月 27 日）。
"Police equipment not adequate, says union".
工会表示，“警察装备不足”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
4.
4.
Parry, Gareth; Chippindale, Peter (25 April 1979).
帕里，加雷斯；彼得·齐平代尔（1979 年 4 月 25 日）。
"Dead man known to Front by sight".
“眼前所见的死者”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
2.
2.
"PC hid his cosh 'in panic' before search".
“在搜查之前，PC‘惊慌失措’地隐藏了他的同事”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
15 May 1980.
1980 年 5 月 15 日。
p.
p。
4.
4.
Peach, Giles (29 April 2010).
贾尔斯·佩奇（2010 年 4 月 29 日）。
"We don't want an apology for my uncle.
“我们不想为我叔叔道歉。
Just the truth".
只是事实”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
24.
24.
"Peach application".
“桃申请”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
10 June 1988.
1988 年 6 月 10 日。
p.
p。
2.
2.
"Policeman injured in Front clashes".
“警察在前线冲突中受伤”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
21 April 1979.
1979 年 4 月 21 日。
p.
p。
24.
24.
Puri, Kavita (5 August 2015).
卡维塔·普里（2015 年 8 月 5 日）。
"The pool of blood that changed my life".
“改变我一生的血泊”。
BBC.
英国广播公司。
Singer, Angela (15 December 1979).
歌手安吉拉（1979 年 12 月 15 日）。
"Denning rules Peach inquest must have jury".
“丹宁规定桃子调查必须有陪审团”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
p.
p。
24.
24.
Stubbs, Celia (14 June 2009).
西莉亚·斯塔布斯（2009 年 6 月 14 日）。
"Lessons from the death of Blair Peach".
“布莱尔·皮奇之死的教训”。
The Guardian.
卫报。
Symon, Penny (15 December 1979).
佩妮·西蒙（1979 年 12 月 15 日）。
"Blair Peach inquest to be held before a jury after ruling by Court of Appeal".
“上诉法院做出裁决后，布莱尔·皮奇将在陪审团面前进行调查”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
1.
1.
Timmins, Nicholas (22 April 1980a).
尼古拉斯·蒂明斯（1980 年 4 月 22 日a）。
"Peach group name police on 'wanted' poster".
“桃色集团在‘通缉’海报上点名警察”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
p.
p。
1.
1.
Timmins, Nicholas (28 May 1980b).
尼古拉斯·蒂明斯（1980 年 5 月 28 日b）。
"Tighter police control urged in Peach misadventure verdict".
“桃子事故判决中敦促警方加强控制”。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
pp.
页数
1–2.
1-2。
"A Verdict of Misadventure with Riders".
“与骑手的不幸遭遇的判决”。
Leader.
领导者。
The Times.
泰晤士报。
28 May 1980.
1980 年 5 月 28 日。
p.
p。
15.
15.
The 2 Tone Story (Liner notes).
2 音故事（Liner 注释）。
Chrysalis Records.
蛹记录。
1989.
1989年。
353 657.
353657。
"Blair Peach Award".
“布莱尔桃子奖”。
National Union of Teachers.
全国教师联盟。
Archived from the original on 11 April 2019.
原始存档于2019年4月11日。
Retrieved 11 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 11 日。
"Blair Peach Gravestone".
“布莱尔桃子墓碑”。
Getty Images.
盖蒂图片社。
9 January 2017.
2017 年 1 月 9 日。
Archived from the original on 8 May 2019.
原始存档于2019年5月8日。
Retrieved 8 May 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 5 月 8 日。
"Blair Peach Primary School".
“布莱尔桃子小学”。
Ealing Council.
伊灵议会。
Retrieved 11 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 11 日。
Clark, Gregory (2023).
格雷戈里·克拉克（2023）。
"The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)".
“1209 年至今英国的年度零售价格指数和平均收入（新系列）”。
MeasuringWorth.
衡量价值。
Archived from the original on 1 April 2023.
原始存档于2023年4月1日。
Retrieved 22 February 2023.
检索日期：2023 年 2 月 22 日。
Fisher, Devon (15 March 2016).
费舍尔，德文郡（2016 年 3 月 15 日）。
"The Pop Group: For How Much Longer Do We Tolerate Mass Murder?".
“流行乐队：我们还能容忍大规模谋杀多久？”。
Pop Matters.
流行音乐很重要。
Retrieved 12 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 12 日。
"History of the Metropolitan Police: Special Patrol Group".
《伦敦警察厅的历史：特别巡逻队》。
Metropolitan Police Service.
大都会警察局。
Archived from the original on 15 August 2012.
原始存档于2012年8月15日。
Retrieved 4 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 4 日。
McTell, Ralph.
麦克特尔、拉尔夫.
"Water of Dreams".
《梦之水》。
Retrieved 11 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 11 日。
"Reggae Fi Peach".
“雷鬼 Fi 桃子”。
Shazam.
沙赞。
Retrieved 12 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 12 日。
Searle, Chris (23 April 1979).
克里斯·塞尔（1979 年 4 月 23 日）。
"Remembering Blair Peach: 30 Years On".
“纪念布莱尔·桃子：30 周年”。
Institute of Race Relations.
种族关系研究所。
Archived from the original on 16 November 2018.
原始存档于2018年11月16日。
Retrieved 29 March 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 3 月 29 日。
"Southall, April 1979: How to fight the fascists and win (then and now)".
“索撒尔，1979 年 4 月：如何对抗法西斯并取得胜利（当时和现在）”。
Birkbeck, University of London.
伦敦大学伯贝克学院。
Retrieved 10 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 10 日。
"Territorial Support Group".
“领土支持小组”。
Metropolitan Police Service.
大都会警察局。
Archived from the original on 12 April 2009.
原始存档于2009年4月12日。
Retrieved 4 April 2019.
检索日期：2019 年 4 月 4 日。
Investigation documents released by the Metropolitan Police Service
警视厅公布的调查文件
Blair: our brother, our friend by Paul Foot
布莱尔：我们的兄弟，我们的朋友 Paul Foot