Ross Douthat on Narrative and Religion (Ep. 32 - Live at Mason)
Good evening, everyone.
大家晚上好。
Ross is the youngest person ever to have been an op-ed columnist for the New York Times.
罗斯是《纽约时报》有史以来最年轻的专栏作家。
You had to start there.
你必须从那里开始。
He is one of our best and most important thinkers.
他是我们最好、最重要的思想家之一。
And in March he has a new book coming out called To Change the Church: Pope Francis and the Future of Catholicism.
三月份,他出版了一本新书,名为《改变教会:教皇方济各和天主教的未来》。
And, just to make this clear, this is the conversation with Ross I want to have, not the one you want to have.
而且,为了澄清这一点,这是我想要与罗斯进行的对话,而不是你想要进行的对话。
Ross, welcome, thank you.
罗斯,欢迎,谢谢。
Thank you, Tyler.
谢谢你,泰勒。
It’s good to be here.
很高兴来到这里。
On Christology leading to individual liberty
论导致个人自由的基督论
I’d like to start with something quite esoteric.
我想从一些非常深奥的事情开始。
Now, to prepare for you, I was reading the Calvinist theologian Rushdoony.
现在,为了给你们做准备,我正在阅读加尔文主义神学家拉什杜尼的著作。
And he argues the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD actually enabled liberty through its Christology.
他认为公元 451 年的迦克墩会议实际上通过其基督论实现了自由。
The notion that you embed in Christianity — salvation through grace, rather than through self-deification — and this ends up meaning the state is not the savior, and the church and state thus eventually end up as opposing principles.
你在基督教中植入的观念是“通过恩典而不是通过自我神化来拯救”,这最终意味着国家不是救世主,教会和国家最终成为对立的原则。
And this is a kind of foundation for later individual liberty.
这也是后来个人自由的一种基础。
Now, as someone who’s both Catholic and who has an interest in conservative and liberty-related ideas, what is your take on that account?
现在,作为一个既是天主教徒又对保守和自由相关思想感兴趣的人,您对此有何看法?
Sometimes I’m persuaded by a version of it, and sometimes I’m not.
有时我会被它的某个版本说服,有时却不会。
I think that there is a very natural story to tell about Western civilization, in which particular Christian ideas about the individual, the individual’s relationship to God, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s,” and so on — that these sort of embedded ideas eventually develop into the constituent forms of modern liberal democracy.
我认为,关于西方文明有一个非常自然的故事,其中关于个人、个人与上帝的关系、“凯撒的归凯撒”等特定的基督教观念——这些根深蒂固的观念最终发展成为现代自由民主的构成形式。
And, in that story, you could argue either that liberal democracy is a kind of happy development out of original Christian ideas and Christian thoughts, or that it is a kind of rebellious stepchild who has sort of taken over the house and banished the parent to the attic.
而且,在那个故事中,你可以说自由民主是一种从原始基督教思想和基督教思想中得到的幸福发展,或者它是一种叛逆的继子,他接管了房子,把父母驱逐到阁楼。
And I guess those are views that I toggle back and forth between, depending on what seems like the state of Western liberalism at any particular moment.
我想我会在这些观点之间来回切换,具体取决于西方自由主义在任何特定时刻的状态。
So, as a Catholic, you have a kind of intermediate view on how important works are for grace.
因此,作为一名天主教徒,你对行为对于恩典的重要性有一种中间看法。
So you would reject the views of Calvin and Luther .
所以你会拒绝加尔文和路德的观点。
.
。
.
。
Absolutely.
绝对地。
— that it’s strictly determined by God, but the Pelagian heresy that there is no original sin —
— 它是由上帝严格决定的,但伯拉纠异端认为没有原罪—
Right.
对。
— that also is unacceptable to you.
——这对你来说也是无法接受的。
That would lead you to Mormonism, or something else.
那会引导你走向摩门教,或者其他什么。
What makes that intermediate position so compelling to you?
是什么让这个中间职位对您如此有吸引力?
And is it in some way an underlying feature of how you think about politics?
在某种程度上,这是否是您看待政治的基本特征?
I’ve never been asked that question.
我从来没有被问过这个问题。
I suppose that I’m drawn to the idea that the truth about human existence lies in what can seem like paradoxical formulations, and this is of course very Catholic in certain ways.
我想我被这样的想法所吸引,即人类存在的真相在于看似矛盾的表述,这在某些方面当然是非常天主教徒的。
Certainly a G.
当然是G。
K.
K.
Chestertonian idea, so I’m just stealing it from other people.
切斯特顿式的想法,所以我只是从其他人那里偷来的。
But the idea that various heresies of Christianity, Calvinism included — with apologies to my Calvinist friends — tend to take one particular element of you that’s supposed to be in synthesis and possibly in tension, and run with it.
但是,基督教的各种异端思想,包括加尔文主义——“向我的加尔文主义朋友们道歉”——倾向于采取你身上的一个特定元素,它应该是综合的,并且可能处于紧张状态,并与之一起运行。
And therefore the truth about things lies in a place that may seem slightly contradictory.
因此,事物的真相存在于一个看似有些矛盾的地方。
And I think this is borne out in many ways in everyday experience.
我认为这一点在日常生活的很多方面都得到了证实。
This both-and experience of human existence.
这两者都是人类存在的体验。
The idea that you can’t split up grace and works in any kind of meaningful way.
你不能分割恩典并以任何有意义的方式工作的想法。
It’s connected to larger facts about the nature of human existence.
它与有关人类存在本质的更大事实有关。
The tension between determinism and free will that persists in any philosophical system.
决定论和自由意志之间的紧张关系在任何哲学体系中都存在。
You can get rid of God and stop having these Jansenist Jesuit arguments about predestination and so on, but you’re still stuck with the free will–determinism debate.
你可以摆脱上帝并停止这些詹森主义耶稣会关于预定论等的争论,但你仍然陷入自由意志决定论的辩论中。
That debate doesn’t go away.
这场争论并没有消失。
So, yeah, there’s a point at the intersection of different ideas that is as close to the truth as our limited minds can get and in Christian thought, we call that point orthodoxy.
所以,是的,在不同思想的交叉点上有一个点,它与我们有限的头脑所能得到的最接近真理,在基督教思想中,我们称之为正统。
Now, how that is connected to my political views is a really good question.
现在,这与我的政治观点有何联系是一个非常好的问题。
I think that a lot of the time, in politics, I suppose, I am — in certain areas of our politics, I’m looking for that point, I guess you could say.
我认为很多时候,在政治中,我想,我——在我们政治的某些领域,我正在寻找那个点,我想你可能会说。
But that’s mostly true in .
但这在大多数情况下都是正确的。
.
。
.
。
No, I guess it’s true in a lot of places.
不,我想在很多地方都是如此。
I think that the solution to .
我认为解决方案是 .
.
。
.
。
(maybe now we’re into more Hegelian territory rather than Christian territory), but there’s a solution to a lot of problems in some as-yet-uncertain synthesis.
(也许现在我们更多地进入了黑格尔的领域,而不是基督教的领域),但是在一些尚未确定的综合中,有很多问题的解决方案。
So I write a lot about social conservatism and abortion and feminism, and these kind of issues.
所以我写了很多关于社会保守主义、堕胎和女权主义等问题的文章。
And I do think that somewhere out there, in that zone of argument, there is a synthesis of the best social conservative ideas and the best feminist insights that I personally haven’t been able to grasp yet, and probably I’m not necessarily equipped to do so, and also that our society as a whole hasn’t grasped, but that that is where the actual truth lies.
我确实认为,在那个争论领域的某个地方,存在着最好的社会保守主义思想和最好的女权主义见解的综合体,我个人还没有能够理解,而且可能我不一定有能力这样做,而且我们整个社会还没有理解,但这就是真正的真相所在。
And you can distill it in certain slogan-ready ways, like saying, “Well, you need a more feminist pro-life movement,” or something like that.
你可以用某些口号式的方式提炼它,比如说,“好吧,你需要一场更加女权主义的反堕胎运动”,或者类似的话。
And those slogans only get you partway there.
这些口号只能让你成功一半。
But I do think that that idea of synthesis is somewhat important to the somewhat speculative political writing that I do.
但我确实认为这种综合的想法对于我所做的有些投机性的政治写作来说有些重要。
But, as you know, there’s a tendency within Catholicism to try to use Hegelian arguments to push a very liberal version of Catholicism.
但是,如你所知,天主教内部有一种倾向,试图利用黑格尔的论点来推动非常自由的天主教版本。
“Well, this thing is going to keep on evolving, there’s no end to the process” — so we can get away from your idea of Catholicism as spanning the generations — as something continuous and unified.
“嗯,这件事会继续发展,这个过程没有尽头” ——所以我们可以摆脱你认为天主教跨越几代人的想法—— 作为一种连续和统一的东西。
Are you worried you’ll become too Hegelian, or are you not yet Hegelian enough?
您是否担心自己会变得过于黑格尔派,或者您还不够黑格尔派?
I think the Hegelian insight can be true in the development of political forms and responses to problems that social changes create, problems that basic technological changes create, and you can hold that view while also holding the view that the Hegelian dialectic can’t be usefully applied to certain ideas and certain truths, and you can take extreme examples and say there isn’t a synthesis to be had with — to violate Godwin’s law early in our conversation — there isn’t a synthesis to be had with Nazi Germany.
我认为黑格尔的洞察力在政治形式的发展和对社会变革所产生的问题、基本技术变革所产生的问题的反应中是正确的,你可以持有这种观点,同时也认为黑格尔辩证法不能有效地应用于某些思想和某些真理,你可以举出极端的例子并说没有一个综合可以与 - 在我们谈话的早期就违反戈德温定律 - 没有一个综合可以与纳粹德国有过接触。
There are certain ideas about racial hierarchies and so on that are not part of some synthesis that you need to work through and grasp.
关于种族等级制度等的某些想法不是您需要理解和掌握的某些综合的一部分。
And then to be a Catholic, I think, is to believe that there is a larger body of revealed truths that have to remain as a grounding for civilization, Christian civilization, and so on, even as you grow forward towards programmatic, practical solutions and sociological solutions to new problems that emerge.
然后,我认为,成为一名天主教徒,就是要相信,有更多的已揭示的真理必须保留下来,作为文明、基督教文明等的基础,即使你朝着针对出现的新问题提出纲领性的、实用的解决方案和社会学解决方案的方向发展。
On the Old Testament
论旧约
We all know the Marcionite heresy: the view, from early Christianity, that the Old Testament should be abandoned.
我们都知道马吉安派异端:来自早期基督教的观点,即旧约应该被抛弃。
At times, even Paul seems to subscribe to what later was called the Marcionite heresy.
有时,甚至保罗似乎也赞同后来被称为马吉安派的异端。
Why is it a heresy?
为什么说它是异端呢?
Why is it wrong?
为什么错了?
It’s wrong because it takes the form .
这是错误的,因为它采用的形式是 .
.
。
.
。
It’s wrong for any number of reasons, but in the context of the conversation we’re having, it’s wrong because it tries to basically take one of the things that Christianity is trying to hold in synthesis and run with it to the exclusion of everything else, and essentially to solve problems by cutting things away.
出于多种原因,它是错误的,但在我们正在进行的对话的背景下,它是错误的,因为它基本上试图将基督教试图保持的事物之一综合起来,并与它一起运行,排除其他一切,本质上是通过削减事物来解决问题。
The Marcionite thesis is, basically, if you read the New Testament, Jesus offers you a portrait of God that seems different from the portrait of God offered in Deuteronomy; therefore, these things are in contradiction.
马吉安派的论点基本上是,如果你读过新约,耶稣为你提供了一幅上帝的肖像,这似乎与申命记中提供的上帝的肖像不同;因此,这些事情是矛盾的。
Therefore, if you believe that Jesus’s portrait of God is correct, then the Deuteronomic portrait of God must be false; therefore, the God of the Old Testament must be a wicked demiurge, etc., etc. And the next thing you know, you’re ascribing to, again, a kind of .
因此,如果你相信耶稣对神的描绘是正确的,那么申命记中对神的描绘一定是错误的;因此,《旧约》中的上帝一定是一个邪恶的造物主,等等。接下来你知道的事情,你再次归因于一种……。
.
。
.
。
What is the Aryan Christianity of the Nazis, if not the Marcionite heresy given form in the 1930s and 1940s?
如果不是 20 世纪 30 年代和 1940 年代形成的马吉安异端,那纳粹的雅利安基督教又是什么?
And so the orthodox Christian says, “No, any seeming tension between the Old Testament and the New, any seeming contradiction, is actually suggesting that we need to look for a kind of synthesis between them, and for a sense in which there is not contradiction, but fulfillment in some way, which —
因此,正统基督徒说:“不,旧约和新约之间任何表面上的张力,任何表面上的矛盾,实际上都表明我们需要在它们之间寻找一种综合,并寻找一种不存在矛盾,而是以某种方式实现的感觉,这——
Bringing us back to Hegelian Douthat.
让我们回到黑格尔的杜塔特。
Yes, yes.
是的,是的。
Now to prepare for —
现在准备——
Right, no, no, and you’re absolutely right, there is a kind of .
是的,不,不,你是绝对正确的,有一种。
.
。
.
。
In order to get to the orthodoxy of Nicaea and Chalcedon, there is a sense in which there’s a kind of Hegelian fulfillment.
为了达到尼西亚和卡尔西顿的正统,某种意义上来说,存在着一种黑格尔式的实现。
The issue there, though, is just that the orthodox Christian believes that at a certain point the revelation is actually final, that God essentially doesn’t play tricks on you.
然而,问题在于,正统基督徒相信,在某个时刻,启示实际上是最终的,上帝本质上不会欺骗你。
And this is I think an important idea — that too much Hegelianism leads you to the point where you’re saying, “Well, what God is saying in one era just doesn’t hold true in another.” And that gets you to a point where there’s a kind of a dishonesty, I think, necessarily imputed to God in that scenario, that he’s sort of withholding .
我认为这是一个重要的想法——过多的黑格尔主义会导致你说:“好吧,上帝在一个时代所说的在另一个时代并不成立。”我认为,这会让你陷入一种不诚实的境地,在这种情况下,必然归咎于上帝,而他在某种程度上有所保留。
.
。
.
。
He’s giving you a revelation, but he’s constantly withholding for the future, and I think the God that I would prefer to believe in does give .
他正在给你一个启示,但他不断地为未来保留,而我认为我更愿意相信的上帝确实给予了。
.
。
.
。
When he says he’s giving final answers, he actually means it.
当他说他给出最终答案时,他确实是这么想的。
On the New Testament
关于新约
To prepare for this conversation, I read some more Catholic theology.
为了准备这次谈话,我读了更多天主教神学。
So I read Hans Urs von Balthasar, Karl Rahner, Yves Congar, Hans Küng, Edward Schillebeeckx —
所以我读了 Hans Urs von Balthasar、Karl Rahner、Yves Congar、Hans Küng、Edward Schillebeeckx —
You’re way ahead of me, then.
那你就比我领先了。
— others.
—— 其他。
But let me give you my impression, and I hope this doesn’t offend anyone.
但让我给你我的印象,我希望这不会冒犯任何人。
It mostly really bored me.
这主要让我感到无聊。
But, when I went back and reread parts of the Bible, the New Testament, it didn’t bore me at all.
但是,当我回去重读《圣经》、《新约》的部分内容时,我一点也不感到厌烦。
It was absolutely fascinating, gripping — wanted to go back and read it yet again.
这绝对令人着迷、扣人心弦——想回去再读一遍。
Now, given that theology comes through the church, is this not in some way evidence for a version of Protestantism being correct, or do you have a different reaction to these texts?
现在,考虑到神学是通过教会而来的,这是否在某种程度上证明新教版本是正确的,或者你对这些文本有不同的反应吗?
Is it all right to say that I have a similar reaction to many of them?
可以说我对他们中的许多人都有类似的反应吗?
Or will that —
或者会——
I mean, that’s a dangerous thing to say, because, in my position as a sort of hack journalist who writes about Catholic controversies, I’m often getting criticized by professional theologians for lacking adequate theological training, and so forth, so if I admit that I find many theologians dense and boring, that will be used against me when my book comes out in a few months.
我的意思是,这样说是一件危险的事情,因为,作为一名撰写有关天主教争议的黑客记者,我经常受到专业神学家的批评,因为我缺乏足够的神学训练,等等,所以如果我承认我发现许多神学家既晦涩又无聊,那么当我的书在几个月后出版时,这将用来对付我。
But I guess it’s too late.
但我想已经太晚了。
So, having said that — no, I think that the heart of Catholicism is found in the link between the New Testament and the form and structure and ordinary life of the church.
所以,话虽这么说——不,我认为天主教的核心在于新约与教会的形式、结构和日常生活之间的联系。
And what theologians are doing is very important, but it is far from the most interesting and essential part of the Catholic project.
神学家正在做的事情非常重要,但这远不是天主教项目中最有趣和最重要的部分。
So, to the extent that there is an aha moment for someone thinking intellectually about the connection between the New Testament and the Catholic Church, it should come in the experience of looking at the Eucharist, looking at what goes on in Catholic churches every day around the world, and connecting that to the startling and shocking and scandalous things that Jesus says about his body and blood in the New Testament, connecting it to the form of the Last Supper, connecting it to that story.
因此,如果有人从理智上思考新约和天主教会之间的联系,就会有一个顿悟的时刻,它应该来自于观看圣体圣事的经历,看看世界各地天主教堂每天发生的事情,并将其与耶稣在新约中所说的关于他的身体和血的令人震惊、震惊和可耻的事情联系起来,将其与最后的晚餐的形式联系起来,与那个故事联系起来。
And the theological commentary on all of this can be fascinating and theological controversies can be very interesting, but that, to me, the .
对所有这些的神学评论可能很有趣,神学争议也可能非常有趣,但对我来说,……
.
。
.
。
Really, the heart of the connection between Catholicism as a religion and the startling, striking world of the New Testament lies more in liturgical life, the lives of the saints, the sort of everyday stuff of the Catholic Church rather than the abstract arguments.
事实上,天主教作为一种宗教与新约中令人震惊的世界之间的联系的核心更多地在于礼仪生活,圣徒的生活,天主教会的日常用品,而不是抽象的论点。
I’ll also say that the post-’60s Catholic theologians are also maybe a little more dense in certain ways.
我还要说,60 年代后的天主教神学家在某些方面可能也更密集一些。
There’s a good piece by Rusty Reno, who’s the editor of First Things, that he wrote a little while ago, arguing that a lot of those Catholic theologians, the ones that you read, it sounds like they’re working as critics of a sort of existing Thomistic, Thomas Aquinas–rooted foundation in Catholic theology that they felt had gotten very stale and very boring.
《第一件事》的编辑拉斯蒂·雷诺(Rusty Reno)不久前写了一篇好文章,他认为很多天主教神学家,你读到的那些,听起来像是他们正在批评天主教神学中现有的托马斯主义、托马斯·阿奎那基础,他们觉得这些基础已经变得非常陈旧和无聊。
And they were right, I think, in certain ways.
我认为他们在某些方面是对的。
But the problem is they’re also writing as if on the assumption that their reader understands this foundation that they’re operating in a landscape of critique and commentary and so on, that assumes a kind of 1880s or 1940s Catholic education in their readers.
但问题是,他们在写作时就好像假设他们的读者理解他们是在批评和评论等的环境中运作的,这假设他们的读者接受了 1880 年代或 1940 年代的天主教教育。
And so the collapse which they hastened in certain ways of that Thomistic consensus means that in certain ways their works don’t make that much sense, that they’re sort of driving forward, but there’s a missing synthesis that you need to sort of understand what they’re driving at sometimes.
因此,他们在某些方面加速了托马斯主义共识的崩溃,这意味着在某些方面他们的作品没有多大意义,他们在推动前进,但缺少一个综合,你需要理解他们有时在推动什么。
But again, that’s a more theologically learned take than my own, which sometimes matches yours.
但同样,这比我自己的观点更具神学学识,有时与你的观点相符。
On theology through narrative
通过叙述论神学
Let me ask you my number-one question about you, and maybe it’s too big a question for you to answer, but it’s what I’ve been thinking about for the last few weeks.
让我问你关于你的第一个问题,也许这个问题对你来说太大了,无法回答,但这是我过去几周一直在思考的问题。
The apparent — I wouldn’t say lack of interest in theology, but you don’t write about theology much in its theological aspects.
表面上的——我不会说你对神学缺乏兴趣,但你在神学方面写的很少。
Maybe a part of the sociological narrative.
也许是社会学叙事的一部分。
But what strikes me rereading everything you’ve written as a whole is how interested you are —
但重读你写的所有内容让我印象深刻的是你是多么感兴趣——
God help you, man.
上帝帮助你,伙计。
— in aesthetics, in narrative, film, television, and novels — that this is elevated.
——在美学、叙事、电影、电视和小说中——这一点得到了提升。
So if you read St. Augustine, as you know, in the Confessions, he’s very skeptical about theater.
所以,如果你读过圣奥古斯丁的《忏悔录》,你就会知道,他对戏剧非常怀疑。
It’s potentially a form of idolatry; it distracts people from God.
这可能是一种偶像崇拜;它会分散人们对神的注意力。
And theology is weaker in your approach and narrative and aesthetics are stronger.
你的方法中神学较弱,叙事和美学较强。
And this strikes me ultimately as a kind of theological decision.
这最终让我觉得这是一种神学决定。
So in the Catholicism of you, what’s the theological basis of narrative and aesthetic themselves being elevated over theology?
那么,在您的天主教信仰中,叙事和美学本身被提升到神学之上的神学基础是什么?
That’s what’s been bugging me.
这就是一直困扰我的事情。
OK.
好的。
And maybe if you could address that, I would be happy.
也许如果你能解决这个问题,我会很高兴。
I’ll venture a theory, again, about something that I haven’t thought about before you raised it 30 seconds ago.
我将再次冒险提出一个理论,关于一些在你 30 秒前提出之前我从未想过的事情。
So please take this with a grain of salt.
所以请对此持保留态度。
I think that you could make the argument that narrativity is the way in which God has revealed himself in the world from a Christian perspective, from a Judeo-Christian perspective.
我认为你可以提出这样的论点:叙事是上帝从基督教的角度、犹太基督教的角度向世界揭示自己的方式。
You know the Old and New Testaments contain a lot of theologizing, but they are, above all, narratives.
你知道《旧约》和《新约》包含很多神学内容,但它们首先是叙述。
They are stories of a chosen people.
它们是一个被选中的人的故事。
They are travails and betrayals and wars, and miseries, and judgments, and all the rest.
它们是痛苦、背叛、战争、苦难、审判,等等。
And then there’s a story in the New Testament that is, as the cliché goes, the greatest story ever told.
新约中有一个故事,正如俗话所说,是有史以来最伟大的故事。
And I mean I think you’re right about me — when I read the New Testament, I want to read the gospels much more than I want to read St. Paul.
我的意思是,我认为你对我的看法是对的 —— 当我读《新约》时,我更想读福音书,而不是读《圣保罗》。
And I find the gospels much more interesting than St. Paul, and that’s obviously not true of everybody, or we wouldn’t have been having wars about what Paul meant in Christianity for the last 2,000 years.
我发现福音书比圣保罗书更有趣,显然不是每个人都这样,否则我们就不会在过去的 2000 年里为保罗在基督教中的含义而争论不休。
But I think to the extent that I would defend my own instincts and my own approach — sometimes I say this to my children when I’m clumsily trying to indoctrinate them in my faith; I say “you are living inside a story, and God is the storyteller.” And again, this is not a thought original to me at all, but God is the storyteller and you are an actor within that story.
但我认为,在某种程度上,我会捍卫自己的本能和自己的方法——“有时,当我笨拙地试图向我的孩子们灌输我的信仰时,我会对他们说这句话;”我说“你生活在一个故事里,而上帝是讲故事的人。”再说一次,这根本不是我原创的想法,但上帝是故事讲述者,而你是这个故事中的演员。
And the difference is that in this story, God, Christians would say, God himself enters the story: he becomes a character in the play, which is a very difficult thing for a playwright to normally do.
不同的是,在这个故事里,上帝,基督徒会说,上帝亲自进入了故事:他成为了剧中的一个角色,这对于剧作家来说通常是一件很难做到的事情。
But that story, the fact that God is a storyteller, tells us something reasonable about how best to approach him and that it is not just OK, but completely plausible to approach him through narrative, through poetry, through art, through stories, and so on.
但这个故事,即上帝是一个讲故事的人,告诉我们如何最好地接近他,这是合理的,并且通过叙事、诗歌、艺术、故事等来接近他不仅可以,而且完全合理。
And there is a sense — I think this idea I’m stealing from Alan Jacobs, who wrote a biography of C.
有一种感觉 —— 我认为这个想法是从艾伦·雅各布斯那里偷来的,他写了一本 C.
S.
S。
Lewis — but I think there’s a real sense in which — and maybe this speaks to the failure of Western theology over the last 50 years — but Christians in the West, in the United States — well-educated, would-be intellectual Christians — tend to be heavily influenced by storytellers, heavily influenced by Lewis, heavily influenced by J.
刘易斯 ——但我认为有一种真正的意义——也许这说明了西方神学在过去50年的失败 ——但是西方的基督徒,在美国——“受过良好教育的、未来的知识分子基督徒”——往往深受讲故事的人的影响,深受刘易斯的影响,深受J.刘易斯的影响。
R.
R。
R.
R。
Tolkien, heavily influenced even by Dorothy Sayers and her detective stories, heavily influenced by Chesterton’s Father Brown stories.
托尔金甚至深受多萝西·塞耶斯和她的侦探小说的影响,也深受切斯特顿的布朗神父故事的影响。
I think it’s probably fair to say that Chesterton’s Father Brown stories had as much influence on my worldview as his more sort of polemical and argumentative writings.
我认为可以公平地说,切斯特顿的布朗神父的故事对我的世界观的影响与他更具争议性和辩论性的作品一样大。
And, again, I think therein lies some important insight that I haven’t thought through, but I think you’re correctly gesturing at, about a particular way of thinking about God and theology that isn’t unique to Christianity, but that is strongly suggested by just the structure of the revelation that we have.
再说一次,我认为其中有一些我没有思考过的重要见解,但我认为你正确地指出了一种思考上帝和神学的特定方式,这种方式不是基督教独有的,但我们所拥有的启示的结构强烈暗示了这一点。
Marilynne Robinson has a line, I think in Gilead, about — one of the characters is imagining that this life is like the epic of heaven.
玛丽莲·罗宾逊(Marilynne Robinson)有一句台词,我想是在《基列》(Gilead),讲述的是“其中一个角色想象着这一生就像天堂的史诗”。
That we’re living in the Iliad or the Odyssey of heaven.
我们生活在《伊利亚特》或《天堂奥德赛》中。
This is the story that will be told in the streets.
这就是街头巷尾流传的故事。
And I think that’s a very powerful and resonant and interesting way of thinking about our lives, but thinking about the Christian view of history that we’re living inside a very, very interesting story that people will be talking about in heaven for a long time.
我认为这是思考我们生活的一种非常有力、引起共鸣和有趣的方式,但想想基督教的历史观,我们生活在一个非常非常有趣的故事中,人们将在天堂谈论很长一段时间。
On tension between Eurocentrism and Catholicism
论欧洲中心主义与天主教之间的紧张关系
Now you’ve been very critical of Angela Merkel’s decision to take in so many Syrian refugees into Germany, the heart of Europe.
现在,您对安格拉·默克尔(Angela Merkel)接纳如此多叙利亚难民进入欧洲中心德国的决定非常批评。
And of course many of those refugees are Muslims.
当然,这些难民中有许多是穆斯林。
So when I read some of what you write, I sense a kind of tension between Catholicism, which is universal in some important ways, but also a kind of Eurocentrism and a fear that the longstanding historical connection between Catholicism, Christianity, and Europe will be broken by migration patterns, by changes in the European Union.
因此,当我读到你写的一些文章时,我感觉到天主教之间存在着一种紧张关系,这种紧张关系在某些重要方面是普遍存在的,但同时也是一种欧洲中心主义和一种担心,即天主教、基督教和欧洲之间长期的历史联系将被移民模式和欧盟的变化所打破。
So, at the margin, how much tension do you see between a kind of Eurocentrism that’s in most of our thinking in the West, and Catholicism itself?
那么,在边缘,你认为西方大多数思想中存在的一种欧洲中心主义与天主教本身之间有多大的紧张关系?
There’s some substantial tension, I think.
我认为存在很大的压力。
I think that the situation in Europe is a very challenging one for anyone to think through, but particularly for a Catholic, because you have this sort of — it’s the ancestral homeland of my faith.
我认为欧洲的情况对于任何人来说都是一个非常具有挑战性的问题,特别是对于天主教徒来说,因为你有这样的“——它是我信仰的祖先故乡”。
And we’re talking about stories: the story of Catholicism is a European story for much of its history.
我们谈论的是故事:天主教的故事在其大部分历史中都是欧洲的故事。
Much of the great dramas, the great debates, and so on take place in that continent.
许多伟大的戏剧、伟大的辩论等等都发生在那个大陆。
And when I sort of think .
当我想的时候。
.
。
.
。
When I think of figures that I identify with, when I think of sort of the writers and artists and so on that I relate to, they are primarily European just because of that synchronicity.
当我想到我所认同的人物时,当我想到与我相关的作家和艺术家等时,他们主要是欧洲人,因为这种同步性。
Because the faith is Europe, and Europe is the faith, historically.
因为信仰就是欧洲,从历史上看,欧洲就是信仰。
But now we’re in an era when that’s not really true.
但现在我们正处在一个事实并非如此的时代。
Europe is sort of a museum of Catholicism in this weird way.
欧洲以这种奇怪的方式有点像天主教博物馆。
With some exceptions, but particularly in Western Europe, it’s a museum.
除了一些例外,尤其是在西欧,它是一座博物馆。
And the culture of Europe is in certain ways hostile and becoming increasingly hostile to traditional religious faith.
欧洲文化在某些方面对传统宗教信仰充满敌意,而且越来越敌对。
And at the same time, you have this sort of alternative of Islam whose potential power and potential ability to reshape Europe is sort of ambiguous.
与此同时,伊斯兰教的另一种选择,其潜在力量和重塑欧洲的潜在能力有点模糊。
It’s not at all clear to me how powerful or how substantial that influence would be.
我根本不清楚这种影响力有多大或有多大。
And so the Catholic is sort of given, at least at the moment, this sort of strange choice.
因此,至少在目前,天主教徒被赋予了这种奇怪的选择。
Would you rather have this museum of your faith be preserved in its existing form in a sort of post-Catholic, maybe still residually Catholic situation, or would you have it be changed dramatically by the entrance into Europe of the faith that Catholicism contended with for world mastery for hundreds and thousands of years?
你愿意让你的信仰博物馆以其现有的形式保存在一种后天主教的、也许仍然是天主教的情况下,还是你想让它因天主教数百年来争夺世界统治权的信仰进入欧洲而发生巨大的改变?
That’s a strange choice to be placed to someone, I think.
我认为,对某人来说这是一个奇怪的选择。
And it’s further complicated by the fact that sort of overshadowing that particular tension is the reality that a large share of the potential long-term migration to Europe could be from Catholic and evangelical portions of Africa.
使情况变得更加复杂的是,现实是,潜在的长期移民中很大一部分可能来自非洲的天主教和福音派地区,这一事实掩盖了这种特殊的紧张局势。
It sort of adds a further layer of dilemma.
这在某种程度上又增加了一层困境。
And so my reaction to Merkel’s move — it sits at one remove from that debate.
因此,我对默克尔此举的反应与这场辩论无关。
My reaction to Merkel’s move was very much as sort of a political analyst who thinks to myself, stability is better than chaos.
我对默克尔此举的反应非常像一位政治分析家,他认为,稳定比混乱好。
As flawed as the liberal order is in various ways, I want it to hold up.
尽管自由主义秩序在很多方面都存在缺陷,但我希望它能够持续下去。
Therefore I don’t want leaders to make these big, dramatic moves that I think could have an obviously destabilizing impact.
因此,我不希望领导人采取这些重大的、戏剧性的举措,我认为这些举措可能会产生明显的不稳定影响。
So I’ve been skeptical for a long time of the sort of extreme sort of Mark Steyn or beyond–Mark Steyn analysis that Europe is inevitably going to go Muslim and so on.
因此,很长一段时间以来,我一直对马克·斯坦恩或其他马克·斯坦恩的极端分析持怀疑态度,即欧洲将不可避免地走向穆斯林化等等。
But having Merkel make a decision like she did sort of pushes me slightly in a Steynian direction, probably.
但让默克尔做出像她那样的决定,可能有点把我推向了斯泰尼亚的方向。
It makes me think Europe’s elites are not reckoning with how big, how fast demographic transformations can change societies, divide societies, create space for all kinds of extremisms to flourish.
这让我觉得欧洲的精英们并没有考虑到人口结构的转变能够以多大、多快的速度改变社会、分裂社会,为各种极端主义的蓬勃发展创造空间。
That’s sort of my columnist’s pundit answer.
这就是我的专栏作家的专家回答。
But I don’t know exactly how to connect it to this deeper question of what kind of future of Europe, given the available options, should a Catholic desire.
但我不知道如何将其与这个更深层次的问题联系起来:考虑到现有的选择,天主教徒应该渴望什么样的欧洲未来。
Because to some extent, if you’re asking me would I rather Europe be atheistic and sort of effectively anti-Catholic for the next 1,000 years, or rather have it be Muslim — perhaps I’d rather have it be Muslim, right?
因为在某种程度上,如果你问我,我是否愿意欧洲在未来 1000 年里成为无神论者并有效地反天主教,或者更愿意让它成为穆斯林——也许我宁愿它成为穆斯林,对吗?
From a Catholic perspective, a sincere Islamic faith is preferable to a truly post-Catholic landscape.
从天主教的角度来看,真诚的伊斯兰信仰比真正的后天主教景观更可取。
But at the same time, we’re not being fully presented with that choice, either.
但与此同时,我们也没有完全面临这样的选择。
So, anyway, I’m just suggesting various uncertainties, I guess.
所以,无论如何,我想我只是提出各种不确定性。
Your forthcoming book is an estimate that perhaps by 2040 there will be 460 million African Catholics, twice as many as in Europe.
您即将出版的书中估计,到 2040 年,非洲天主教徒人数可能会达到 4.6 亿,是欧洲的两倍。
Arguably they go to mass much more often.
可以说,他们去弥撒的次数要多得多。
So if you imagine a future Catholicism where the letter of James is more central to the Bible, there’s more exorcism, more fasting, holy water is more important, there’s a more magical view of the Eucharist, arguably a kind of supernaturalism is more primary, would your reaction just be, “Well, my loyalty is to the church, so I’m just going to go with that flow,” or do you feel there’s some more Eurocentric view of Catholicism that’s being lost in a way we would want to fight for?
因此,如果你想象未来的天主教,其中雅各书对圣经来说更加重要,有更多的驱魔,更多的禁食,圣水更重要,对圣体圣事有更神奇的看法,可以说,一种超自然主义更为主要,你的反应会是,“好吧,我忠诚于教会,所以我就顺其自然”,或者你是否觉得有一些更以欧洲为中心的天主教观点正在消失。我们想要为之奋斗的方式?
Both.
两个都。
I would think that the future of an African Catholicism, of a sort of Africanized Catholicism, is better than many, many futures that I can imagine, but I would still be sorrowful if particularly European distinctives within the church are lost in that transformation.
我认为非洲天主教的未来,一种非洲化的天主教的未来,比我能想象的许多许多未来要好,但如果教会内特别是欧洲的特色在这种转变中消失,我仍然会感到悲伤。
I think if I were playing the optimist, I would say that there is a Euro-African future for the church where African forces, African migration, African ideas, African leaders help renew and enrich and return European Catholics to their faith.
我想,如果我是乐观主义者,我会说教会有一个欧洲-非洲的未来,非洲力量、非洲移民、非洲思想、非洲领导人帮助欧洲天主教徒更新、丰富和回归他们的信仰。
And you can find small, strange examples of this.
你可以找到一些小的、奇怪的例子。
Like Robert Sarah, who is this Guinean cardinal who is seen as a partial antagonist to Pope Francis in certain intra-Catholic debates.
就像几内亚红衣主教罗伯特·萨拉(Robert Sarah)一样,他在某些天主教内部的辩论中被视为教皇方济各的部分反对者。
He went to the Vendée in France for the anniversary of the Vendée and gave a speech there hailing the resistance of Catholics to the revolutionary regime in France in the 18th century, which is kind of this extraordinary moment, not anything you would have imagined 150 years or 200 years ago.
他前往法国旺代省参加旺代省周年纪念活动,并发表演讲,赞扬天主教徒对 18 世纪法国革命政权的抵抗,这是一个非同寻常的时刻,不是你在 150 年前或 200 年前想象到的。
And a kind of moment that, yeah, lets you briefly imagine that kind of — that there could be a Catholicism that revived certain European elements in the process of becoming more African.
是的,在某个时刻,你可以简单地想象一下,在变得更加非洲化的过程中,可能存在一种天主教,它复兴了某些欧洲元素。
But that’s a very, from a Catholic perspective, optimistic view, and the likelihood is that things will be more chaotic and messier and so on.
但从天主教的角度来看,这是一个非常乐观的观点,而且事情很可能会变得更加混乱和混乱等等。
But ultimately my first loyalty is or tries to be to the church rather than to European culture, so I would certainly take an African Catholicism over the museum that we have in Europe today.
但最终我的首要忠诚是或试图忠诚于教会,而不是欧洲文化,所以我肯定会选择非洲天主教而不是我们今天在欧洲拥有的博物馆。
On the merits of Islam
论伊斯兰教的优点
When you see how much behavior Islam or some forms of Islam motivate, do you envy it?
当您看到伊斯兰教或某些形式的伊斯兰教激发了多少行为时,您会羡慕吗?
Do you think, “Well, gee, what is it that they have that we don’t?
你是否会想:“哎呀,有什么是他们有而我们没有的呢?
What do we need to learn from them?” What’s your gut emotional reaction?
我们需要向他们学习什么?”你的本能情绪反应是什么?
I think that Western civilization is decadent, and that decadence has virtues — among them, the absence of the kind of massive bloody civil wars currently roiling the Middle East.
我认为西方文明是颓废的,而这种颓废也有其优点——其中就没有出现目前中东地区那种大规模的血腥内战。
But, at the same time, there is a sense in which, yeah, there are parts of Islam that are closer to asking the most important questions about existence than a lot of people are in the West.
但与此同时,从某种意义上说,是的,伊斯兰教的某些部分比西方的许多人更接近于提出关于存在的最重要的问题。
And asking important questions carries major risks and incites levels of extremism that we’ve tamped down and put away, but that desire for the extreme and the absolute and the truth about things that animates some of the best and some of the worst parts of Islam, I think it’s better for human beings to have that desire than not.
提出重要问题会带来重大风险,并会煽动极端主义,而我们已经压制和消除了这些极端主义,但对极端、绝对和事物真相的渴望激发了伊斯兰教的一些最好和一些最坏的部分,我认为人类拥有这种渴望比没有更好。
There was once a long blog post you wrote really in response to me —
你曾经写过一篇很长的博文,实际上是为了回应我——
Yes.
是的。
COWEN: — and in that, subject to various conditions too complicated to explain (but I’ll mention them so you’re not misquoted), you at least mentioned the possibility of a 10 percent chance that there’s some truth to a synthesis of Judaic, Christian, and Muslim ideas.
COWEN: — 在这一点上,受制于各种过于复杂而无法解释的条件(但我会提到它们,这样你就不会被错误引用),你至少提到了犹太教、基督教和穆斯林思想的综合有一定真理的可能性,有 10% 的可能性。
In that synthesis, highly conditional within your discourse, what’s the element from Islam that appeals to you?
在你的话语中高度有条件的综合中,伊斯兰教中吸引你的元素是什么?
That’s a good question.
这是一个好问题。
I think for the synthesis, I guess when I think about the synthesis in that case, I gave it quite a low probability because it seems to me that Judaism and Christianity make — and, again, this comes back to the storytelling issue maybe — but I think there’s a more organic and obvious unity in that story than there is in the combined story.
我认为对于综合,我想当我考虑这种情况下的综合时,我给了它相当低的概率,因为在我看来,犹太教和基督教使得“并且,这又回到了讲故事的问题”,但我认为这个故事比组合故事有更有机和明显的统一。
So I think for the .
所以我认为对于.
.
。
.
。
I don’t think I have a certain answer; I can tell you things — as I just, I suppose, started to — that I admire within the Muslim world.
我认为我没有确定的答案;我可以告诉你一些我在穆斯林世界中钦佩的事情——我想我刚刚开始这么做。
But I can’t tell you definitely, and this is I guess why I am a Christian and not a Muslim.
但我不能明确地告诉你,这就是我猜我是基督徒而不是穆斯林的原因。
I can’t tell you what I think — how I think that story would fit together.
我无法告诉你我的想法——我认为这个故事如何组合在一起。
If God’s revelation to Muhammad were as definitive a revelation as the revelations of Christianity and Judaism, I can’t make that story work; so the story then has to be bigger.
如果上帝对穆罕默德的启示与基督教和犹太教的启示一样明确,我就无法让这个故事成立;所以故事必须更大。
I guess that for there to be a Judeo-Christian-Islamic synthesis, then it does await some further revelation that would make more sense of the Islamic story to me.
我想,要实现犹太教、基督教、伊斯兰教的综合,就需要等待一些进一步的启示,让我对伊斯兰教的故事有更多的理解。
On Opus Dei
论主业团
As you know I come at all of this as very much an outsider, so let me ask a very naive question.
如你所知,我作为一个局外人来看待这一切,所以让我问一个非常天真的问题。
If I look at the Catholic Church, there’s a movement, as you know, called Opus Dei.
如果我看看天主教堂,有一个运动,如你所知,称为主业会(Opus Dei)。
The priests of that movement, they seem to be less caught up in sex scandals.
作为该运动的牧师,他们似乎较少陷入性丑闻。
Parts of the movement seem to have some understanding of what you might broadly call conservative economics.
该运动的部分成员似乎对所谓的保守经济学有一定的了解。
In Spanish politics in the ’30s, ’40s, and ’50s they were actually considered a liberalizing force, so they don’t have to be seen as reactionary per se.
在20世纪30年代、40年代和50年代的西班牙政治中,他们实际上被认为是自由化力量,因此他们本身不必被视为反动势力。
Why aren’t they simply the good guys?
为什么他们不只是好人呢?
They don’t come up much in your writings.
它们在你的著作中并没有太多出现。
I’m reading you and I think, “Where’s Opus Dei?”
当我读到你的文章时,我想:“主业团在哪里?”
I mean, I’m pro–Opus Dei overall.
我的意思是,我总体上是支持主业会的。
I think that my only .
我认为这是我唯一的。
.
。
.
。
It seems to me sometimes that Opus Dei is a particular apostolate, right, and the particular idea of Opus Dei is that it’s not primarily supposed to be a priestly order, even though there are of course priests of Opus Dei.
有时在我看来,主业会是一个特殊的使徒机构,对吧,主业会的特殊想法是,它主要不应该是一个神父组织,尽管主业会当然有神父。
The central idea, and with apologies to Opus Dei members if I’m getting this at all wrong, but the central idea is that it’s a ministry.
中心思想,如果我完全理解错了,请向主业团成员道歉,但中心思想是这是一个事工。
It’s an apostolate for laypeople who are at work in the business world, the journalism world, the corporate world, the communications world, and so on.
它是为商业界、新闻界、企业界、传播界等工作的外行人士的使徒。
And as such, I think it has an admirable and important vocation in the life of the world and the life of the church.
因此,我认为它在世界生活和教会生活中具有令人钦佩和重要的使命。
But it seems to me in part that there is a sort of .
但在我看来,部分地存在着某种。
.
。
.
。
There’s a kind of, not set-apartness exactly, but there’s an element of .
有一种,不完全是分开的,但有一个元素。
.
。
.
。
Well, I think a big part of the crisis in Catholicism in the last 60 or 70 years can simply be distilled to a collapse in the sense of the importance of religious life, of consecrated life, of the priesthood, religious orders, sisters and brothers, and so on.
嗯,我认为过去 60 或 70 年天主教危机的很大一部分可以简单地归结为宗教生活、奉献生活、神职人员、宗教团体、兄弟姐妹等重要性的崩溃。
And it’s as easy for me to say because I did not become a priest and so it’s always easier once you haven’t become a priest to say, “Oh, well, you need more people to become priests.” But to the extent that that’s true, Opus Dei seems like it’s very well tailored in certain ways to secular society as it exists right now.
对我来说这很容易说,因为我没有成为牧师,所以一旦你还没有成为牧师,说“哦,好吧,你需要更多的人成为牧师”总是更容易。但就这一点而言,主业团似乎在某些方面非常适合目前存在的世俗社会。
But I think the ultimate revival of the church is likely to come from a slightly more radical view of the proper relation to the world — that essentially what the church needs now is the equivalent of the Franciscans, the Dominicans, the Jesuits, these kind of orders from previous eras that are sort of .
但我认为教会的最终复兴很可能来自于对与世界的正确关系的稍微更激进的观点——教会现在需要的基本上是方济各会、多明我会、耶稣会,这些来自以前时代的命令,有点……。
.
。
.
。
I mean, Opus Dei asks laypeople to take vows of various kinds; celibate laypeople are part of the Opus Dei structure.
我的意思是,主业会要求平信徒发各种誓言;独身平信徒是主业团结构的一部分。
And I think that there is .
我认为是有的。
.
。
.
。
Essentially, there is just a straightforward need for a more old-fashioned model of just priests and nuns.
从本质上讲,只是直接需要一种由牧师和修女组成的更老式的模式。
The church needs more priests and nuns.
教会需要更多的神父和修女。
Catholicism can’t function without priests and nuns, which doesn’t take anything away from what Opus Dei is doing and, of course, they have many vocations and many priests.
没有神父和修女,天主教就无法运作,这并没有影响主业团正在做的事情,当然,他们有很多圣召和神父。
But yeah, to the extent that it doesn’t get the due maybe that it deserves in my writings, that’s probably, maybe, the root of it.
但是,是的,如果它在我的著作中没有得到应有的重视,这可能就是它的根源。
Again, you’re teasing out things I haven’t even begun to think about before, which is .
再说一次,你在梳理我以前从未开始思考过的事情,那就是。
.
。
.
。
There’s no particular reason why.
没有什么特别的原因。
The sacramental life of the church depends on a strong priesthood, depends on men becoming priests; it depends on religious orders and so on.
教会的圣礼生活有赖于强大的祭司职任,有赖于男人成为祭司;这取决于宗教秩序等等。
And so full revival in the church would need a priestly center to it, in a way, and not just a focus on sort of apostolates and evangelization within the world.
因此,教会的全面复兴在某种程度上需要一个祭司中心,而不仅仅是关注世界范围内的使徒和福传。
Catholicism has been caught up in the idea that this is the Age of the Laity for the last 50 or 60 years.
过去 50 或 60 年来,天主教一直坚信这是平信徒时代。
I think the Age of the Laity has kind of been a disaster for the church in certain ways.
我认为平信徒时代在某些方面对教会来说是一场灾难。
On conservatism with religion
论保守主义与宗教
Here’s a question from a reader, and I’m stringing together a few different sentences — something like, “Is conservatism always particularist and local?
这是一位读者提出的问题,我将几个不同的句子串在一起 - 之类的东西,“保守主义总是特殊主义和地方性的吗?
Can there ever be a universalist conservative position?
是否存在普遍主义的保守立场?
Is the phrase ‘Christian conservative’ an oxymoron, because Christianity (like Islam) is a universalist faith that seeks to convert every soul on earth?
“基督教保守派”这个词是不是一个矛盾修饰法,因为基督教(像伊斯兰教一样)是一种普世主义信仰,旨在改变地球上每个灵魂的信仰?
Isn’t the word ‘conservative’ better suited for more aloof, inegalitarian, less-aggressive religions, such as Hinduism, which are less insistent on ‘natural right’?”
‘保守’这个词不是更适合那些冷漠、不平等、不那么咄咄逼人的宗教,比如印度教,它们不太坚持‘自然权利’吗?”
How would you respond to that?
你对此有何反应?
I think conservatism is particularist, sort of by the definition, yes.
我认为保守主义是特殊主义,从定义上来说,是的。
And I think that every form of conservatism is going to be different depending on the cultural context.
我认为每种形式的保守主义都会因文化背景而有所不同。
I think conservatism in America at its best is trying to preserve a kind of American exceptionalism that doesn’t sort of have applications really when you’re thinking about what a German conservatism would be, or a Russian conservatism, and so on.
我认为美国的保守主义最好的做法是试图保留一种美国例外论,当你思考德国保守主义或俄罗斯保守主义等等时,这种例外论并没有真正的应用。
And, in that sense, Christianity can only be conservative in sort of provisional and context-bound ways, right?
而且,从这个意义上说,基督教只能以某种临时的、受环境限制的方式保守,对吗?
In a culture that was universally Christian and is in the process of ceasing to be so, then Christianity — then the phrase “conservative Christian” makes a lot of sense, in the sense that you have a universal faith that has taken over a particular piece of the world, and you’re trying to sort of preserve its influence and power over that piece.
在一个普遍基督教并且正在不再是基督教的文化中,那么基督教 ——那么“保守基督教”这个词就很有意义,因为你有一个普遍的信仰,它已经接管了世界的某个特定部分,并且你试图在某种程度上保留它对该部分的影响和权力。
But that’s always contingent and temporary.
但这总是偶然的和暂时的。
And, yes, Christianity is at its root a more radical religion.
是的,基督教从根本上来说是一种更为激进的宗教。
On Watership Down
沃特希普号沉没时
Now we have two porcelain bunnies here on the table with us, and those are to refer to a novel, Watership Down, that you once called “the best modern novel about politics.” Why is this the case?
现在我们桌上有两只瓷兔子,它们指的是一本小说《沃特希普镇》,您曾经称之为“最好的现代政治小说”。为什么会这样呢?
That was maybe an overstatement —
这也许是夸大其词了——
— but I think Watership Down .
— 但我认为《沃特希普坠落》。
.
。
.
。
We live in an age of intense attention paid to children’s books and young adults books by people who are adults, and there’s a lot of reasonable controversy over whether that’s a good thing necessarily, but I’ve been always disappointed that there hasn’t been a kind of sustained Watership Down revival because it’s such a great book and it’s a book about — essentially, it’s about a founding.
我们生活在一个成年人对儿童读物和青少年读物给予强烈关注的时代,对于这是否一定是一件好事,存在着很多合理的争议,但我一直很失望的是,《沃特希普镇》没有出现持续的复兴,因为它是一本如此伟大的书,而且它是一本关于——本质上,它是关于一个创立的书。
It’s connected, in a sense, to the kind of things that the Straussians are always arguing about and so on.
从某种意义上说,它与施特劳斯派总是争论的事情有关等等。
What does the founding mean, and so on?
成立意味着什么等等?
But you have a group of rabbits who go forth and encounter different models of political order, different ways of relating to humankind, that shadow over rabbit-kind at any point.
但是,有一群兔子,他们前进并遇到不同的政治秩序模式,与人类相处的不同方式,这些阴影在任何时候都笼罩在兔子身上。
You have a warren that has essentially surrendered itself to humanity and exists as a kind of breeding farm, and you have a warren that’s run as a fascist dictatorship essentially.
你有一个基本上屈服于人类并作为一种养殖场存在的沃伦,并且你有一个本质上作为法西斯独裁统治的沃伦。
And then you have this attempt to form a political community that is somewhere in between the two, getting back to the Hegelian synthesis and so on.
然后你试图形成一个介于两者之间的政治共同体,回到黑格尔的综合等等。
And you have sort of this primal narrative where the problem is of course that they don’t have any females, and so there’s this competition, this competition for reproductive power that’s carried out between these different warrens where the rabbits from the good warren have to literally — not kidnap, because the does come willingly — but steal women from the fascist dictatorship, which maintains a ruthless control over reproduction.
你有这样一种原始的叙述,问题当然是它们没有任何雌性,所以存在着这种竞争,这种在这些不同的饲养场之间进行的繁殖力竞争,来自好饲养场的兔子必须真正地“不是绑架,因为它们确实是自愿的”而是从法西斯独裁政权中偷走女性,法西斯独裁政权对繁殖保持着无情的控制。
So there’s just a lot of fascinating stuff there, and then it’s all interspersed with storytelling.
所以那里有很多令人着迷的东西,然后都穿插着讲故事。
There’s the sort of rabbit folktales that Richard —
有一种兔子的民间故事,理查德——
So, narrative again.
于是,再次叙述。
Narrative again.
又叙述一下。
— that Richard Adams came up with, that are just brilliant, about El-ahrairah, the great rabbit folk hero, and his relationship.
——理查德·亚当斯(Richard Adams)提出的关于伟大的兔子民间英雄 El-ahrairah 和他的关系的非常棒。
There is actually the rudiments of a rabbit theology in Watership Down.
实际上,《沃特希普镇》中已经有了兔子神学的雏形。
What kind of theology is it?
它是什么样的神学?
How would rabbits think about God?
兔子会如何看待上帝?
How would rabbits think about their proper relationship to God?
兔子会如何思考他们与上帝的正确关系?
What kind of myths would they develop to explain their position in the world as opposed to every other creature?
他们会发展什么样的神话来解释他们在世界上相对于其他生物的地位?
And it’s all quite brilliant.
这一切都非常精彩。
It’s a great novel.
这是一本很棒的小说。
In fact, I reread it last year, and it was still quite great.
其实去年我又重读了一遍,还是很棒的。
And then there’s even, right, there’s even a mystical element.
甚至,对,甚至还有神秘的元素。
The book begins with this rabbit Fiver, who is sort of a runt, who has visions — and the whole founding is based on various prophecies and visions that he has throughout the beginnings of this rabbit warren, that these rabbits go out and found.
这本书以这只兔子菲弗开始,他有点矮,有愿景——整个建立是基于他在这个兔子窝的开始阶段所拥有的各种预言和愿景,这些兔子出去发现了这些。
So he has a vision of apocalypse, so there’s an Aeneid element, clearly, where — probably he uses quotes from the Aeneid; he has quotes before every chapter — where the city falls and you have to go found a new city and there’s religious visions along the way that relate to the legitimacy of the founding.
所以他有一个世界末日的愿景,所以显然有一个埃涅阿斯纪元素,其中 - 可能他引用了《埃涅阿斯纪》中的引述;他在每一章之前都有引言——“城市陷落的地方,你必须去寻找一座新城市,沿途有与建立的合法性相关的宗教愿景。”
And there’s a tension between .
并且之间存在紧张关系。
.
。
.
。
Sorry, I’m rambling, but you got me going here.
抱歉,我有点胡言乱语,但你让我走到这里。
There’s this great tension between Hazel and Bigwig, who are the two leaders of the city that’s being founded, and Bigwig is — he was a member of the Owsla, which is the rabbit martial order.
海泽尔和比格维格这两个正在建立的城市的领导人之间存在着巨大的紧张关系,而比格维格是“Owsla”的成员,这是兔子军事组织。
And everyone assumes when they meet this group of rabbits that he is the leader, but in fact the leader is Hazel, who is this rabbit who is neither the visionary nor the military leader, but just — he’s the politician, and he’s good at it, and the success of the warren is based on ultimately the subordination of Bigwig, and the martial, and the religious to the politicians.
当每个人遇到这群兔子时,每个人都认为他是领导者,但事实上,领导者是黑兹尔,他就是这只兔子,他既不是有远见的人,也不是军事领袖,而只是——他是政治家,而且他很擅长,而沃伦的成功最终是基于大佬、军事和宗教对政治家的从属。
So the next time you have Peter Thiel here for one of these conversations, you can really press him on if there’s a Girardian element in Watership Down.
因此,下次当你邀请彼得·泰尔来进行此类对话时,如果《沃特希普坠落》中有吉拉德元素,你真的可以向他施加压力。
There’s a lot further to go with this, but I’ve probably gone far enough.
这方面还有很多工作要做,但我可能已经走得足够远了。
The next time you have Peter Thiel here for one of these conversations, you can really press him on if there’s a Girardian element in Watership Down.
下次当你邀请彼得·泰尔来进行此类对话时,如果《沃特希普镇》中有吉拉德元素,你真的可以向他施加压力。
On cats
关于猫
Your wife, Abigail Tucker, has published a famous book about cats.
你的妻子阿比盖尔·塔克出版了一本关于猫的著名书籍。
What’s the biggest disagreement you have with her about cats?
关于猫,你和她最大的分歧是什么?
Well, I need to be a little careful here, because .
好吧,我在这里需要小心一点,因为。
.
。
.
。
Abby, when we met and got married, loved cats; and I always sort of admired cats from a —
当我们认识并结婚时,艾比喜欢猫;我一直很欣赏猫——
I was a cat person who admired their singular standoffishness, and so on.
我是一个喜欢猫的人,很欣赏它们独特的冷漠态度,等等。
I think in certain ways writing the book about cats brought her around to something closer to my view.
我认为在某些方面,写这本关于猫的书让她更接近我的观点。
She started the book shortly after we started having children and one of the interesting things that she realized was how much of her reaction to cats was a displaced child reaction; that cats have these faces that look like infants’ faces and have the eyes and the wide faces, and they meow in this way that approximates an infant’s cry, and they essentially hijack the maternal instinct.
我们开始生孩子后不久,她就开始写这本书,她意识到一件有趣的事情是,她对猫的反应有多少是流离失所的孩子的反应;猫的脸看起来像婴儿的脸,有眼睛和宽阔的脸,它们的喵叫方式类似于婴儿的哭声,它们本质上劫持了母性本能。
So she had sort of maternal feelings towards cats, but in the process of having actual children and writing the book, I think she came to an appreciation of them more as these fascinating apex predators.
所以她对猫有一种母性的感情,但在生下真正的孩子和写这本书的过程中,我认为她更多地欣赏它们,因为这些迷人的顶级掠食者。
That’s sort the theme of the book, which you should all read.
这就是这本书的主题,你们都应该读一读。
It’s much more interesting than late 20th-century Catholic theology.
它比 20 世纪末的天主教神学有趣得多。
But the theme of the book is this idea that this sort of cuddly fur-baby in your room is an apex predator who has taken over the world through its relationship to human beings.
但这本书的主题是这样的想法:你房间里的这种可爱的毛皮婴儿是顶级掠食者,通过与人类的关系占领了世界。
And I think that was my view all along.
我认为这一直是我的观点。
So really we’ve sort of smoothed out our fundamental disagreement by the process of having her learn more about cats than anyone could ever possibly imagine knowing.
所以,通过让她对猫的了解比任何人想象的都要多,我们实际上已经消除了我们之间的根本分歧。
On things under- and overrated
关于被低估和高估的事情
As you may know, we often in the middle have the segment “Overrated versus Underrated” —
正如你可能知道的,我们经常在中间有“高估与低估”的部分——
Been dreading it, yes.
一直害怕它,是的。
— and, of course, feel free to pass.
——当然,请随意通过。
Let’s start with the TV show The Sopranos.
让我们从电视节目《黑道家族》开始。
Overrated or underrated?
被高估还是被低估?
Very slightly underrated.
被严重低估了。
Why?
为什么?
I think that the proliferation of Sopranos imitators and the desire of certain people to .
我认为黑道家族模仿者的泛滥和某些人的愿望。
.
。
.
。
There are a lot of people who wanted to like The Wire more than The Sopranos because The Wire was sort of sociological and political in a way that Sopranos wasn’t.
有很多人更喜欢《火线》而不是《黑道家族》,因为《火线》在某种程度上具有社会学和政治性,而《黑道家族》则不然。
And so there was a certain number of people who should have known better who convinced themselves that The Wire was a better show than The Sopranos, which it is not —
因此,有一定数量的人本应更了解他们,他们说服自己《火线》比《黑道家族》更好,但事实并非如此——
But Sopranos is more theological, right?
但《黑道家族》更具有神学意义,对吗?
The Sopranos is more .
黑道家族更多。
.
。
.
。
Yes.
是的。
And it’s more personal and psychological.
而且它更个人化和心理化。
I mean it is .
我的意思是它是。
.
。
.
。
The characters on The Wire are fascinating, but they are .
《火线》中的角色很迷人,但他们确实是。
.
。
.
。
When you meet them you know who they are.
当你见到他们时,你就知道他们是谁。
It is Dickensian in that sense; the sort of endless jokes about the Dickensian element on The Wire are right.
从这个意义上来说,它是狄更斯式的。 《火线》中关于狄更斯元素的那种没完没了的笑话是正确的。
And Dickens is a great novelist and The Wire is a great show, but there’s a depth to much of The Sopranos that I think is not equaled by The Wire and hasn’t quite been equaled in any show since.
狄更斯是一位伟大的小说家,《火线》是一部很棒的剧,但《黑道家族》的大部分深度我认为是《火线》无法比拟的,而且此后的任何剧都无法与之相比。
So —
所以——
But only very — people love The Wire, so it can only be very slightly underrated — I mean people love The Sopranos.
但只有非常 —— 人们喜欢《火线》,所以它只能被略微低估 —— 我的意思是人们喜欢《黑道家族》。
The Wire is a great show, but there’s a depth to much of The Sopranos that I think is not equaled by The Wire and hasn’t quite been equaled in any show since.
《火线》是一部很棒的剧,但《黑道家族》的很多深度我认为是《火线》无法比拟的,而且此后的任何剧都无法与之媲美。
Evelyn Waugh — Brideshead Revisited, a novel.
伊芙琳·沃(Evelyn Waugh)——《故园重游》,一部小说。
Overrated.
被高估了。
Why?
为什么?
There is a little too much sentimentality in the Catholicism.
天主教里有点太多感伤了。
And the Sword of Honor Trilogy is a little more cold-eyed and therefore slightly better.
而荣耀之剑三部曲则更加冷眼一些,因此也稍微好一些。
A side question: If you think about a lot of the Catholic authors — Walker Percy, Graham Greene, Flannery O’Connor, Gene Wolfe, Louise Erdrich — do you feel as a whole Catholicism is sufficiently well represented in literature, or in a sense are you a bit let down by the aggregate weight of the better-known Catholic novels?
附带问题:如果你想到许多天主教作家——沃克·珀西、格雷厄姆·格林、弗兰纳里·奥康纳、吉恩·沃尔夫、路易丝·厄德里克——你是否觉得整个天主教在文学中得到了充分的体现,或者在某种意义上,你是否对更知名的天主教小说的总重量感到有点失望?
No. I think it’s well represented, and I think that the decline in Catholicism’s importance in literature since that Waugh-Greene golden age has happened in parallel with the decline of literature’s cultural importance in certain ways.
不。我认为这得到了很好的体现,而且我认为自沃格林黄金时代以来,天主教在文学中的重要性的下降与文学在某些方面的文化重要性的下降是同时发生的。
Some of it depends on whether you claim Shakespeare for the Catholics or not, which is a —
其中一些取决于你是否为天主教徒声称莎士比亚,这是一个——
Do you?
你呢?
— a lively .
—— 热闹。
.
。
.
。
It’s been a while since I .
我已经有一段时间了。
.
。
.
。
You want to, right?
你想要,对吗?
You want to.
你想要。
It’s been a while — I want to, yeah.
已经有一段时间了 —— 我想要,是的。
It’s been a while since I really dug into that debate, but I’d like to.
我已经有一段时间没有真正深入研究这场辩论了,但我愿意。
And I think that actually does, in a weird way, tip things in certain ways when you’re talking about the scale of things.
我认为,当你谈论事物的规模时,这确实以一种奇怪的方式以某种方式提示事物。
But no, the period that produced Waugh and Greene and a lot of those writers is in certain ways one of my favorite periods in modern literature.
但不,产生沃和格林以及许多这样的作家的时期在某些方面是我最喜欢的现代文学时期之一。
And even the writers in that era who are not practicing Catholics seem to me to be influenced in different ways, like Hemingway and Fitzgerald in different ways.
在我看来,即使是那个时代那些不信奉天主教的作家也受到不同方式的影响,比如海明威和菲茨杰拉德以不同的方式受到影响。
For instance, Hemingway is writing in a Catholic cultural context in a lot of his stories and Fitzgerald is, of course, a lapsed Catholic of a certain kind.
例如,海明威在他的许多故事中都是在天主教文化背景下写作的,而菲茨杰拉德当然是某种已经失信的天主教徒。
So I think Catholicism hangs in an interesting way over that whole first-half-of-the-20th-century period of literature.
所以我认为天主教以一种有趣的方式贯穿了整个 20 世纪上半叶的文学时期。
And I think that’s the best recent period of literature, so I’ll claim some chauvinistic pride.
我认为这是最近最好的文学时期,所以我会声称有一些沙文主义的自豪感。
Elgar’s oratorio, Dream of Gerontius?
埃尔加的清唱剧《杰隆修斯之梦》?
Pass.
经过。
What music then best expresses God?
那么什么音乐最能表达上帝呢?
In musical terms, I’m a bit of a philistine.
从音乐的角度来说,我有点庸俗。
I like a lot of .
我喜欢很多。
.
。
.
。
Well, this is — again, you’re going to get me on narrative every time.
好吧,这就是——再次,你每次都会让我开始叙述。
I like a lot of folk, country kind of music.
我喜欢很多民间音乐、乡村音乐。
I don’t know that I would make any special theological claims for it, generally.
一般来说,我不知道我会为此提出任何特殊的神学主张。
But that’s sort of my musical tastes run to .
但这就是我的音乐品味。
.
。
.
。
I don’t even know how to say this without being embarrassing, but like Natalie Merchant, that kind of thing.
我什至不知道如何在不尴尬的情况下说出这句话,但就像娜塔莉·麦昌特那样。
And I haven’t thought through the theological dimension, except I do like some of the stories, the storytelling, in country music.
我还没有思考过神学的维度,除了我确实喜欢乡村音乐中的一些故事、讲故事的方式。
The Andrew Lloyd Webber musical Jesus Christ Superstar.
安德鲁·劳埃德·韦伯的音乐剧《耶稣基督万世巨星》。
It’s been a while, but I’ll say slightly underrated, just for kicks.
已经有一段时间了,但我会说有点被低估了,只是为了好玩。
On Dante’s Inferno, the next Great Awakening, and Sam’s Club Republicans
关于但丁的地狱、下一次大觉醒和山姆俱乐部共和党人
What should we infer from the narrative superiority of Dante’s Inferno within the Divine Comedy — but of course feel free to challenge the premise.
我们应该从《神曲》中但丁的《地狱篇》的叙事优越性中推断出什么——但当然可以随意挑战这个前提。
No, I won’t challenge the premise.
不,我不会挑战这个前提。
I think that there is a sort of sincere limit to human imagination when it comes to contemplating the idea of the beatific vision and so on, and that comes across.
我认为,在思考美好愿景等想法时,人类的想象力存在某种真诚的限制,这一点是显而易见的。
We don’t know how to tell stories about the story outside our story in quite the same way.
我们不知道如何以完全相同的方式讲述我们故事之外的故事。
And the Inferno is telling a story about the world that we’re all familiar with and that’s easier.
《地狱》讲述的是一个我们都熟悉的世界的故事,而且更容易。
Which American demographic will start the next Great Awakening?
哪些美国人口将开始下一次大觉醒?
Most .
最多 。
.
。
.
。
Let’s say Asians, just to be provocative.
就说亚洲人吧,只是为了挑衅。
OK.
好的。
Good answer.
很好的答案。
And if you ask me which Asians, I’ll really, I’ll .
如果你问我是哪些亚洲人,我真的会。
.
。
.
。
No.
不。
In your book with our common friend Reihan Salam, you develop a philosophy sometimes called the Reformicons, and you make the point that Republicans ought to try harder to address what are sometimes called Sam’s Club Republicans — lower-income groups who have been hurting in some ways due to economic trends.
在您与我们共同的朋友雷汉·萨拉姆 (Reihan Salam) 撰写的书中,您提出了一种有时被称为“改革派”的哲学,并指出共和党人应该更加努力地解决有时被称为“山姆俱乐部共和党人”的问题——即因经济趋势而在某些方面受到伤害的低收入群体。
When you look at the last year to year and a half or two years of our politics, does part of you want to turn back and have politics more focused on elites once again, and does any part of you feel that trying to address Sam’s Club Republicans, Democrats, Independents, that there’s a danger there that we hadn’t seen before, or no?
当你回顾我们过去一年半或两年的政治时,你们中的一部分人是否想回头,让政治再次更加关注精英,你们中的一部分人是否觉得试图向山姆会员店的共和党人、民主党人、独立人士讲话,存在我们以前从未见过的危险,或者没有?
No. I think that you can’t escape — in a democratic society, you can’t escape the demos.
不,我认为你无法逃避——在民主社会中,你无法逃避民主。
And so attempts to maintain elite control over politics that don’t address deep, profound, systemic social problems are doomed to eventually produce, excuse me, things like the Trump phenomenon.
因此,试图维持精英对政治的控制,而不解决深刻的、深刻的、系统性的社会问题,注定最终会产生像特朗普现象这样的事情。
And, of course in sort of a narrow, moment-by-moment way during the campaign, if you followed my mostly wrong commentary during Trump’s march to the nomination, I was all for sort of elite energy being expended in that moment to block Trump.
当然,在竞选期间,如果你在特朗普竞选提名期间遵循了我大部分错误的评论,那么我完全赞成在那一刻消耗精英能量来阻止特朗普。
And the point of elites is to prevent manifestly unfit people from becoming president.
精英的目的是防止明显不适合的人成为总统。
But, if there is a larger systemic elite failure, then things like that will happen.
但是,如果出现更大的系统性精英失败,那么类似的事情就会发生。
And so the way to avoid that situation is for elites to focus — again, to care about what’s going on with the demos.
因此,避免这种情况的方法是精英们再次集中注意力,关心演示的进展情况。
With the actual people out in actual America.
与真实的美国人民一起。
And that’s something I don’t think Republicans were very good at before Trump, and I don’t think it’s something they’re particularly good at under Trump.
我认为在特朗普之前共和党人并不擅长这一点,而且我也不认为在特朗普领导下他们特别擅长这一点。
But, I think, had they been better at it, the Trump phenomenon would at least have been different than it was.
但我认为,如果他们做得更好,特朗普现象至少会有所不同。
CRISPR is a new technology that has made significant progress lately.
CRISPR是一项最近取得重大进展的新技术。
Maybe it will never allow us to deliberately engineer the entire human or the entire human baby, but it seems plausible to believe it could lead to some kind of slow genetic drift, in a way that would be in some manner planned or programmed by human beings.
也许它永远不会允许我们故意设计整个人类或整个人类婴儿,但似乎有理由相信它可能会导致某种缓慢的基因漂移,以某种方式由人类计划或编程。
For you, is this a kind of nightmare, or does this possibly have an upside or even a utopian side?
对你来说,这是一场噩梦,还是可能有积极的一面,甚至是乌托邦的一面?
I’m skeptical of its utopian side.
我对其乌托邦的一面持怀疑态度。
I don’t think it has to be a nightmare, but I think that there has to be .
我不认为这一定是一场噩梦,但我认为必须有。
.
。
.
。
I think that there is a deep aversion, particularly in the United States but elsewhere as well, to exercising political control over technologies.
我认为,人们对对技术实施政治控制有着深深的厌恶,尤其是在美国,但在其他地方也是如此。
And I think the challenge of the next 100 to 500 years of human history is getting better at exerting political control over technologies and preventing actual nightmare scenarios.
我认为人类历史未来 100 到 500 年的挑战是更好地对技术施加政治控制并防止真正的噩梦场景发生。
And I feel this in certain ways with computers, the internet, virtual reality, and so on.
我在计算机、互联网、虚拟现实等方面以某种方式感受到了这一点。
I think that we’re — that to me is a more immediate source of anxiety than genetic engineering.
我认为我们——对我来说,这是比基因工程更直接的焦虑来源。
I think that we’re going to wake up in 20 or 30 years and be — well, we may not wake up, but I would like to think that we’ll wake up in 20 or 30 years and say — “Why were we putting all of our children in front of these screens for so much of their childhood and shouldn’t this be something that we had exerted actual control over instead of just leaving it to some combination of experiment and market forces and governments wanting to be hip and cool and buying a lot of Chromebooks that Microsoft wanted to unload,” and so on.
我认为我们会在 20 或 30 年后醒来,然后说:“好吧,我们可能不会醒来,但我想我们会在 20 或 30 年后醒来,然后说:“为什么我们让所有的孩子在童年的大部分时间都在这些屏幕前,这难道不应该是我们实际控制的事情,而不是仅仅把它留给实验、市场力量和政府的某种组合吗?想要变得时尚、酷,购买了很多 Microsoft 想要卸载的 Chromebook,”等等。
And so I could see something similar happening with genetic technology, but I think bringing technology under control so that the more radical genetic experiments are limited and happening in, happening at the margins, basically, that should be the goal.
所以我可以看到类似的事情发生在基因技术上,但我认为将技术置于控制之下,以便更激进的基因实验受到限制并发生在边缘,基本上,这应该是目标。
I think it doesn’t mean that we could actually succeed, but I think it’s a reasonable goal to set.
我认为这并不意味着我们真的可以成功,但我认为这是一个合理的目标设定。
What do you think we’ll see as the main cost 30 years from now from letting our children sit behind screens for so many hours a day?
您认为 30 年后,让我们的孩子每天坐在屏幕后面这么多小时,我们将面临的主要成本是什么?
I think it’s bad for human imagination, for normal relationships, for appreciating reality as it actually exists.
我认为这不利于人类的想象力、正常的人际关系、欣赏现实的真实存在。
I think the reason we may not see costs is that it has a numbing effect in certain ways on human behavior.
我认为我们可能看不到成本的原因是它在某些方面对人类行为产生麻木作用。
That it doesn’t necessarily lead to egregious acting out of the kind that leads to crime waves or political tumult or anything like that.
这并不一定会导致犯罪浪潮或政治骚乱或类似事件那样的恶劣行为。
So the costs — I think the costs are likely to be felt in, as I think they’re already to some extent being felt in, increased mental disturbance on the margins, difficulty forming marriages, families, normal human relationships, and more cultural despair, I think.
因此,成本 ——我认为成本可能会体现在,因为我认为它们已经在某种程度上感受到了,边缘精神障碍的增加,婚姻、家庭、正常人际关系的困难,以及更多的文化绝望,我认为。
As you know, euthanasia is now relatively easy in both the Netherlands and Switzerland.
如您所知,安乐死现在在荷兰和瑞士都相对容易。
What do you feel is the intellectual and/or moral error behind this reality?
您认为这一现实背后的智力和/或道德错误是什么?
And I take it you do view this as an error.
我认为你确实认为这是一个错误。
Yes.
是的。
I do.
我愿意。
I think that it’s, that it is a, it’s an example, I suppose, of — to go back to the very beginning of our conversation — of where this sort of liberal view of rights has so far escaped its Christian origins as to become a vision of self-ownership that I think is not actually true to human existence, true to human experience.
我认为,这是一个,我想,这是一个例子,“回到我们谈话的一开始”,这种自由主义的权利观迄今为止已经脱离了它的基督教起源,而成为一种自我所有权的愿景,我认为这实际上并不符合人类的存在,也不符合人类的经验。
And yeah, I think that the case against suicide is quite similar to the case against murder.
是的,我认为反对自杀的案件与反对谋杀的案件非常相似。
And I think our drift away from recognizing that as a case study in the working out of certain liberal ideas that have gotten far enough from the truth as to just be false.
我认为我们已经偏离了认识到,作为某些自由主义思想的案例研究,这些思想已经与事实相去甚远,以至于完全是错误的。
On being open to weird ideas
对奇怪的想法持开放态度
Religion aside, learning to tie your shoelaces aside, what did you learn from your mother?
抛开宗教,学会系鞋带,你从你母亲那里学到了什么?
I suppose I learned .
我想我学会了。
.
。
.
。
This folds in religion, so I apologize; it’s cheating a little bit.
这与宗教有关,所以我道歉;这有点作弊。
But we spent a lot of time .
但我们花了很多时间。
.
。
.
。
My mother had health issues when I was young, and we ended up as religious as we were in part because of healing services that she went to because she was ill or because she had friends who recommended them.
我年轻时,我母亲有健康问题,我们最终变得虔诚,部分原因是她因为生病而去接受治疗服务,或者因为她有朋友推荐这些服务。
But there was a wider orbit to that where we ate health food long before health food was cool.
但还有一个更广泛的轨道,即我们在健康食品流行之前很久就开始吃健康食品了。
We ate tofu, and you could only get tofu by going to the back of a weird health-food store, and it would be in these vats of water, and you’d pick up these huge blocks of tofu with tongs, like people pulling icebergs out of 19th century ponds in Vermont.
我们吃豆腐,你只能去一家奇怪的保健食品店后面才能买到豆腐,而且豆腐就在这些水桶里,你会用钳子夹起这些巨大的豆腐块,就像人们从佛蒙特州 19 世纪的池塘里拉出冰山一样。
And so I would say that between the religious element and the strange world of health food .
所以我想说的是,在宗教元素和保健食品的奇怪世界之间。
.
。
.
。
You’d go to a health-food store and you’d have the health-food restaurant here, and you’d have the New Age bookstore next to it — they’d always be attached — and you would always have the same books.
你去一家保健食品店,这里就有一家保健食品餐厅,旁边就有一家新时代书店 —— 它们总是相连的 —— 而且你总是会看到同样的书。
You’d have the Utne Reader and all those kinds of magazines.
你会有 Utne Reader 和所有这些类型的杂志。
But at the same time I was having in certain ways a conventional upper-middle-class, southern-Connecticut background.
但与此同时,我在某些方面拥有传统的康涅狄格州南部的中上层阶级背景。
And I think I had that weird combination of normalcy in certain ways, religious experiments over here, dietary experiments that blended into weird cultural experiments over there.
我认为我在某些方面有一种奇怪的常态组合,这里的宗教实验,饮食实验融入了那里奇怪的文化实验。
It gave me generally an appreciation for the weird diversity of America, that I think I wouldn’t have gotten if my mother hadn’t been ill and sought out strange cures and so on.
它让我对美国奇怪的多样性有了普遍的认识,我想如果我的母亲没有生病并寻求奇怪的治疗方法等等,我就不会得到这种认识。
And it also gave me an appreciation for the fact that there can be things that are true about the universe that are not available through the experience of expert consensus and so on.
这也让我认识到,宇宙中可能有一些真实的东西是无法通过专家共识等经验获得的。
We were very much outside the mainstream during my childhood.
在我的童年时期,我们完全脱离了主流。
And the fact that there was a lot of lies and nonsense and BS outside the mainstream, but there were also things that I’ve held onto and think were true, that’s had a fairly powerful effect on my thinking.
事实上,主流之外有很多谎言、废话和废话,但也有一些我坚持认为是真实的事情,这对我的思考产生了相当大的影响。
We were very much outside the mainstream during my childhood.
在我的童年时期,我们完全脱离了主流。
And the fact that there was a lot of lies and nonsense and BS outside the mainstream, but there were also things that I’ve held onto and think were true, that’s had a fairly powerful effect on my thinking.
事实上,主流之外有很多谎言、废话和废话,但也有一些我坚持认为是真实的事情,这对我的思考产生了相当大的影响。
Not always — like with the anti-vaccine debates, for instance.
并不总是如此——例如,就像反疫苗辩论一样。
The anti-vaccine side seems to me to be pretty much just wrong and obviously dangerous in certain ways and so on.
在我看来,反疫苗一方几乎是错误的,并且在某些方面显然是危险的等等。
But there is always a small part of my mind and experience that wants to stick up for the anti-vaccine side, which I don’t do in the pages of the New York Times because there is no compelling argument I can see, and it does a disservice to millions of children to make an argument that people shouldn’t vaccinate their kids.
但我的思想和经验中总有一小部分想要坚持反对疫苗的一面,但我不会在《纽约时报》的版面上这么做,因为我看不到令人信服的论据,而且提出人们不应该给孩子接种疫苗的论点对数百万儿童来说是一种伤害。
That’s all true, and well, and good.
这都是真的,而且很好。
But something like the anti-vaccine crusade will be proven correct.
但像反疫苗运动这样的事情将被证明是正确的。
There are weird ideas out there right now that are actually true.
现在有一些奇怪的想法实际上是正确的。
And I think the strangeness of my childhood, that’s something that I carry with me as an assumption.
我认为我童年的奇怪之处是我随身携带的一种假设。
Three more quick questions before I turn it over to all of your questions.
在我把它转给你们所有的问题之前,还有三个简单的问题。
How people pronounce your last name: What does it tell you about their class backgrounds or otherwise?
人们如何发音你的姓氏:它告诉你他们的阶级背景或其他方面的什么信息?
There are two main ways to mispronounce Douthat.
Douthat 的发音错误主要有两种方式。
The first is to say “Do that.” And the second one is to say “Du tá.” And, essentially, as you climb the pretension ladder in America, the “Du tá” mispronunciation becomes more prevalent, whereas when I was in middle school in fourth grade the “Do that” mispronunciation was more prevalent.
第一个是说“这样做”。第二个是说“Du tá”。而且,本质上,当你在美国攀登自命不凡的阶梯时,“Du tá”的错误发音变得更加普遍,而当我在中学四年级时,“Do that”的错误发音更加普遍。
But you can always tell whether someone’s gone to graduate school or not by whether they try and mispronounce it as a French last name.
但你总是可以通过某人是否尝试将其读错为法国姓氏来判断他是否读过研究生。
You wrote a New York Times column yesterday on sterility, and you cite three different individuals as wondering that maybe sex will be too much pushed out of American life.
你昨天写了一篇关于不孕症的《纽约时报》专栏,你引用了三个不同的人的观点,认为性可能会被过多地排除在美国人的生活之外。
One was Masha Gessen, who of course is from former Soviet Union; Cathy Young, who grew up in Moscow; and Geraldo Rivera, who actually is half-Jewish-Russian.
其中之一是玛莎·格森(Masha Gessen),她当然来自前苏联; Cathy Young,在莫斯科长大;还有杰拉尔多·里维拉(Geraldo Rivera),他实际上有一半犹太俄罗斯血统。
So all three of the people you cited, whether you’re aware of it or not —
所以你引用的所有三个人,无论你是否意识到——
Did not think of that, yeah.
没想到,是啊。
— are Russian, and they’re the ones worrying.
— 是俄罗斯人,他们才是令人担忧的人。
What do you infer from this?
你由此推断出什么?
That Russia is a very cold country.
俄罗斯是一个非常寒冷的国家。
No.
不。
I do think there is absolutely no question that people who have lived experience of totalitarianism, which I do not, thankfully, tend to fear anything that smacks of totalitarian impulses, and so to the extent that there’s .
我确实认为,毫无疑问,经历过极权主义的人(谢天谢地,我没有经历过极权主义)往往会害怕任何带有极权主义冲动的东西,所以在某种程度上……。
.
。
.
。
I’m not sure about the Geraldo case, but…
我不确定杰拉尔多案的情况,但是……
His seemed more like a self-justification for a life badly lived, but to the extent that there is actually something there, then, yeah, I think it’s a normal reaction to being traumatized by authoritarianism.
他看起来更像是对糟糕生活的自我辩解,但如果确实有一些东西存在的话,那么,是的,我认为这是对受独裁主义创伤的正常反应。
On the Ross Douthat production function
关于 Ross Douthat 生产函数
Last question, and this is also a perennial.
最后一个问题,这也是一个常年问题。
You became famous at a very young age; you’ve published four books; youngest New York Times op-ed columnist ever.
你很小的时候就出名了;你已经出版了四本书; 《纽约时报》有史以来最年轻的专栏作家。
The last two years you’ve even had health problems; you’ve continued to be, as far as I can tell, as productive as ever.
过去两年你甚至出现了健康问题;据我所知,你一如既往地高效。
What is the Ross Douthat production function?
Ross Douthat 生产函数是什么?
What is your productivity secret that maybe is undervalued by other people?
您可能被其他人低估的生产力秘诀是什么?
There’s plenty that goes into what you produce, but what would be an insight you would share with us as to how you get this all done?
您的作品涉及很多内容,但是您会与我们分享关于如何完成这一切的见解吗?
Undertaking family obligations certainly helps, as a motivating force.
承担家庭义务无疑会有所帮助,成为一种动力。
I think that male productivity is — I don’t want to say this isn’t true of female productivity too, but I only have the male experience to go by — I think male productivity is often .
我认为男性生产力是 — 我不想说女性生产力也不是这样,但我只有男性的经验可以参考 — 我认为男性生产力通常是......。
.
。
.
。
It’s often closely linked to being bound to and linked to other people, and having kids and a family and so on.
它通常与与他人的联系和联系、拥有孩子和家庭等密切相关。
I think that that’s a not uncommon root of greater productivity.
我认为这是提高生产力的一个并不罕见的根源。
And I’m certain it’s true in my own case.
我确信我自己的情况也是如此。
I wasn’t married that young, but I was married younger than many people in my cohort.
我没有那么年轻就结婚了,但我比我的同龄人中的许多人结婚得更年轻。
And, I don’t know, you also .
而且,我不知道,你也是。
.
。
.
。
I mean, journalism, you go to events with wonderful hosts and audiences and so on and people sometimes introduce you as a public intellectual.
我的意思是,新闻业,你去参加一些活动,有很棒的主持人和观众等等,人们有时会把你介绍为公共知识分子。
Sometimes they even say “thought leader,” and that’s the worst.
有时他们甚至说“思想领袖”,这是最糟糕的。
When I run my totalitarian state .
当我管理我的极权国家时。
.
。
.
。
No.
不。
But journalism is a trade, right?
但新闻业是一种贸易,对吗?
I mean there is obviously an intellectual component.
我的意思是,这显然有一个智力成分。
And we wouldn’t have been able to sit here and have this conversation with me babbling at you if I didn’t have intellectual pretensions.
如果我没有知识分子的自命不凡,我们就不可能坐在这里和我对你胡言乱语。
But the work of journalism — this is less true in the age of the internet — but it is linked to a very physical thing that comes out every week, or every month, or every day, and it comes out and it has to be filled.
但新闻工作 ——在互联网时代,情况就不那么真实了—— 但它与每周、每月或每天都会出现的非常物质的东西联系在一起,它出现了,就必须被填补。
There is a place on the New York Times, on the printed New York Times, that would be blank or have an ad stuck on it if I didn’t write my column.
《纽约时报》上,印刷版《纽约时报》上有一个地方,如果我不写专栏,那地方就会是空白的,或者上面贴着广告。
And so you write the column.
所以你写了这个专栏。
You write the column.
你写专栏。
And it’s useful for journalists to think about it this way — it’s useful for anyone inclined to over-romanticize or over-admire journalists to think about it this way.
对于记者来说,这样思考是有用的——对于任何倾向于过度浪漫化或过度崇拜记者的人来说,这样思考是有用的。
But there is a sense in which writing a column is — it’s like you’re a plumber.
但从某种意义上说,写专栏就像你是一名水管工。
The toilet has to be fixed, so you fix the toilet.
厕所要修,所以你修厕所。
The column has to be written, so you write the column.
专栏必须写,所以你写专栏。
And getting lost .
并且迷路了。
.
。
.
。
There’s another version of myself that was going to write novels —
我的另一个版本是要写小说——
Fantasy novels.
奇幻小说。
Fantasy novels — that was going to follow these aesthetic and narrative ambitions, that you rightly discern lurking below the surface of my analysis of the Republican tax plan, or whatever.
奇幻小说——将遵循这些美学和叙事野心,你可以正确地看出潜伏在我对共和党税收计划或其他什么的分析的表面之下。
And maybe that version of myself would have produced the great American novel, some great work.
也许那个版本的我会创作出伟大的美国小说,一些伟大的作品。
Certainly I like to imagine that — or at least something that sold as well as George R.
当然,我喜欢想象——或者至少是和乔治·R·布什一样畅销的东西。
R.
R。
Martin.
马丁.
But it also might be the case that if I had spent my life sitting around with my unfinished novels, I never would have produced anything interesting.
但也可能是这样,如果我一生都坐在未完成的小说上,我永远不会写出任何有趣的东西。
And so it’s better to be a tradesman, and that’s at least part of how I think about my job.
因此,最好是成为一名商人,这至少是我对自己工作的部分看法。
We will get to your questions in a moment, but Ross, thank you very much.
我们稍后会回答你的问题,但是罗斯,非常感谢你。
There’s another version of myself that was going to write novels…but it also might be the case that if I had spent my life sitting around with my unfinished novels, I never would have produced anything interesting.
我的另一个版本是要写小说……但也可能是这样,如果我一生都坐在未完成的小说上,我永远不会写出任何有趣的东西。
And so it’s better to be a tradesman, and that’s at least part of how I think about my job.
因此,最好是成为一名商人,这至少是我对自己工作的部分看法。
Q&A
问答
I was wondering how you thought the development of artificial wombs will change the politics of the abortion debate.
我想知道您认为人造子宫的发展将如何改变堕胎辩论的政治。
A softball.
垒球。
Well, it’ll be interesting if we do actually develop artificial wombs, which I’m not 100 percent sure that we will.
好吧,如果我们真的开发出人造子宫,那将会很有趣,但我不能百分百确定我们会这么做。
But supposing that we do, my expectation would be that it would be .
但假设我们这样做了,我的期望是。
.
。
.
。
It would create a weird cultural crisis for the kind of people who currently are pro-life, while also creating substantial political pressure in favor of the pro-life cause.
这将为目前反堕胎的人们造成一场奇怪的文化危机,同时也会产生支持反堕胎事业的巨大政治压力。
And I’m not entirely sure how those two things would interact with one another.
我并不完全确定这两件事将如何相互作用。
But you would clearly have a sort of deep religious resistance to the technology, to the practice, to that sort of severing, and you would have strong cultural resistance to it independent of religion.
但显然,你会对技术、实践、这种分割产生一种深刻的宗教抵制,而且你也会对它产生独立于宗教的强烈文化抵制。
I think there would be a strong anti-artificial-womb .
我想会有很强的反人工子宫的作用。
.
。
.
。
As in the crunchy bookstores of my childhood, there would be a left-wing, hippyish resistance to it as well.
就像我童年时在脆脆的书店里一样,也会有左翼、嬉皮士式的抵制。
The question would be, How would that resistance to it interact with this possibility that here you have a technocratic solution to the abortion debate?
问题是,对堕胎辩论的抵制与技术官僚解决堕胎辩论的可能性如何相互作用?
But I’ll say I’m a little skeptical that, if you imagine .
但我会说我有点怀疑,如果你想象的话。
.
。
.
。
Again, it depends; how do you get to the artificial womb point?
同样,这取决于;如何到达人工子宫点?
Is it something where — are you imagining a world where a woman gets pregnant and somehow the embryo is removed from her body and placed into the womb?
这是不是……你想象一个女人怀孕后胚胎以某种方式从她体内取出并放入子宫的世界?
That seems .
看来。
.
。
.
。
requiring a level of technological intervention that would raise a host of the same privacy concerns and so on that motivate certain portions of the pro-choice side.
需要一定程度的技术干预,这会引起许多相同的隐私问题,等等,从而激发支持堕胎一方的某些部分。
Or are you envisioning a world where you have artificial wombs and everyone is provisionally sterilized at age 14?
或者你是否正在想象一个拥有人工子宫并且每个人在 14 岁时都进行临时绝育的世界?
This becomes the state policy, and so on?
这成为国家政策等等?
So you could imagine a pro-life totalitarianism that emerged out of some combination of technologies.
所以你可以想象一种反堕胎极权主义是由一些技术组合产生的。
All of which is to say I don’t have a brilliant answer for your question, but I think there would be a lot of very strange and different cross currents that the people most inclined to make the pro-life argument right now would be disinclined to immediately run with whatever political possibilities had presented, but also that the nature of the technology, its level of invasiveness and what making it work would mean, would in turn determine where liberalism went, and so on.
所有这些都是说,我对你的问题没有一个出色的答案,但我认为会有很多非常奇怪和不同的交叉潮流,现在最倾向于提出反堕胎论点的人们将不愿意立即接受任何政治可能性,而且技术的本质、其侵入性程度以及使其发挥作用意味着什么,将反过来决定自由主义的走向,等等。
Next question.
下一个问题。
Is Mormonism anti-American?
摩门教是反美的吗?
Or quintessentially American?
还是典型的美国风格?
Quintessentially American, surely.
当然,这是典型的美国风格。
I think that there’s —
我认为有——
It’s interesting in that Mormon sexual ethics have repeatedly brought them into conflict with the dominant American culture.
有趣的是,摩门教的性道德一再与美国主流文化发生冲突。
That fact and that reality is a sign that there exists some interesting tension between Mormonism and America as a whole.
这一事实和现实表明,摩门教和整个美国之间存在着一些有趣的紧张关系。
But nonetheless, Mormonism is — both in its actual lived experience and its theology — is unimaginable without .
但尽管如此,如果没有……,摩门教——无论是在其实际生活经验还是神学上——都是不可想象的。
.
。
.
。
It has an American essence.
它有美国的精髓。
There’s no more American figure in certain ways than Joseph Smith.
在某些方面,没有人比约瑟夫·史密斯更适合美国。
The entire Mormon theology is built around an attempt .
整个摩门教神学都是围绕着一种尝试而建立的。
.
。
.
。
We were talking earlier about how could you integrate Islam, Judaism, and Christianity into one story, and I was failing to give Tyler a good answer.
我们之前讨论过如何将伊斯兰教、犹太教和基督教整合到一个故事中,但我未能给泰勒一个好的答案。
Mormonism is an attempt to do that, not with three religious traditions, but with the Americas.
摩门教试图做到这一点,不是针对三种宗教传统,而是针对美洲。
How do you integrate the Americas into what seems like the Old World–dominated story of Judaism and Christianity?
你如何将美洲融入到看似旧世界主导的犹太教和基督教故事中?
And that is .
那就是。
.
。
.
。
To the extent that Mormonism is out to solve a problem, it’s to solve the problem of what about the Americas?
就摩门教是为了解决问题而言,它是为了解决美洲的问题?
What about all this world over here?
这里的世界又如何呢?
In that way and various others that I could go on listing, I think the tensions between Mormonism and the dominant American culture still leaves it quintessentially American, just as .
通过这种方式以及我可以继续列出的其他各种方式,我认为摩门教与美国主流文化之间的紧张关系仍然使其具有典型的美国特色,就像……
.
。
.
。
Let’s say, the drug culture of the late 1960s was in tension with bourgeois American society at that point, but Woodstock — there’s nothing more American than Woodstock.
比方说,20 世纪 60 年代末的毒品文化与当时的美国资产阶级社会关系紧张,但伍德斯托克音乐节——没有什么比伍德斯托克音乐节更美国化了。
And in the same way, even when it’s in tension with whatever else is going on in the culture, there’s nothing more American than the Latter Day Saints.
同样地,即使它与文化中正在发生的其他事情发生冲突,没有什么比后期圣徒更美国化了。
Next question.
下一个问题。
Hi.
你好。
One thing that I’ve been seeing a lot of recently is your tweet storm on fertility and the child tax credit.
我最近经常看到的一件事是你关于生育和儿童税收抵免的推文风暴。
One of the criticisms that keeps coming up is that there’s no reason to think that the child tax credit would actually be an effective movement of fertility rates.
不断出现的批评之一是,没有理由认为儿童税收抵免实际上会有效地改变生育率。
So, two-part question: Do you think the importance of the child tax credit is mostly symbolic, or actually effective?
因此,问题由两部分组成:您认为儿童税收抵免的重要性主要是象征性的,还是实际上有效的?
And, second, if you were put on a committee and tasked with offering one piece of policy that would raise the American fertility rate in a sustainable way, what would that policy be?
其次,如果你被安排加入一个委员会,并负责提供一项以可持续方式提高美国生育率的政策,那么这项政策会是什么?
So those of us who are involved in the selling of the child tax credit to Republican politicians tended to make an argument that wasn’t per se about the fertility rate.
因此,我们这些参与向共和党政客兜售儿童税收抵免的人往往会提出一个本身与生育率无关的论点。
There was an argument that this was a matter of distributional justice, that the tax code was penalizing parents in various ways because of their kids’ contributions to Social Security, and so on, through a rather elaborate schema — that I think was true and correct.
有人认为这是分配正义的问题,税法因为孩子对社会保障的贡献而以各种方式惩罚父母,等等,通过一个相当复杂的模式 ——我认为这是真实和正确的。
That argument had some flaws, but I think, by and large, it was a reasonable argument.
这个论点有一些缺陷,但我认为,总的来说,这是一个合理的论点。
But it was also an argument sort of geared to satisfy the slightly sclerotic ideological preconceptions of the Republican party, and sitting here before you fine people tonight, I’ll just say the goal of the child tax credit is to help people have more babies.
但这也是一种旨在满足共和党稍微僵化的意识形态先入之见的论点,今晚坐在你们面前,我只想说儿童税收抵免的目标是帮助人们生更多的孩子。
That should be the actual goal and when the Wall Street Journal accuses it of being social engineering — it is social engineering, and I’m happy to admit it, and maybe there’ll be a Wall Street Journal editorial about this tomorrow.
这应该是真正的目标,当《华尔街日报》指责它是社会工程时——它就是社会工程,我很高兴承认这一点,也许明天《华尔街日报》会发表一篇关于此的社论。
But I think in the same way that the Wall Street Journal’s preferred economic policies, which they hope will spur entrepreneurship and new hiring and business formation and all these things, are also social engineering in a certain way.
但我认为,《华尔街日报》偏爱的经济政策(他们希望这些政策能够刺激创业、新的招聘和企业组建以及所有这些事情)在某种程度上也是社会工程。
I don’t think that you can .
我认为你做不到。
.
。
.
。
I don’t believe in some pristine separation of the economic sphere (which isn’t social engineering) and your tax policies (aren’t social engineering) from the family.
我不相信经济领域(这不是社会工程)和税收政策(不是社会工程)与家庭的某种原始分离。
The baseline is, I’m in favor of giving people money to help them have the babies that they want to have.
底线是,我赞成给人们钱来帮助他们生下他们想要的孩子。
Now, would the child tax credit have accomplished that to the extent that it would have much effect?
那么,儿童税收抵免是否能够实现这一目标并产生很大的影响呢?
I would say it was a bare and very minimal effect.
我想说这只是一个赤裸裸的、非常微小的影响。
I think if you look at the literature, you need something much, much larger to have any hope of moving the needle.
我认为如果你看一下文献,你需要一些非常非常大的东西才能有希望取得进展。
But I wouldn’t say it’s symbolic.
但我不会说这是象征性的。
I think it’s a step in the direction that I would like American society to take, which would take us towards something that wasn’t a $2,000 per child tax credit, but a $5,000 per child tax credit and so on, even upward from there.
我认为这是朝着我希望美国社会采取的方向迈出的一步,这将带领我们迈向每名儿童 2,000 美元的税收抵免,而是每名儿童 5,000 美元的税收抵免等等,甚至更高。
So those are my maximalist ambitions.
这些就是我的最高目标。
Now, it is also true that cultural forms and assumptions and so on play a much more important shaping role in all this, and it might be the case that even if you got to my ideal number that it wouldn’t move the dial that much.
现在,文化形式和假设等在这一切中确实发挥着更重要的塑造作用,而且可能出现的情况是,即使你达到了我的理想数字,它也不会改变太多。
But in that case, I would still favor it in part as a means of .
但在这种情况下,我仍然倾向于将其部分作为一种手段。
.
。
.
。
I think there’s value in building the foundations in political economy for the cultural changes that you wish to see even if those changes haven’t arrived yet.
我认为为你希望看到的文化变革奠定政治经济学基础是有价值的,即使这些变革尚未到来。
So it might be that the child tax credit’s effect would be counteracted by the deranging influence of screams on people’s romantic lives, or something.
因此,儿童税收抵免的效果可能会被尖叫对人们浪漫生活等的混乱影响所抵消。
That might be the case.
情况可能就是这样。
But then the child tax credit would still be there waiting for the Butlerian Jihad of the future.
但儿童税收抵免仍将在那里等待未来的巴特勒圣战。
The people who laughed are Dune readers and everyone else is not.
笑的人是《沙丘》的读者,而其他人则不是。
It’s good; it’s important at some point in every public event to separate the Dune readers from the non-Dune readers.
很好;在每次公共活动的某个时刻,将《沙丘》读者与非《沙丘》读者区分开来是很重要的。
But until the moment arrives when we get a handle on our technological problems and achieve some cultural shift.
但直到我们解决技术问题并实现某种文化转变的那一刻到来。
But anyway, yes, the long story short, at least on the roster of plausible policies, that would be the policy that I would offer.
但无论如何,是的,长话短说,至少在看似合理的政策名册上,这将是我将提供的政策。
And I think the goal is to .
我认为目标是。
.
。
.
。
It probably wouldn’t have that much influence in its existing form, but the goal would be to get to a form where it did have a chance of having influence.
以现有的形式,它可能不会有那么大的影响力,但目标是达到一种它确实有机会产生影响力的形式。
Next question.
下一个问题。
In relation to your upcoming book, obviously, there’s been many Christian denominations, like Eastern Orthodox, certain conservative Protestant groups, that have a less strict line on the divorce question without entirely succumbing to the cultural liberalism that’s undermined a lot of Christianity in the West.
就你即将出版的书而言,显然,有许多基督教教派,如东正教、某些保守的新教团体,在离婚问题上没有那么严格,但又没有完全屈服于破坏西方基督教的文化自由主义。
So in light of that my question to you is, is your objection to the pope’s potential shift so much due to his actual proposals, or more the therapeutic language itself making the case that you find problematic?
因此,鉴于此,我向您提出的问题是,您对教皇潜在转变的反对很大程度上是由于他的实际建议,还是更多的治疗语言本身使您发现了问题?
No, I think it’s the proposal itself.
不,我认为这是提案本身。
There’s a sort of “sociology of religion” argument that conservative Christians tend to get into that you’re referencing on these questions where you say, “stricter churches do better at weathering the storms of modernity than more lax churches,” and “there’s value in having a church that is explicitly pushing back against cultural trends,” and so on.
有一种保守派基督徒倾向于陷入的“宗教社会学”论点,你在这些问题上提到,“更严格的教会比更宽松的教会更能经受住现代性的风暴”,以及“拥有一个明确反对文化趋势的教会是有价值的”,等等。
I think all of those arguments are in some cases plausible; I think they would be plausible in this case.
我认为所有这些论点在某些情况下都是合理的。我认为在这种情况下他们是合理的。
I think a therapeutic shift on divorce would have negative practical effects on the everyday lives of Catholics.
我认为离婚治疗的转变会对天主教徒的日常生活产生负面的实际影响。
But the reason the issue is particularly important to me, and the reason I’ve written about it so much, is that I think the church is risking betraying its connection to Jesus.
但这个问题对我来说特别重要,也是我写了这么多文章的原因,是因为我认为教会正在冒着背叛与耶稣联系的风险。
And that’s .
那就是。
.
。
.
。
The sociological stuff is important, but it’s secondary.
社会学的东西很重要,但它是次要的。
To me, one of .
对我来说,其中之一。
.
。
.
。
I referenced the essential radicalism of Christianity, and obviously Catholicism has not been, in political practice, a radical force at every moment in human history.
我提到了基督教本质上的激进主义,显然,在政治实践中,天主教并不是人类历史上每一个时刻的激进力量。
But one of the great things about the Catholic Church and one of the things that makes me think the probabilistic game that Tyler somehow induced me to play online, one reason I give it a high probability of being the one true church is that there are these core, very strange and radical things that Jesus says and does that are sustained in the life of the church in ways that they haven’t been in other Christian denominations and churches and one of those is the Eucharist, the idea of transubstantiation, the idea that you are literally consuming the body and blood of Christ.
但天主教会的伟大之处之一,也是让我想到泰勒以某种方式诱导我在网上玩的概率游戏的原因之一,我认为它很有可能成为唯一真正的教会的原因之一是,耶稣所说和所做的这些核心、非常奇怪和激进的事情在教会的生活中以其他基督教教派和教会所没有的方式持续存在,其中之一就是圣体圣事,变质的想法,你实际上是消耗基督的身体和血。
Another of them is this .
其中另一个是这个。
.
。
.
。
another thing I referenced earlier: this persistence of priestly, religious, monastic vocations, this idea of Christianity as a counterculture to the point where it is actively turning its back on family life in certain ways and retaining this space for a radical core, a radical witness.
我之前提到的另一件事:这种对牧师、宗教、修道院职业的坚持,这种基督教作为反主流文化的观念,以至于它以某种方式积极地背弃家庭生活,并为激进的核心、激进的见证人保留了这个空间。
And another of them is the teaching on marriage and divorce, which in the context of the New Testament is clearly presented as a kind of radicalization of Jewish law on marriage and divorce, and the church has maintained that radical perspective.
其中另一个是关于婚姻和离婚的教导,在新约的背景下,这显然是犹太婚姻和离婚法的一种激进化,而教会一直保持着这种激进的观点。
And I think it’s done so in fidelity to the man that we think was the Son of God, and I would prefer it to continue to maintain that fidelity rather than softly give it up.
我认为这样做是为了忠于我们认为是上帝之子的人,我更希望它继续保持这种忠诚,而不是轻易放弃。
Next question.
下一个问题。
So I was actually going to ask you about the necessity of a Butlerian Jihad.
所以我实际上想问你巴特勒圣战的必要性。
Good!
好的!
Good, good.
好,好。
Since you’re already on board, I’ll skip straight to practicality.
既然你已经加入了,我将直接跳到实用性。
What form do you think it should take, how extreme do you think it should be, and would you be willing to lead it?
你认为它应该采取什么形式,你认为它应该有多极端,你愿意领导它吗?
So the Butlerian Jihad is an event that takes place in the universe of Dune, the science fiction novels by Frank Herbert, and takes place in the distant past, although his son wrote some other novels that try and lay out how it happened.
因此,巴特勒圣战是发生在弗兰克·赫伯特的科幻小说《沙丘》宇宙中的事件,发生在遥远的过去,尽管他的儿子写了一些其他小说试图阐述它是如何发生的。
They don’t count.
他们不算数。
They don’t count, thank you.
他们不算数,谢谢。
No, I’m a big .
不,我是个大人。
.
。
.
。
Dune itself, I’m a huge fan of.
沙丘本身,我是它的超级粉丝。
I could never actually finish all of Herbert’s novels, which makes me a Dune noncompletist, which means I might be the wrong person to lead the Butlerian Jihad.
我永远无法真正读完赫伯特的所有小说,这使我成为沙丘不完整主义者,这意味着我可能不是领导巴特勒圣战的人选。
But the Butlerian Jihad is this rebellion against .
但巴特勒圣战正是针对这种叛乱。
.
。
.
。
I think it is, maybe you can correct me, but it’s AI more that it’s a rebellion against, rather than computers per se, or is it .
我认为是的,也许你可以纠正我,但它更多的是对人工智能的反叛,而不是对计算机本身的反叛,或者是……。
.
。
.
。
I would have to reread —
我得重读——
You would have to .
你必须这样做。
.
。
.
。
Well, anyway, it’s some sort of rebellion against the use of computational replacements for human beings.
好吧,无论如何,这是对人类使用计算替代品的某种反抗。
And so you have this far-distant spacefaring culture that relies on Mentats, these humans who have developed their intellect to somewhat superhuman levels — perhaps through the use of CRISPR — thereby I’m trying to unite all the themes of tonight, Tyler — But they don’t use certain forms of computing power that we would assume people in the far future would.
因此,这种遥远的太空文化依赖于门塔特人,这些人类的智力已经发展到了某种超人的水平 ——“也许通过使用 CRISPR —— 因此我试图将今晚的所有主题统一起来,泰勒 —— 但他们不使用我们假设的遥远未来的人们会使用的某些形式的计算能力。
Anyway, that’s the necessary background.
无论如何,这是必要的背景。
My view for a short-term Butlerian Jihad is much more limited and boring.
我对短期巴特勒圣战的看法更加有限和无聊。
I think that people should limit or reduce or eliminate the use of computers and screens and digital devices for children and in schools up to a certain age.
我认为人们应该限制、减少或消除儿童和学校中特定年龄以下的计算机、屏幕和数字设备的使用。
And I’m flexible and could argue about what that age should be.
我很灵活,可以争论这个年龄应该是多少。
But I think that young childhood certainly should not be a place .
但我认为,童年肯定不应该是一个地方。
.
。
.
。
I think that young human beings should be given a sustained encounter with actual physical and social reality before being placed in front of a screen.
我认为年轻人在被放置在屏幕前之前应该持续接触实际的身体和社会现实。
And I think that that should be educational common sense.
我认为这应该是教育常识。
And that we’ve gone in the opposite direction is an unfortunate thing.
我们走向了相反的方向是一件不幸的事情。
So, I think you start with that and then we can talk about future steps.
所以,我认为你可以从这个开始,然后我们可以讨论未来的步骤。
Like, I don’t know, yeah.
就像,我不知道,是的。
We can talk.
我们可以谈谈。
I don’t want to suggest any, in case I’m quoted out of context, but you can imagine next steps.
我不想提出任何建议,以防我被断章取义,但你可以想象接下来的步骤。
We’ll just stick with that educational step first.
我们首先会坚持教育步骤。
I have a question from my iPad screen right here.
我的 iPad 屏幕上有一个问题。
I can’t take it, Tyler.
我受不了,泰勒。
The Jihad is happening even as we speak.
就在我们说话的时候,圣战正在发生。
The wires are being cut.
电线正在被切断。
The cloud is being dismantled.
云正在被拆除。
“If and when artificial intelligence comes along, how will this change our understanding of religion?”
“如果人工智能出现,这将如何改变我们对宗教的理解?”
I think that if human beings could actually create consciousness, it would .
我认为,如果人类真的能够创造意识,那就会的。
.
。
.
。
an actual conscious AI — that it would tell us something about consciousness that we don’t currently know, that would have some unknowable influence on theological debates.
一个真正有意识的人工智能——它会告诉我们一些我们目前不知道的关于意识的事情,这会对神学辩论产生一些不可知的影响。
I think that if you look at where some of the smartest non-Christian, nontheistic critics of eliminative materialism end up, someone like Thomas Nagel or something, they end up in the pantheist or panpsychist kind of vision where mind is a kind of emergent property of the universe.
我认为,如果你看看一些最聪明的非基督教、非有神论的取消唯物主义批评者最终的结局,比如托马斯·内格尔之类的人,他们最终会陷入泛神论或泛心论的视野,其中心灵是宇宙的一种新兴财产。
(I might be getting that slightly wrong, but that might be the idea.) I think that there are versions of AI that you could imagine emerging that could be claimed as .
(我可能有点错,但这可能就是这个想法。)我认为你可以想象出现的人工智能版本可以被称为.
.
。
.
。
Well, I don’t know.
好吧,我不知道。
There’s something about consciousness that we don’t understand, obviously.
显然,关于意识,有些东西我们不理解。
And I’m very skeptical of the idea that we’re just going to get through some Moore’s law doubling .
我对我们将要经历摩尔定律翻倍的想法非常怀疑。
.
。
.
。
we’re going to a recognizable consciousness by accident; Skynet is going to become self-aware or something.
我们会偶然地进入一个可识别的意识;天网将会变得有自我意识什么的。
I think that there would have to be some remarkable breakthrough, and I don’t know what the nature of the breakthrough would be, but I think it would at least contribute something to theological debates about the mind’s place in the cosmos.
我认为必须有一些显着的突破,我不知道突破的本质是什么,但我认为它至少会对关于心灵在宇宙中的位置的神学辩论做出一些贡献。
Do you think that social media is contributing to polarization and a breakdown of discourse more generally?
您认为社交媒体是否会导致两极分化和更普遍的话语崩溃?
And, especially, can you comment on its effect on journalists and journalism?
特别是,您能评论一下它对记者和新闻业的影响吗?
Sure.
当然。
I don’t want to, having done my Butlerian Jihad rant, I don’t want to oversell the horrors of social media, because I think if you look at a lot of the polarization in American life, it’s being driven by an older technology: cable television.
在发表了巴特勒圣战咆哮之后,我不想过分夸大社交媒体的恐怖,因为我认为,如果你看看美国生活中的许多两极分化,就会发现它是由一种较旧的技术驱动的:有线电视。
And that the effect of cable news on older Americans probably goes a longer way to explaining some of our polarization right now than does social media.
与社交媒体相比,有线电视新闻对美国老年人的影响可能更能解释我们目前的一些两极分化。
So that would be my caveat.
所以这是我的警告。
With that being said, I think the effect of social media is its .
话虽这么说,我认为社交媒体的效果是它的。
.
。
.
。
Tyler had an interesting — you had an interesting post about this today or yesterday.
泰勒有一个有趣的 ——你今天或昨天有一篇关于这个的有趣的帖子。
Yes, today.
是的,今天。
And you worked out a kind of Hegelian dialectic of different people on Twitter that I wish I could summarize, but I can’t quite.
你在推特上提出了一种关于不同人的黑格尔辩证法,我希望我能总结一下,但我不能。
But at the very least, in my own experience, Twitter and social media generally, it has a deranging effect.
但至少,根据我自己的经验,无论是推特还是社交媒体,它都会产生混乱的效果。
It creates a sort of a sense of permanent crisis and sort of permanent alarm and so on where people have their Facebook feeds where they and their friends are sharing things that confirm their view that the world is coming to an end.
它创造了一种永久性的危机感和永久性的警报等等,人们在 Facebook 上发布信息,他们和他们的朋友分享的东西证实了他们的世界末日即将到来的观点。
And, as a journalist, I feel like I’m often called upon by people in my non-journalistic social circle to sort of reassure them.
而且,作为一名记者,我觉得我经常被非新闻社交圈中的人要求安抚他们。
And of course they’re no longer reassured because during the last election I kept telling them that Trump wasn’t going to be the Republican nominee.
当然,他们不再放心,因为在上次选举期间,我一直告诉他们特朗普不会成为共和党提名人。
And that he probably wasn’t going to be the president.
而且他可能不会成为总统。
So my level of reassurance has been limited by that.
所以我的保证程度因此受到限制。
But I feel like I see a lot of people in my social orbit who aren’t journalists who seem to be — they’re sort of pushed to the edge of panic constantly by what they see in the news and on social media.
但我觉得我的社会轨道上有很多人不是记者,他们似乎是——他们经常被新闻和社交媒体上看到的内容推向恐慌的边缘。
And then they’ll write to me and ask me to explain what’s really going on, which I may not always be able to do.
然后他们会写信给我,要求我解释到底发生了什么,但我可能并不总是能做到。
But to the extent that there’s sort of an obligation for journalists, it’s often, I think, that obligation — to walk people back from the edge of panic, in certain ways.
但就记者的某种义务而言,我认为,这种义务通常是——以某种方式将人们从恐慌的边缘拉回来。
But in terms of its effect on us, it’s a little hard for me to say, because I wasn’t really a journalist before — I was a little bit; I wasn’t on Twitter probably till 2011, so I had some pre-Twitter understanding.
但就它对我们的影响而言,我有点很难说,因为我之前并不是真正的记者 —— 我有一点;我可能直到 2011 年才使用 Twitter,所以我对 Twitter 之前有一些了解。
I mean Twitter .
我指的是推特。
.
。
.
。
It’s a forum .
这是一个论坛。
.
。
.
。
It’s such a journalist-specific forum in certain ways, it’s so geared towards journalistic culture and everyone is on there arguing with each other and sharing stories with each other and so on.
在某些方面,这是一个专门针对记者的论坛,它非常适合新闻文化,每个人都在那里互相争论并互相分享故事等等。
And at its best, I think, it gives people a little more sense of the inner workings of journalism in certain ways, to the extent that I don’t want to be all doom and gloom.
我认为,在最好的情况下,它可以让人们在某些方面对新闻业的内部运作有更多的了解,以至于我不想陷入悲观和沮丧的境地。
There is a virtue in being exposed to watching journalists share stories and have those stories partially discredited and walk back stories and argue over stories and so on.
目睹记者分享故事、部分质疑这些故事、回顾故事、争论故事等等,这是一种美德。
There’s probably value in demystifying some of the work that we do.
揭开我们所做的一些工作的神秘面纱可能是有价值的。
But I assume that it can’t help, but have a kind of .
但我认为它没有帮助,但有一种。
.
。
.
。
It furthers already-existing groupthink among journalists and it has a deranging effect on us.
它进一步加剧了记者中已经存在的群体思维,并对我们产生了混乱的影响。
And one of the big challenges (and we were talking about this before the conversation) is figuring out what is real and what is just Twitter.
最大的挑战之一(我们在谈话之前就讨论过这一点)是弄清楚什么是真实的,什么只是 Twitter。
And at what point does just Twitter become what’s real?
那么什么时候 Twitter 才能成为真实的呢?
Right?
正确的?
Because so much of what I do and what people in my profession do is we’re watching a world that’s happening online, even as we’re trying to describe a world that exists offline.
因为我和我这个行业的人们所做的很多事情都是在观察一个在线发生的世界,即使我们试图描述一个离线存在的世界。
And I am often puzzled by the connection between the two.
我常常对两者之间的联系感到困惑。
I can’t tell: How real is the Alt-Right?
我无法判断:另类右翼有多真实?
That is a question that is very hard for me to answer because the Alt-Right is very real on the internet.
这个问题对我来说很难回答,因为另类右翼在互联网上非常真实。
It doesn’t seem to be particularly real in reality, but maybe social media is reality, or at some point it becomes reality, and then it doesn’t even matter what’s happening out in the real world.
在现实中似乎并不是特别真实,但也许社交媒体就是现实,或者在某个时刻它变成了现实,然后现实世界中发生的事情就不再重要了。
I’m not sure, but we’re — at the very least we are at a point there seems to be some huge disproportion between the importance of a phenomenon on social media and its ability to get any number of men .
我不确定,但我们——至少我们正处在这样一个时刻:社交媒体上的一种现象的重要性与其吸引任意数量男性的能力之间似乎存在着巨大的不成比例。
.
。
.
。
Like, Richard Spencer has the same 60 people showing up for all his events.
就像理查德·斯宾塞 (Richard Spencer) 一样,有 60 人参加他的所有活动。
He can do something, he and others can do something like Charlottesville, but there isn’t a mass movement of the Alt-Right.
他可以做一些事情,他和其他人可以做一些像夏洛茨维尔这样的事情,但没有另类右翼的群众运动。
And there are more profiles of Alt-Right leaders in liberal publications than there are avowed Alt-Righters who will actually show up and carry a tiki torch.
自由派出版物中对另类右翼领导人的介绍,比实际出现并举着提基火炬的公开的另类右翼分子还要多。
And so the question is, But does nonetheless the Alt-Right phenomenon allow us to see some buried psychological reality among white Americans?
所以问题是,尽管如此,另类右翼现象是否能让我们看到美国白人中一些隐藏的心理现实?
Maybe it does, but it’s just very hard to tell.
也许确实如此,但很难说。
One minute, last question.
等一下,最后一个问题。
Back to the Catholic Church.
回到天主教堂。
Sure.
当然。
Good place to close.
关闭的好地方。
If it is in need of revitalization and there is a crisis in the clergy, why can we not open up ordination to anyone who feels that they have a vocation and can comply with any other regulations — such as women and married men?
如果它需要振兴并且神职人员存在危机,为什么我们不能向任何认为自己有圣召并且能够遵守任何其他规定的人开放任命,例如妇女和已婚男子?
I’ll start with married men, because that’s easier.
我将从已婚男人开始,因为那更容易。
I think that the .
我认为 .
.
。
.
。
In that case, there is not any dogmatic prohibition or claim of a dogmatic prohibition; the church ordains men who have been married and has in the past.
在这种情况下,不存在任何教条式禁止或主张教条式禁止;教会任命已经结婚并且过去结过婚的男人。
At the same time, there are structural impediments: the Catholic bureaucracy is not set up to support priests and their families, and that kind of structural impediment is actually incredibly important to thinking about how such a thing would work itself out.
与此同时,还存在结构性障碍:天主教官僚机构的设立并不是为了支持神父及其家人,这种结构性障碍实际上对于思考这样的事情如何解决非常重要。
But there I tend take the sociological argument that I gestured at in answering one of the earlier questions.
但在那里,我倾向于采用我在回答早期问题之一时所指出的社会学论点。
That for the church to give up on the elevation of celibacy, in a way that large-scale married priests inevitably would be seen as doing, would not be a likely source of revitalization and revival in the long run.
从长远来看,教会放弃独身主义的提升,大规模已婚牧师不可避免地会被视为这样做,这不太可能成为复兴和复兴的源泉。
It would represent the church surrendering on a point where it offers something that it is the most contradictory to the dominant culture.
这将代表教会在提供与主流文化最矛盾的东西上投降。
And giving up something that I think is in many ways one of its most valuable countercultural teachings: that a life can be lived well without having sex.
并放弃了我认为在很多方面都是其最有价值的反文化教义之一的东西:即使没有性生活也可以过得很好。
So, in that sense, while there isn’t a doctrinal and dogmatic barrier to it per se (though some people argue that there is), but I think that it would be trading the promise of renewal for the reality of effective cultural surrender in certain ways, which is something I think the church has done on a number of fronts.
因此,从这个意义上说,虽然它本身不存在教义和教条障碍(尽管有些人认为存在),但我认为它将以某些方式用更新的承诺换取有效文化投降的现实,我认为教会在许多方面都做了这件事。
On the question of female priests, I think that there it’s a simpler issue.
关于女牧师的问题,我认为这是一个更简单的问题。
The church probably could be read into my view of aesthetics and narratives as well as everything else.
教堂或许可以解读为我对美学、叙事以及其他一切的看法。
But the argument that Jesus chose only men for the priesthood I think is ultimately less powerful than the argument that God chose Jesus to be his son and he chose to be .
但我认为耶稣只选择男人担任祭司的论点最终不如上帝选择耶稣作为他的儿子而他选择成为他的儿子的论点有力。
.
。
.
。
to perform the central liturgical predecessors of what became Catholic Christianity in the form of a man, and therefore the enactment of the sacrifice of the mass depends on priests who can stand in the person of Jesus Christ and that it makes sense for them to be men.
以人的形式执行天主教基督教的核心礼仪前身,因此弥撒祭祀的制定取决于能够代表耶稣基督的牧师,并且他们成为男人是有意义的。
That doesn’t mean that the church could not — and here I’ll do the Hegelian synthesis thing — it doesn’t mean that the church could not in its governing structures and in the way that the church functions in Rome and elsewhere could not integrate women more fully into the actual governance of the church; I think it can and it should.
这并不意味着教会不能——“在这里我将做黑格尔综合的事情”——这并不意味着教会不能在其治理结构以及罗马和其他地方的教会运作方式中无法将妇女更充分地纳入教会的实际治理;我认为可以而且应该。
But my preference would be for that integration to happen through a revival of female religious orders and nuns.
但我更倾向于通过女性宗教团体和修女的复兴来实现这种融合。
I would much rather have many more nuns in positions of power in Rome than laymen and laywomen.
我宁愿有更多的修女在罗马担任权力职务,而不是平信徒和平信徒。
And again, maybe that’s some strange sort of aesthetic preference as much as it is anything else.
再说一次,也许这与其他任何事情一样都是某种奇怪的审美偏好。
But I think that it would be a more certain path to renewal for the church to find a way to .
但我认为,教会找到一条更确定的更新之路。
.
。
.
。
Yeah, to have a kind of female activism that comes through a revival of the female religious tradition in the church, rather than a sort of attempt to do what Episcopalians and others have already attempted and shift the understanding of the nature of what the priest is in trying to do the mass itself.
是的,通过教会中女性宗教传统的复兴来实现一种女性激进主义,而不是试图做圣公会和其他人已经尝试过的事情,并改变对神父试图做弥撒本身的本质的理解。
Ross, thank you very much.
罗斯,非常感谢你。
Thank you.
谢谢。
Illustration by Sloane Shearman
斯隆·谢尔曼的插图