Longreads Best of 2016: Political Analysis
We asked a few writers and editors to choose some of their favorite stories of the year in various categories.
我们请几位作家和编辑在不同类别中选择一些他们今年最喜欢的故事。
Here, the best in political analysis.
这里是最好的政治分析。
* * *
** **
Kiese Laymon
基塞·莱蒙
A Professor of English and Creative Writing at University of Mississippi, and author of forthcoming memoir, Heavy.
密西西比大学英语和创意写作教授，即将出版的回忆录《Heavy》的作者。
## The Trouble With the Liberal Arguments Against Third-Party Voters—and What to Do About It (Josie Duffy Rice, The Daily Kos)
## 自由派针对第三方选民的争论所带来的麻烦——以及如何应对（Josie Duffy Rice，The Daily Kos）
I got tired of reading about Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in 2016, especially when most pieces could be lumped in the For or Against piles.
2016 年，我厌倦了阅读有关希拉里·克林顿和唐纳德·特朗普的文章，尤其是当大多数文章都可以归为赞成或反对的时候。
But Josie Duffy consistently managed to make me think and feel not just what I hadn’t thought or felt, but what I tried to avoid thinking and feeling.
但乔西·达菲始终成功地让我思考和感受的不仅仅是我没有想到或感受过的东西，还有我试图避免思考和感受的东西。
Her piece, “The Trouble With Liberal Argument Against 3rd Party Candidates …” is amazing in its scope.
她的文章“自由派争论反对第三党候选人的麻烦……”的范围令人惊叹。
Josie is easily one of the most amazing young long-form essayists in the country.
乔西无疑是这个国家最令人惊叹的年轻长篇散文家之一。
In between evocatively presenting autobiography and political analysis, she dropped three sentences that made music out of American Presidential noise.
在令人回味地呈现自传和政治分析之间，她丢掉了三句话，让美国总统的噪音变得音乐起来。
“Listen,” she wrote, “I am a firm believer that in a country like America you should vote for your opponent.
“听着，”她写道，“我坚信，在美国这样的国家，你应该投票给你的对手。
Who do you want to fight against for the next eight years?
未来八年你想和谁对抗？
Who do you want to push left?” The piece, like most of Josie’s writing, welcomes us in, cares for us and asks everything of us when we leave.
你想把谁往左推？”就像乔西的大部分作品一样，这篇文章欢迎我们进来，关心我们，并在我们离开时询问我们的一切。
I can’t share this piece enough.
我无法充分分享这篇文章。
## Donald Trump: He Was Made in America (Kirsten West Savali, The Root)
## 唐纳德·特朗普：他是美国制造的（克尔斯滕·韦斯特·萨瓦利，《根》）
I don’t trust any journalist in the world more that Kirsten West Savali.
我不相信世界上任何记者比克尔斯滕·韦斯特·萨瓦利 (Kirsten West Savali) 更信任。
Her work is consistently daring, loving of vulnerable folk, unafraid of calling out all kinds of abuse and deeply Mississippi through and through.
她的作品一贯大胆，热爱弱势群体，不惧怕大声疾呼各种虐待，并且深深地融入了密西西比州。
Her piece, “Donald Trump: He Was Made in America” made clear to any one willing the listen what this nation was going to do on November 2.
她的文章《唐纳德·特朗普：他是美国制造的》向任何愿意倾听的人清楚地表明了这个国家在 11 月 2 日将要做什么。
She uses repetition in this piece in a way that is both haunting and aptly comical.
她在这部作品中以一种既令人难忘又恰如其分的滑稽方式使用重复。
In a world where many writers work as extensions of the pop left and pop right, writing like this pushed and prodded many of us to reckon with what American complicity means and does in 2016.
在当今世界，许多作家都是流行左派和流行右派的延伸，这样的写作促使我们许多人思考美国共谋在 2016 年意味着什么和做了什么。
Keith Gessen
基思·格森
A founder of n+1
n+1创始人
## Choosing a School for My Daughter in a Segregated City (Nikole Hannah-Jones, The New York Times Magazine)
## 在隔离城市为我的女儿选择一所学校（Nikole Hannah-Jones，纽约时报杂志）
I read this remarkable article just as our baby boy was turning one, which meant, in New York, that we had to start thinking about elementary schools.
我读到这篇精彩的文章时，我们的男婴即将满一岁，这意味着在纽约，我们必须开始考虑上小学的问题。
Although, not really—in fact the schools here change so quickly, as do the school zones, that thinking about it too much too early is probably a total waste of time.
虽然，事实并非如此——事实上，这里的学校和学区变化得如此之快，所以过早地考虑这个问题可能完全是浪费时间。
Nonetheless, this piece about the decision the author and her husband made with regard to their daughter introduced me to Hannah-Jones’s work, all of which deals with the persistence (and even, in the last twenty years, acceleration) of racial segregation in American life.
尽管如此，这篇关于作者和她丈夫对女儿做出的决定的文章向我介绍了汉娜·琼斯的作品，所有这些作品都涉及美国生活中种族隔离的持续存在（甚至在过去二十年中加速）。
Like all great writing, it puts words to phenomena that had been right before my eyes.
就像所有伟大的作品一样，它用文字描述了我眼前的现象。
## Sweet ’16: Notes on the US Election (Benjamin Kunkel, Salvage)
## Sweet ’16：美国大选笔记（Benjamin Kunkel，Salvage）
In the wake of the catastrophe of November 8, the media went into one of its favorite modes—self-flagellation—to suggest that, if only they had seen the Trump voters who kept thrusting themselves into their vision, they might have predicted the electoral outcome better.
11 月 8 日的灾难发生后，媒体进入了他们最喜欢的模式之一——自虐——暗示，如果他们看到特朗普选民不断地推进他们的愿景，他们可能会更好地预测选举结果。
As a person who had just spent a year reading all the reports by these in fact pretty conscientious journalists about the strange and exotic Trump voter—many more than I had read about, for example, the Bernie Sanders voter—I found this pretty odd.
作为一个刚刚花了一年时间阅读这些事实上相当认真的记者关于奇怪而异国情调的特朗普选民的所有报道的人——比我读到的关于伯尼·桑德斯选民的报道要多得多——我觉得这很奇怪。
Had they really not seen the Trump voters that they’d written so much about—or had they, instead, merely not understood what they were seeing?
他们真的没有看到他们写了这么多的特朗普选民吗？或者他们只是不明白他们所看到的是什么？
This essay by Benjamin Kunkel in the British leftist quarterly Salvage sets out the global context of economic crisis and stagnation against which the rise of Trump can actually be understood.
本杰明·昆克尔（Benjamin Kunkel）在英国左翼季刊《救助》（Salvage）上发表的这篇文章阐述了经济危机和停滞的全球背景，在这种背景下，特朗普的崛起实际上是可以理解的。
In a year of darkness and confusion, it gives off actual light—though it, too, predicts a victory for Hillary.
在黑暗和混乱的一年里，它发出了真正的光明——尽管它也预测了希拉里的胜利。
Seth Masket
赛斯·马斯克特
Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Denver, and the author of The Inevitable Party: Why Attempts to Kill the Party System Fail and How they Weaken Democracy
丹佛大学政治学系主任，《不可避免的政党：为什么试图杀死政党制度会失败以及它们如何削弱民主》一书的作者
## Trump May Bring A Republican Recalibration, Not A Realignment (Julia Azari, Five Thirty Eight)
## 特朗普可能会带来共和党的重新调整，而不是重新结盟（朱莉娅·阿扎里，五点三十八分）
This may be a tad wonky.
这可能有点奇怪。
Azari discusses how Donald Trump’s candidacy may affect the Republican Party and where that would fit into the history of America’s political parties.
阿扎里讨论了唐纳德·特朗普的候选资格可能如何影响共和党，以及这在美国政党历史中的地位。
She argues that, although Trump has run a very different sort of campaign than we’ve seen and incites emotions and fears that few other candidates do, there’s little evidence that his run will change the alignments of the parties.
她认为，尽管特朗普的竞选活动与我们所看到的截然不同，并且激起了其他候选人很少会做的情绪和恐惧，但几乎没有证据表明他的竞选会改变政党的联盟。
The parties seem to be fighting about the same basic issues that they were before his candidacy, and that system is proving remarkably endurable.
两党似乎正在就与他当选之前相同的基本问题进行斗争，而事实证明，这种制度非常耐用。
Marie Myung-Ok Lee
李明玉
A novelist and essayist who teaches at Columbia.
小说家和散文家，在哥伦比亚大学任教。
## Could Hillary Clinton Become the Champion of the 99%?
## 希拉里·克林顿能否成为 99% 的冠军？
(Gideon Lewis-Kraus, The New York Times Magazine)
（吉迪恩·刘易斯·克劳斯，《纽约时报》杂志）
This look at the Roosevelt Institute, a progressive think tank, suggests that Americans of many political persuasions actually want a Great Society and Rooseveltian vision for America—but would Hillary Clinton be able to win the allegiance of the so-called 99%?
对进步智库罗斯福研究所的观察表明，具有多种政治倾向的美国人实际上都希望有一个伟大的社会和罗斯福式的美国愿景，但希拉里·克林顿能否赢得所谓的 99% 的忠诚？
One random comment on the piece dated July 25 was eerily prescient:
对 7 月 25 日这篇文章的一条随意评论颇有先见之明：
“The Clinton brand of triangulation dictates that it’s impossible for her to become the champion of the 99 percent.
“克林顿式的三角测量决定了她不可能成为 99% 的人的冠军。
I hope I’m wrong, but we shall see…”
我希望我错了，但我们会看到……”
## Hillary Clinton vs. Herself (Rebecca Traister, New York Magazine)
## 希拉里·克林顿 vs. 自己（丽贝卡·特雷斯特，《纽约杂志》）
Hillary Clinton had serious, real flaws as a candidate, including her hawkish State Department record, but the misogyny she faced just by virtue of being a woman was real, too.
希拉里·克林顿作为候选人有严重的、真正的缺陷，包括她在国务院的鹰派记录，但她仅仅因为身为女性而面临的厌女症也是真实存在的。
In this piece, a classic of its form, Rebecca Traister limns the peaks and pitfalls of being the first female nominee of a major political party to run for president.
在这篇堪称经典的文章中，丽贝卡·特雷斯特 (Rebecca Traister) 描绘了作为主要政党第一位竞选总统的女性候选人的巅峰和陷阱。
## The Obama Administration Just Granted Henry Kissinger a Distinguished Public Service Award (Greg Grandin, The Nation)
## 奥巴马政府刚刚授予亨利·基辛格杰出公共服务奖（格雷格·格兰丁，《国家报》）
Trump aside, the political year 2016 reached peak weirdness with the reappearance and lionizing of Henry Kissinger.
抛开特朗普不谈，随着亨利·基辛格的再次出现和崇拜，2016 年的政治怪异达到了顶峰。
As Greg Grandin wrote in this piece, the penultimate moment of a man “implicated in at least three genocides (Cambodia, Bangladesh, and East Timor)” being given Department of Defense’s highest award for a private citizen showed how the Democrats’ strategy of triangulation from the Clinton years has transmogrified into some kind of M.C.
正如格雷格·格兰丁（Greg Grandin）在这篇文章中所写的那样，一个“参与至少三起种族灭绝（柬埔寨、孟加拉国和东帝汶）”的人被授予国防部对普通公民的最高奖项的倒数第二个时刻表明，民主党从克林顿时代开始的三角测量策略已经转变为某种MC。
Escher five-dimensional trapezoid, and why cognitive dissonance, not, say, income inequality, became the leitmotif for Democrats this election.
埃舍尔五维梯形，以及为什么认知失调，而不是收入不平等，成为民主党这次选举的主旋律。
Consider how protesters who follow Kissinger around shouting “War criminal!” are portrayed as the loonies by the press, when they’re actually the ones who are right.
想想那些跟随基辛格的抗议者如何高喊“战犯！”被媒体描绘成疯子，而实际上他们才是正确的人。
Mike Dang
迈克·邓
Longreads Editor-in-Chief and Editor at WordPress.com / Automattic.
Longreads 主编和 WordPress.com / Automattic 编辑。
## Revenge of the Forgotten Class (Alec MacGillis, ProPublica)
## 被遗忘阶级的复仇（Alec MacGillis，ProPublica）
In the days following the presidential election, as people began to make sense of the results, I focused my attention on a specific group of voters: those who had voted for Obama in the previous two elections but switched their vote to Trump in 2016.
在总统选举后的几天里，当人们开始理解结果时，我将注意力集中在一个特定的选民群体上：那些在前两次选举中投票给奥巴马但在 2016 年将投票转向特朗普的选民。
What was behind their reasoning?
他们的推理背后是什么？
Reporters set out to find out.
记者着手一探究竟。
This American Life’s Miki Meek spoke to two Latino police officers who said they didn’t like “how policing issues had been handled over the past few years” and Hillary Clinton’s support of Black Lives Matter, which they felt were anti-police.
《美国生活》的米基·米克采访了两名拉丁裔警察，他们表示，他们不喜欢“过去几年处理警务问题的方式”，也不喜欢希拉里·克林顿对“黑人生命也是命”的支持，他们认为这是反警察的。
Two days after the election, Alec MacGillis’ “Revenge of the Forgotten Class” gave me a greater understanding of what happened than any other piece I read.
选举两天后，亚历克·麦克吉利斯的《被遗忘阶级的复仇》比我读过的任何其他文章都让我对所发生的事情有了更深入的了解。
MacGillis visited the small towns and cities of the Rust Belt and spoke to several white workers about how they were voting.
麦吉利斯访问了铁锈地带的小镇和城市，并与几名白人工人谈论了他们的投票方式。
Tracie St. Martin, a 54-year-old heavy-construction worker from a staunch Democratic family, said she didn’t like President Obama’s demeanor, despite voting for him in 2008, and that the last few years had her feeling left behind.
特雷西·圣马丁 (Tracie St. Martin) 是一位来自坚定的民主党家庭的 54 岁重型建筑工人，她表示，尽管她在 2008 年投票给了奥巴马总统，但她不喜欢他的举止，而且过去几年她的感觉被抛在了后面。
“I wanted people like me to be cared about.
“我希望像我这样的人受到关心。
People don’t realize there’s nothing without a blue-collar worker.” Another white worker, 33-year-old Navy veteran Brian Osbourne, similarly felt forgotten.
人们没有意识到没有蓝领工人就什么都不是。”另一位白人工人、33 岁的海军退伍军人布莱恩·奥斯本 (Brian Osbourne) 也同样感到被遗忘。
He felt that the country spent too much time being “politically correct” while the local economy still had “a lot of people working jobs that they’re overqualified for.” While Trump’s string of controversies took up much of the headlines, these Rust Belt voters worried about their livelihoods, and the Democratic party seemed to take little notice.
他认为，这个国家花了太多时间在“政治正确”上，而当地经济仍然有“很多人从事着资历过高的工作”。虽然特朗普的一系列争议占据了大部分头条新闻，但这些铁锈地带选民担心他们的生计，而民主党似乎没有注意到。
Michelle Weber
米歇尔·韦伯
Longreads Senior Editor and Editor at WordPress.com / Automattic.
Longreads 高级编辑和 WordPress.com / Automattic 编辑。
## Hillary Clinton vs. Herself (Rebecca Traister, New York Magazine)
## 希拉里·克林顿 vs. 自己（丽贝卡·特雷斯特，《纽约杂志》）
Rebecca Traister is one of my favorite writers, and this profile-slash-exploration of Hillary Clinton the politician vs. Hillary Clinton the person shows why.
丽贝卡·特雷斯特 (Rebecca Traister) 是我最喜欢的作家之一，这篇对政治家希拉里·克林顿 (Hillary Clinton) 与个人希拉里·克林顿 (Hillary Clinton) 的侧面探索说明了原因。
Each word is perfectly chosen.
每个词都经过精心挑选。
The flow and pacing are flawless.
流程和节奏都完美无缺。
Sympathy is expertly balanced with critique; writers Traister, “To be near her is to feel like the campaign is in steady hands; to be at any distance is to fear for the fate of the republic.” My favorite thing about the piece, though, are the little details throughout that give life and warmth to both the subject and the profile as a whole: the description of a sofa.
同情与批评巧妙地平衡；作家特雷斯特说：“靠近她，就会感觉竞选活动掌握在手中；远离她，就会担心共和国的命运。”不过，这篇文章中我最喜欢的一点是贯穿始终的小细节，它们给主题和整体形象带来了生命和温暖：对沙发的描述。
Of Clinton popping a lozenge into her mouth before a stump speech.
克林顿在竞选演讲前将一颗含片塞进嘴里。
Or her breakfast.
或者她的早餐。
Of her subtle shifts in tone or expression.
她的语气或表情的微妙变化。
They’re not always flattering — “‘If black and Latino voters come out and vote, we could win Texas,’ she told me firmly, practically licking her lips.” — but they give the essay and the candidate humanity, and keep what is quite a long piece grounded and relevant.
他们并不总是奉承——“‘如果黑人和拉丁裔选民出来投票，我们就能赢得德克萨斯州’，她坚定地告诉我，几乎是在舔嘴唇。” ——但他们赋予了这篇文章和候选人人性，并让这篇相当长的文章保持了基础和相关性。
It’s politics as people, not just analysis.
这是人的政治，而不仅仅是分析。
Even if you are a die-hard anti-Clintonite I urge you to read it, if only to enjoy some excellent work by a writer at the top of her game.
即使你是一个顽固的反克林顿派，我也强烈建议你阅读这本书，哪怕只是为了欣赏一位处于巅峰的作家的优秀作品。
Mark Armstrong
马克·阿姆斯特朗
Founder, Longreads.
长读创始人。
## Autocracy: Rules for Survival (Masha Gessen, The New York Review of Books)
## 专制：生存规则（Masha Gessen，《纽约书评》）
It almost seems like this year’s political analysis needed to be broken into two phases: the period of incredulous disbelief before November 8 that Trump was a real candidate at all (versus a businessman cannily exploiting the worst attributes of the Republican party to boost his Twitter following), and the shock of this past month, where we start to realize what happened.
今年的政治分析似乎需要分为两个阶段：11 月 8 日之前，人们难以置信地相信特朗普根本不是真正的候选人（而不是一个商人，精明地利用共和党最糟糕的属性来增加他的 Twitter 粉丝）；而在过去一个月的震惊中，我们开始意识到发生了什么。
Now, the only thing I remember at all in 2016 is Masha Gessen, two days later, writing this at The New York Review of Books.
现在，我在 2016 年唯一记得的就是玛莎·格森 (Masha Gessen)，两天后，她在《纽约书评》上写下了这篇文章。
Gessen, the Russian-American journalist and author of 2016’s The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin, has been producing outstanding reporting from Russian for years now, but it took on a whole new meaning in the 2016 presidential race.
格森是一位俄裔美国记者，也是 2016 年出版的《没有面孔的人：弗拉基米尔·普京的不可能崛起》一书的作者，多年来一直在撰写来自俄罗斯的出色报道，但在 2016 年总统竞选中，它被赋予了全新的含义。
In 2014, Longreads featured a chapter from Gay Propaganda, a collection of stories co-edited by Gessen about what it’s like to be gay in Russia.
2014 年，Longreads 精选了《同性恋宣传》中的一章，这是由格森共同编辑的故事集，讲述了俄罗斯同性恋的感受。
Is this our future?
这就是我们的未来吗？
How can we prepare, and how can America fight to protect its democracy?
我们如何做好准备，美国如何努力保护其民主？
Read Gessen on the jailing of the Pussy Riot protesters in Harper’s, and on what it’s like to be a journalist in Russia.
阅读格森关于《哈泼斯杂志》对 Pussy Riot 抗议者的监禁，以及在俄罗斯做一名记者的感受。
In July, as questions continued about Putin’s relationship with Trump and Russian hackers’ roles in hacking Democratic party emails, she explained: “That’s what the recent Putin fixation is like—a way to evade the fact that Trump is a thoroughly American creation that poses an existential threat to American democracy.”
7月，当人们继续质疑普京与特朗普的关系以及俄罗斯黑客在黑客入侵民主党电子邮件中所扮演的角色时，她解释道：“这就是最近对普京的迷恋——这是一种逃避事实的方式，即特朗普是彻头彻尾的美国创造物，对美国民主构成了生存威胁。”
We can now see that horse race coverage was (once again) a total waste of time, and the best political reporting is everything else — like the political consequences of a casual phone call with the president of the Philippines and his government’s massacre of people in its streets.
我们现在可以看到，赛马报道（再一次）完全是浪费时间，而最好的政治报道就是其他一切——比如与菲律宾总统的一次随意通话以及他的政府在街头屠杀人民的政治后果。
Did Trump really invite Duterte to the White House?
特朗普真的邀请杜特尔特入主白宫吗？
That can’t be true, can it?
这不可能是真的，不是吗？
And now I hear Gessen again, reminding me: “This will happen often: humans seem to have evolved to practice denial when confronted publicly with the unacceptable.”
现在我又听到格森提醒我：“这种情况会经常发生：人类似乎已经进化到在公开面对不可接受的事情时会进行否认。”
Sari Botton
纱丽波顿
Writer, contributing editor to Longreads, editorial director of the non-profit TMI Project, and owner of Kingston Writers’ Studio.
作家、Longreads 的特约编辑、非营利组织 TMI 项目的编辑总监以及 Kingston Writers’ Studio 的所有者。
## Hillary Clinton Didn’t Shatter the Glass Ceiling.
## 希拉里·克林顿没有打破玻璃天花板。
This Is What Broke Instead.(Rebecca Traister, New York Magazine)
这才是真正的崩溃。（丽贝卡·特雷斯特，《纽约杂志》）
This was a sobering piece to read in the days after the 2016 presidential election, and is no less so more than a month later.
这篇文章在 2016 年总统选举后的几天里读起来发人深省，在一个多月后也同样如此。
Rebecca Traister—whose first book, Big Girls Don’t Cry: The Election that Changed Everything for American Women—considered the implications of Hillary Clinton’s loss to Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary—tries to make sense of Clinton’s surprise loss to Donald Trump, and the potential threat to recent progress toward greater inclusion and representation for women and minorities.
丽贝卡·特雷斯特 (Rebecca Traister) 的第一本书《大女孩别哭：改变美国女性一切的选举》考虑了希拉里·克林顿 (Hillary Clinton) 在 2008 年民主党初选中输给巴拉克·奥巴马 (Barack Obama) 的影响，她试图理解希拉里·克林顿 (Hillary Clinton) 意外输给唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump) 的后果，以及最近在提高妇女和少数族裔包容性和代表性方面取得的进展所面临的潜在威胁。
The resounding, surprising, data-defying victory of a man who ran on open racism and misogyny, and was voted into office by 63 percent of white men and 53 percent of white women voters, was made possible by voters threatened by the increased influence of women and people of color.
一个以公开的种族主义和厌女症参选的男人，以 63% 的白人男性选民和 53% 的白人女性选民投票当选，取得了令人震惊的、令人惊讶的、违背数据的胜利，而选民因受到女性和有色人种影响力日益增强的威胁而成为可能。
## My President Was Black (Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Atlantic)
## 我的总统是黑人（Ta-Nehisi Coates，大西洋月刊）
An in-depth profile of Barack Obama and a look at his eight years not just as president, but as America’s first black president.
深入介绍巴拉克·奥巴马 (Barack Obama)，回顾他作为总统以及美国第一位黑人总统的八年经历。
Ta Nehisi-Coates looks at the factors behind the Obama’s unique brand of optimism, which helped propel him as a politician—and also helped him to grossly miscalculate the results of the 2016 presidential election.
塔内西斯-科茨探讨了奥巴马独特的乐观主义背后的因素，这种乐观主义有助于推动他成为一名政治家，同时也帮助他严重错误地估计了 2016 年总统选举的结果。
## History classes are our best hope for teaching Americans to question fake news and Donald Trump (Marie Myung-Ok Lee, Quartz Magazine)
## 历史课是我们教导美国人质疑假新闻和唐纳德·特朗普的最大希望（Marie Myung-Ok Lee，Quartz 杂志）
Novelist Marie Myung-Ok Lee argues in favor of college history classes—which fewer students are enrolling in.
小说家玛丽·明玉·李 (Marie Myung-Ok Lee) 主张开设大学历史课程，但参加该课程的学生较少。
She points out that studying history helps us to understand and apply critical thinking to current events, and also to detect fictions in news reporting.
她指出，研究历史有助于我们理解并将批判性思维应用于时事，也有助于我们发现新闻报道中的虚构内容。
History classes maybe be more important than ever, she says, now that we have a president-elect who has little interest in history—or facts.
她说，既然我们有一位对历史或事实毫无兴趣的当选总统，历史课可能比以往任何时候都更加重要。
See more from our Best of 2016 series
查看我们的 2016 年最佳系列的更多内容