← Conversations with Tyler

Fareed Zakaria on the Age of Revolutions, the Power of Ideas, and the Rewards of Intellectual Curiosity (Ep. 208)

法里德·扎卡里亚 (Fareed Zakaria) 论革命时代、思想的力量以及求知欲的回报(第 208 集)
2024-03-08 | 官方页面 YouTube

Special thanks to an anonymous donor who “supports the mission of CWT” for sponsoring this transcript.

特别感谢一位“支持 CWT 使命”的匿名捐赠者赞助这份文字记录。

TYLER COWEN

Hello, everyone, and welcome back to Conversations with Tyler.

大家好,欢迎回到《与泰勒对话》。

Today, I’m chatting with Fareed Zakaria, who truly needs no introduction.

今天,我正在与法里德·扎卡里亚聊天,他确实不需要介绍。

But I would like to point out, as of March 26, he has a new and wonderful book out, Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present.

但我想指出的是,截至 3 月 26 日,他出版了一本精彩的新书,《革命时代:从 1600 年至今的进步与反弹》。

Fareed, welcome.

法里德,欢迎。

FAREED ZAKARIA

It’s a huge pleasure to be here.

很高兴来到这里。

I’m a little intimidated, I must confess, because I listen to you.

我必须承认,我有点害怕,因为我听你的。

I’m a fan of the podcast, and you range very widely.

我是播客的粉丝,你的范围非常广泛。

I’m worried you’re going to ask me questions about something I wrote about 15 years ago that I don’t remember.

我担心你会问我关于我 15 年前写的一些我不记得的东西的问题。

COWEN: You will remember it, but I want to start by trying to figure out you.

COWEN:你会记住的,但我想首先尝试了解你。

What did you learn from Khushwant Singh, and when was that?

你从 Khushwant Singh 那里学到了什么?那是在什么时候?

ZAKARIA

This is the dedication of my book, where I decided I was going to try to remember all the people who helped me along the way in my life.

这是我的书的献词,我决定要努力记住所有在我的人生道路上帮助过我的人。

It starts with Khushwant Singh, who is probably, if you’d asked somebody in India 10 years ago, they would have told you he’s the most famous journalist in India.

首先是库什万特·辛格(Khushwant Singh),如果你十年前问印度的某人,他们可能会告诉你他是印度最著名的记者。

I got to know him when I was 10 years old.

我10岁时就认识了他。

He was my mom’s boss.

他是我妈妈的老板。

My mother worked at a magazine called the Illustrated Weekly of India.

我母亲在一家名为《印度画报周刊》的杂志社工作。

He was an extraordinary character.

他是一个非凡的人物。

He was a novelist who had also been a diplomat, and then he had become editor of this magazine.

他是一名小说家,也曾是一名外交官,然后他成为了这本杂志的编辑。

He was a kind of intellectual — I don’t know that we have as many of these kinds of people as we used to.

他是一位知识分子——我不知道我们现在这样的人还没有以前那么多了。

He was a novelist who won a couple of awards for his books.

他是一位小说家,曾因其著作获得过多项奖项。

He was a great lover of the English language and of poetry, in particular.

他非常热爱英语,尤其是诗歌。

It was infectious.

它具有传染性。

He gave me this real love of the language and love of poetry that I still have to this day.

他给了我对语言和诗歌的真正热爱,直到今天我仍然如此。

He, in a sense, taught me how to write, made me understand what good writing was, turned me on to people like George Orwell.

从某种意义上说,他教会了我如何写作,让我明白什么是好的写作,让我对乔治·奥威尔这样的人产生了兴趣。

I just have this very fond memory.

我只是拥有这段非常美好的回忆。

He also taught me how to play tennis, how to swim, all kinds of things.

他还教我如何打网球、如何游泳等等各种各样的事情。

My father was not very athletic, so he filled that role in a way.

我父亲的运动能力不太好,所以他在某种程度上填补了这个角色。

So, that’s who he is.

所以,他就是这样的人。

As you know, the list is long.

如您所知,这个清单很长。

I tried to go through everybody who had really helped me along the way.

我试着回顾一下一路上真正帮助过我的每个人。

COWEN

What was it he saw in you that encouraged him to pay so much attention to you?

他在你身上看到了什么,促使他如此关注你?

You were 10, you say, right?

你说你当时10岁,对吗?

ZAKARIA

Yes.

是的。

I think I’ve always been intellectually very curious.

我想我在智力上一直非常好奇。

I don’t think I’m the smartest person in the world, but I am very intellectually curious.

我不认为我是世界上最聪明的人,但我非常求知欲。

I get fascinated by ideas and why things are some way.

我对各种想法以及事情为何会这样着迷。

Even when I was very young, I remember I would read much more broadly than my peers.

我记得即使在我很小的时候,我的阅读范围就比同龄人要广泛得多。

I think I looked this up once, but Henry Kissinger’s memoirs came out when I was 14, I think.

我想我查过一次,但我想亨利·基辛格的回忆录是在我 14 岁的时候出版的。

I remember reading them because I remember my mom — at that point, she was working at the Times of India.

我记得读过它们是因为我记得我的妈妈——当时她在《印度时报》工作。

They excerpted it.

他们摘录了它。

I remember telling her that they had chosen some of the wrong excerpts, that there were other parts that would have been better.

我记得告诉她他们选择了一些错误的摘录,还有其他部分会更好。

I must have read enough of it to have had an opinion.

我一定读了足够多的内容才能发表意见。

On his father’s socialism

论他父亲的社会主义

COWEN

Why couldn’t you talk Singh out of his Nehruvian socialism?

为什么你不能说服辛格放弃他的尼赫鲁社会主义呢?

He was a great liberal.

他是一位伟大的自由主义者。

He loved free speech, very broad-minded, as you know much better than I do.

他热爱言论自由,心胸非常宽广,这一点你比我更清楚。

But he, on economics, was weak.

但他在经济方面很弱。

Or no?

或者没有?

ZAKARIA

Oh, no, you’re entirely right.

哦,不,你完全正确。

By the way, I would say the same is true of my father, with whom I had many, many such conversations.

顺便说一句,我想说我的父亲也是如此,我和他有过很多很多这样的谈话。

You’d find this interesting, Tyler.

你会发现这很有趣,泰勒。

My father was a young Indian nationalist who — as he once put it to me — made the most important decision in his life, politically, when he was 13 or 14 years old, which was, as a young Indian Muslim, he chose Nehru’s vision of secular democracy as the foundation of a nation rather than Jinnah’s view of religious nationalism.

我父亲是一位年轻的印度民族主义者——正如他曾经对我说的那样——在他 13 或 14 岁时,他在政治上做出了一生中最重要的决定,那就是,作为一名年轻的印度穆斯林,他选择尼赫鲁的世俗民主愿景作为国家的基础,而不是真纳的宗教民族主义观点。

He chose India rather than Pakistan as an Indian Muslim.

他选择印度而不是巴基斯坦作为印度穆斯林。

He was politically so interesting and forward-leaning, but he was a hopeless social — a sort of social democrat, but veering towards socialism.

他在政治上非常有趣且具有前瞻性,但他是一个绝望的社会主义者——一种社会民主党人,但却转向了社会主义。

Both these guys were.

这两个人都是。

Here’s why, I think.

我想这就是原因。

For that whole generation of people — by the way, my father got a scholarship to London University and went to study with Harold Laski, the great British socialist economist.

对于那一代人来说——顺便说一下,我父亲获得了伦敦大学的奖学金,跟随英国伟大的社会主义经济学家哈罗德·拉斯基学习。

Laski told him, “You are actually not an economist; you are a historian.” So, my father went on and got a PhD at London University in Indian history.

拉斯基告诉他:“你实际上不是经济学家;你是历史学家。”因此,我父亲继续在伦敦大学获得印度历史博士学位。

That whole generation of Indians who wanted independence were imbued with .

整整一代想要独立的印度人都充满了这种渴望。

.

。

.

。

There were two things going on.

有两件事正在发生。

One, the only people in Britain who supported Indian independence were the Labour Party and the Fabian Socialists.

第一,英国唯一支持印度独立的人是工党和费边社会主义者。

All their allies were all socialists.

他们所有的盟友都是社会主义者。

There was a common cause and there was a symbiosis because these were your friends, these were your allies, these were the only people supporting you, the cause that mattered the most to you in your life.

有一个共同的事业,也有一种共生关系,因为这些是你的朋友,这些是你的盟友,这些是唯一支持你的人,这些事业对你来说是生命中最重要的。

The second part was, a lot of people who came out of third-world countries felt, “We are never going to catch up with the West if we just wait for the market to work its way over hundreds of years.” They looked at, in the ’30s, the Soviet Union and thought, “This is a way to accelerate modernization, industrialization.” They all were much more comfortable with the idea of something that sped up the historical process of modernization.

第二部分是,许多来自第三世界国家的人感到,“如果我们只是等待市场发挥作用数百年,我们永远无法赶上西方。”他们观察了20世纪30年代的苏联并认为:“这是加速现代化、工业化的一种方式。”他们都对加速现代化历史进程的想法感到更加满意。

My own view was, that was a big mistake, though I do think there are elements of what the state was able to do that perhaps were better done in a place like South Korea than in India, but that really explains it.

我自己的观点是,这是一个很大的错误,尽管我确实认为国家能够做的某些事情也许在韩国这样的地方比在印度做得更好,但这确实解释了这一点。

My father was in Britain in ’45 as a student.

45 年,我父亲在英国读书。

As a British subject then, you got to vote in the election if you were in London, if you were in Britain.

作为英国臣民,如果你在伦敦,如果你在英国,你就必须在选举中投票。

I said to him, “Who did you vote for in the 1945 election?” Remember, this is the famous election right after World War II, in which Churchill gets defeated, and he gets up the next morning and looks at the papers, and his wife says to him, “Darling, it’s a blessing in disguise.” He says, “Well, at the moment it seems very effectively disguised.”

我对他说:“1945 年的选举你把票投给了谁?”请记住,这是二战后著名的选举,丘吉尔在这次选举中失败了,第二天早上他起床看报纸,他的妻子对他说:“亲爱的,这真是因祸得福。”他说:“嗯,目前看来它伪装得非常有效。”

My father voted in that election.

我父亲在那次选举中投票了。

I said to him, “You’re a huge fan of Churchill,” because I’d grown up around all the Churchill books, and my father could quote the speeches.

我对他说,“你是丘吉尔的超级粉丝”,因为我是在所有丘吉尔书籍的陪伴下长大的,我父亲可以引用这些演讲。

I said, “Did you vote for Churchill?” He said, “Oh good lord, no.” I said, “Why?

我说:“你投票给丘吉尔了吗?”他说:“天哪,不。”我说:“为什么?

I thought you were a great admirer of his.” He said, “Look, on the issue that mattered most to me in life, he was an unreconstructed imperialist.

我以为你是他的崇拜者。”他说:“看,在我生命中最重要的问题上,他是一个顽固的帝国主义者。

A vote for Labour was a vote for Indian independence.

投票给工党就是投票给印度独立。

A vote for Churchill was a vote for the continuation of the empire.” That, again, is why their friends were all socialists.

投票给丘吉尔就是投票给帝国的延续。”这又是为什么他们的朋友都是社会主义者的原因。

On the Bengali intelligentsia

论孟加拉知识分子

COWEN

Why do you think the Bengali intelligentsia has been so especially left-wing?

您认为为什么孟加拉知识界如此特别左翼?

Is there a reason?

有理由吗?

ZAKARIA

Oh, the Bengali intelligentsia.

哦,孟加拉知识分子。

The Bengali intelligentsia was the great intelligentsia of India, probably the most literate, the most learned.

孟加拉知识分子是印度伟大的知识分子,可能是最有文化、最有学问的。

I think it’s because they’re very clever.

我认为这是因为他们非常聪明。

One of the things I’ve always noticed is that people who are very clever political elites tend to think that they should run the economy because they can do it better than the market.

我一直注意到的一件事是,非常聪明的政治精英往往认为他们应该管理经济,因为他们可以比市场做得更好。

Milton Friedman used to say that there are two groups of people who don’t like the free market.

米尔顿·弗里德曼曾经说过,有两类人不喜欢自由市场。

Academics, intellectuals because they think they can do it better than the market, and businessmen because they don’t like competition.

学者、知识分子,因为他们认为自己可以比市场做得更好,商人,因为他们不喜欢竞争。

What they really want — this is a variation of the Peter Thiel argument — what they all really want is to be monopolists.

他们真正想要的是——“这是彼得泰尔论点的变体”——“他们真正想要的是成为垄断者。

That former part is, I think, what explains the Bengali intellectuals.

我认为前一部分可以解释孟加拉知识分子。

By the way, many of the policy intellectuals of India in the ’50s and ’60s, who were very much socialists, were brilliant.

顺便说一句,印度 50 年代和 60 年代的许多政策知识分子都是非常出色的社会主义者。

This is not a case of stupid people.

这不是愚蠢的人的情况。

They were all educated at places like Berkeley and the London School of Economics and Harvard.

他们都在伯克利、伦敦经济学院和哈佛大学等地接受过教育。

We see the same phenomenon now, when you watch the Biden administration putting in all these rules about chip making and things like that.

现在,当你看到拜登政府制定有关芯片制造之类的所有规则时,我们会看到同样的现象。

They think they can figure out the direction the economy is going in, the way it should be guided.

他们认为自己能够弄清楚经济的发展方向以及经济的引导方式。

I think that the reality is, the market is much more powerful than they are in these areas.

我认为现实是,市场在这些领域比他们强大得多。

To give you one simple example, they decided, “Okay, we need to be making high-end chips.” Who do they bet on?

举一个简单的例子,他们决定:“好吧,我们需要制造高端芯片。”他们赌谁?

They bet on Intel, a company that has failed miserably to compete with TSMC, the great Taiwanese chip manufacturer.

他们押注于英特尔,这家公司在与台湾芯片制造商台积电的竞争中惨败。

Intel is now getting multi-billion-dollar grants from the United States government, from the European Union, because it fills all the categories that you’re looking for: big company, stable and well-run, in some sense, can guarantee a lot of jobs.

英特尔现在正在从美国政府、欧盟获得数十亿美元的资助,因为它满足了你所寻找的所有类别:大公司,稳定且运营良好,从某种意义上说,可以保证大量就业机会。

But of course, the reality is that chip making is so complicated.

但当然,现实是芯片制造是如此复杂。

The future of chip making seems to be moving to companies like Nvidia and AMD and Micron, leaving Intel far behind.

芯片制造的未来似乎正在转向英伟达、AMD 和美光等公司,将英特尔远远抛在了后面。

Intel had lost the last war and got rewarded for its failure by being given a check by the US government, saying try again, and now it seems failing in this next war.

英特尔在上一场战争中失败了,并因失败而得到了美国政府的奖励,并说再试一次,现在它似乎在下一场战争中失败了。

Who knew that, actually, it’s Nvidia, whose chips turned out to be designed for gaming, turned out to be ideal for artificial intelligence?

谁知道,实际上是英伟达,它的芯片原来是为游戏而设计的,却是人工智能的理想选择?

That’s a perfect example of how the Hayekian market signals that come bottom-up are much more powerful than a political elite who tries to tell you what it is.

这是一个完美的例子,说明了自下而上的哈耶克市场信号比试图告诉你它是什么的政治精英要强大得多。

But to answer your question, political elites love the idea that political elites get to direct the economy.

但要回答你的问题,政治精英喜欢政治精英指导经济的想法。

On religious experience

论宗教体验

COWEN

What did you learn from the Anglican Book of Common Prayer?

你从英国圣公会公祷书中学到了什么?

ZAKARIA

I went to a high Anglican school in India until 12th grade.

我在印度的一所英国圣公会高中读到十二年级。

We’d start every morning singing a hymn, reciting a prayer out of the Book of Common Prayer.

每天早上我们都会唱一首赞美诗,背诵《公祷书》中的祈祷文。

I learned probably two things.

我大概学到了两件事。

One was a reverence for tradition, and in particular, I loved the hymnal.

一是对传统的尊重,特别是我喜欢赞美诗。

I think Britain’s great contribution to music is religious music.

我认为英国对音乐的伟大贡献是宗教音乐。

It doesn’t have anything to compete with the Germans and the Italians in opera and things like that.

在歌剧之类的方面,它没有什么可以与德国人和意大利人竞争的。

Religious music, I think the Brits and the English have done particularly well.

宗教音乐,我认为英国人和英国人做得特别好。

The second thing I would say is an admiration for Christianity for its extraordinary emphasis on being nice to people who have not been lucky in life.

我要说的第二件事是对基督教的钦佩,因为它非常强调善待生活中不幸运的人。

I would say that’s, to me, the central message of Christianity that I take, certainly from the Sermon on the Mount, and it’s imbued through the Book of Common Prayer: to be nice to the people who have been less fortunate than you.

我想说,对我来说,这就是我从登山宝训中学到的基督教的核心信息,它也通过公祷书渗透其中:善待那些比你不幸的人。

Be nice to poor people.

对穷人好一点。

Recognize that in God’s kingdom, the first shall be last and the last shall be first.

认识到在神的国度里,最先的将是最后的,最后的将是最先的。

There is an enormous emphasis on the idea that those things that make you powerful in this world are not the things that really matter, that your dignity as a human being doesn’t come from that.

人们非常强调这样一种观点:那些让你在这个世界上变得强大的东西并不是真正重要的东西,你作为一个人的尊严也不是来自于此。

I think that’s a very powerful idea.

我认为这是一个非常强大的想法。

It’s a very revolutionary idea.

这是一个非常革命性的想法。

Tom Holland has a very good book about this.

汤姆·赫兰德(Tom Holland)有一本关于这方面的好书。

He’s a wonderful historian in Britain.

他是英国一位出色的历史学家。

I think it’s called Dominion.

我想这就是所谓的统治。

COWEN

Yes, he’s been a guest.

是的,他是客人。

ZAKARIA

Yes.

是的。

He points out what a revolutionary idea this was.

他指出这是一个多么革命性的想法。

It completely upended the Roman values, which were very much, the first shall be first.

它完全颠覆了罗马的价值观,即“先到先得”。

The powerful and the rich are the ones to be valued.

有权势和富有的人才是值得重视的人。

He points out, here is this Jewish preacher coming out of the Middle East saying, “No, the first shall be last, the last shall be first in the kingdom of heaven.”

他指出,这位来自中东的犹太传教士说:“不,在天国里,最先的将是最后的,最后的将是最先的。”

COWEN

Do you think you picked up an anti-clerical side from Singh at all?

你认为你从辛格那里继承了反教权的一面吗?

ZAKARIA

Yes, I think I’ve always liked the more radical Protestant, which is, actually, also the more radical Sunni idea in Islam, that people should have an individual relationship with God.

是的,我想我一直喜欢更激进的新教,实际上,这也是伊斯兰教中更激进的逊尼派思想,即人们应该与上帝建立个人关系。

That the intermediaries seem to exist to exert power and are often corrupt and often distort the message.

中间人的存在似乎是为了行使权力,而且经常腐败并经常扭曲信息。

Yes, and I still believe that.

是的,而且我仍然相信这一点。

I think that one of the most sickening things to look at in America is these televangelists who take advantage of ordinary people and their faith.

我认为在美国最令人作呕的事情之一就是这些电视布道者利用普通人和他们的信仰。

Clearly, to me, they seem to have constructed an elaborate and deeply corrupt racket out of the whole thing.

显然,在我看来,他们似乎从整件事中精心策划了一个极其腐败的骗局。

COWEN

I went to Amritsar the year before, and it was one of the most magical feelings I’ve ever had in any place.

我前一年去了阿姆利则,这是我在任何地方经历过的最神奇的感觉之一。

I’m still not sure what exactly I can trace it to — I am not a Sikh, of course.

我仍然不确定我到底可以追溯到什么 —— 当然,我不是锡克教徒。

But what, for you, accounts for the strong, powerful, wondrous feeling one gets from that place?

但是,对你来说,是什么解释了人们从那个地方得到的强烈、有力、奇妙的感觉呢?

ZAKARIA

It’s a very good question because I also have that feeling.

这是一个很好的问题,因为我也有这样的感觉。

I think it might explain, for example, Amritsar is the most important place for the Sikh religion and has a beautiful temple.

我认为这可以解释,例如,阿姆利则是锡克教最重要的地方,并且有一座美丽的寺庙。

It’s called the Golden Temple.

它的名字叫金殿。

When Indira Gandhi, as prime minister, stormed it because there were a group of separatists who had holed up there — that really is what triggered enormous, enormous pain and anger in the Sikh community, which eventually led to her assassination.

当英迪拉·甘地(Indira Gandhi)担任总理时,因为有一群分裂分子躲在那里而对它进行了猛烈攻击,这确实引发了锡克教社区巨大的痛苦和愤怒,最终导致她被暗杀。

I bring that up only to emphasize your point that it has a special magical feeling for Sikhs.

我提出这一点只是为了强调你的观点,即它对锡克教徒有一种特殊的神奇感觉。

I think there’s something about it architecturally, which is that there is a serenity about it.

我认为它在建筑上有一些东西,那就是它有一种宁静。

Sometimes you can find Hindu temples that are very elaborate.

有时您会发现非常精致的印度教寺庙。

Sikhism is a kind of offshoot of Hinduism.

锡克教是印度教的一个分支。

The Hindu temples can be very elaborate, but very elaborate and ornate.

印度教寺庙可以非常精致,但是非常精致和华丽。

This somehow has a simplicity to it.

这在某种程度上很简单。

When you add to that the water — I’ve always thought that water adds an enormously calming effect.

当你添加水时 —— 我一直认为水会带来极大的镇静效果。

It’s something about that combination, I think, but I’m just speculating.

我认为这与这种组合有关,但我只是猜测。

COWEN

What languages did you grow up speaking?

你是用什么语言长大的?

ZAKARIA

Hindi and Urdu more than anything else.

印地语和乌尔都语比其他任何东西都重要。

Hindi and Urdu are two Indian languages, very related.

印地语和乌尔都语是两种印度语言,非常相关。

They both have roughly the same grammatical structure, but then Hindi derives its vocabulary entirely from Sanskrit, or almost entirely from Sanskrit, and Urdu derives its vocabulary almost entirely from Persian.

它们的语法结构大致相同,但印地语的词汇完全来自梵语,或几乎完全来自梵语,而乌尔都语的词汇几乎完全来自波斯语。

Urdu is a language of Indian Muslims and is the official language for Pakistan.

乌尔都语是印度穆斯林的语言,也是巴基斯坦的官方语言。

It’s a beautiful language, very lyrical, very much influenced by that Persian literary sensibility.

这是一种美丽的语言,非常抒情,深受波斯文学情感的影响。

If you’re speaking one of the languages, there’s a way to alternate between both, which a lot of Indian politicians used to do as a way of signaling a broad embrace of both the Hindu and the Muslim communities.

如果你说其中一种语言,有一种方法可以在两种语言之间交替使用,许多印度政客过去常常这样做,以此来表示广泛接受印度教和穆斯林社区。

Nehru, India’s first prime minister, used to often do that.

印度首任总理尼赫鲁曾经经常这样做。

He would say, “I am delighted to be coming here to your home.” He’d repeat the word home, first in Urdu, then in Hindi, so that in effect, both constituencies were covered.

他会说:“我很高兴来到你家。”他会重复“家”这个词,首先用乌尔都语,然后用印地语,这样实际上两个选区都被覆盖了。

Modi, by contrast, India’s current prime minister, is a great Hindu nationalist.

相比之下,印度现任总理莫迪是一位伟大的印度教民族主义者。

He takes pains almost never to use an Urdu word when he speaks.

他说话时几乎不使用乌尔都语单词。

He speaks in a kind of highly Sanskritized Hindi that most Indians actually find hard to understand because the everyday language, Bollywood Hindi, is a mixture of Hindi words and Urdu words, so there are Persian and Sanskrit origins.

他说的是一种高度梵语化的印地语,大多数印度人实际上很难理解这种语言,因为日常语言宝莱坞印地语是印地语和乌尔都语单词的混合体,因此有波斯语和梵语的起源。

But for Modi and for people of his ilk in the BJP — his party — it’s very important to “cleanse the language Hindi from foreign influences.” That is why they will speak a very Sanskritized Hindi.

但对于莫迪和印度人民党(他的政党)中的同类人士来说,“清除印地语免受外国影响”非常重要。这就是为什么他们会说非常梵语化的印地语。

COWEN

Even that you grew up speaking Urdu, your connection with Singh, who was born in what is now Pakistan — how much, if at all, do you have an aesthetic longing for what used to be called historic India?

即使你是讲乌尔都语长大的,你与出生在现在的巴基斯坦的辛格也有联系——你对过去被称为历史悠久的印度有多少审美渴望,如果有的话?

I don’t mean in an imperialistic kind of way, but just, there was something proper about the fact that it was all connected.

我的意思并不是以帝国主义的方式,而是说,这一切都是相互关联的,这是正确的。

Is that in your thought much at all?

你有很多这样的想法吗?

ZAKARIA

Yes, it’s funny.

是的,这很有趣。

I don’t think I’ve ever written this, so I’m not quite sure how you picked that up, but absolutely.

我想我从来没有写过这个,所以我不太确定你是怎么想到的,但绝对是这样。

I’ll give you a simple example.

我给你举一个简单的例子。

Look, I think the partition of India was a complete travesty.

听着,我认为印度的分裂完全是一场嘲讽。

It was premised on this notion of religious nationalism.

它是以宗教民族主义观念为前提的。

It was horrendously executed.

它被可怕地处决了。

The person who drew the lines, a man named Radcliffe, had never been to India.

划定界限的人名叫拉德克利夫,他从未去过印度。

He’d never been east of the Suez and was given this task, and he did it in a month or two, probably caused a million-and-a-half to two million lives lost, maybe 10 million people displaced.

他从未去过苏伊士运河以东,却被赋予了这项任务,而他在一两个月内就完成了,可能导致一百五十万人丧生,可能导致一千万人流离失所。

It broke that wonderfully diverse, syncretic aspect of India.

它打破了印度奇妙的多元化、融合性的一面。

If you look at cities like Delhi and Lahore, what was beautiful about them is that they mix together all the influences of India: Hindu, Muslim, Punjabi, Sindhi.

如果你看看像德里和拉合尔这样的城市,它们的美妙之处在于它们融合了印度的所有影响:印度教、穆斯林、旁遮普语、信德语。

Now what you have is much more bifurcated.

现在你所拥有的更加分裂了。

If you go to Lahore, Lahore is a Muslim city in Pakistan, and it has a Punjabi influence.

如果你去拉合尔,拉合尔是巴基斯坦的一个穆斯林城市,它受到旁遮普语的影响。

Delhi has become, essentially, much more Indian and Hindu and has lost that Muslim influence.

从本质上讲,德里已经变得更加印度化和印度化,并且失去了穆斯林的影响力。

To me, as somebody who really loves cosmopolitanism and diversity, it’s sad to see that.

对我来说,作为一个真正热爱世界主义和多样性的人,看到这一点很难过。

It’s almost like you’ve lost something that really made these places wonderfully rich.

就好像你失去了一些真正让这些地方变得异常富裕的东西。

I feel the same way when you read about the history of Europe.

当你读到欧洲的历史时,我也有同样的感觉。

You think of a place like Vienna, which, in its most dazzling moment, was dazzling precisely because it was this polyglot population of people coming from all over the Habsburg Empire.

你会想到像维也纳这样的地方,它在最耀眼的时刻之所以令人眼花缭乱,正是因为它是来自哈布斯堡帝国各地的多语言人口。

A large segment of it was Jewish, and it had, as a result — think about Freud and Klimt and the music that came out of there, and the architecture that came out at the turn of the 19th century.

其中很大一部分是犹太人,因此,它思考了弗洛伊德和克里姆特以及从那里产生的音乐,以及 19 世纪之交出现的建筑。

And it’s all gone.

一切都消失了。

It’s like, at this point, a somewhat beautiful but slightly dull Austrian city.

此时,它就像一座有点美丽但又有点沉闷的奥地利城市。

COWEN

You feel Mumbai is still the most cosmopolitan part of current India?

您认为孟买仍然是当今印度最国际化的地区吗?

ZAKARIA

Yes, by far.

是的,到目前为止。

Mumbai is definitely the most cosmopolitan part, and it still has a lot of cosmopolitanism because India still has a lot of Muslims in India, even though the Muslim majority areas ended up being Pakistan, Bangladesh.

孟买绝对是最国际化的地区,而且它仍然有很多国际化的地方,因为印度仍然有很多穆斯林,尽管穆斯林占多数的地区最终是巴基斯坦、孟加拉国。

But there’s a very substantial minority — around 10 percent, which in Indian terms — maybe 12 percent — it’s about 180 million Muslims, which makes it, I think, the third- or fourth-largest Muslim country in the world.

但有一个非常大的少数民族——“大约10%,按印度的说法”——“也许是12%”——大约有1.8亿穆斯林,我认为,这使其成为世界上第三或第四大穆斯林国家。

COWEN

Why do you think Indian Muslims have not radicalized so much?

您认为为什么印度穆斯林没有那么激进?

Or at least it seems that way to me, as an outsider.

或者至少对我这个局外人来说是这样。

ZAKARIA

No, you’re 100 percent right, they have not radicalized at all.

不,你百分百正确,他们根本没有激进化。

George W.

乔治·W.

Bush used to say — and it’s basically true — that it’s extraordinary to see a population of 150-plus million Muslims living right next to Pakistan, right next to Afghanistan, and there was not a single known member of al-Qaida.

布什曾经说过,“这基本上是真的”,看到 1.5 亿多穆斯林人口生活在巴基斯坦旁边、阿富汗旁边,而且没有一个已知的基地组织成员,这是非同寻常的。

I think there are now maybe a handful of members of ISIS who’ve been found to have been Indian Muslims.

我认为现在可能有少数伊斯兰国成员被发现是印度穆斯林。

But given the scale of almost 200 million Muslims, the fact that there are, at most, five or ten who belong to these radical terrorist groups is extraordinary.

但考虑到穆斯林人口近两亿的规模,这些激进恐怖组织的成员最多只有五到十人,这一事实是非同寻常的。

It’s not even that; they don’t vote for Muslim parties.

甚至不是那样;他们不投票给穆斯林政党。

In general, they vote for the Congress Party, which is a secular party.

一般来说,他们投票给国大党,这是一个世俗政党。

They don’t, even in their voting — forget terrorism — they don’t even vote for specifically Muslim or Islamic fundamentalist parties.

他们甚至在投票时也没有——“忘记恐怖主义”——他们甚至不投票给特定的穆斯林或伊斯兰原教旨主义政党。

COWEN

Why is that, though?

但这是为什么呢?

ZAKARIA

I think it’s the kind of, again, the syncretic nature of India, that India has always been diverse.

我认为这又是印度的融合本质,印度一直是多元化的。

Hinduism is very tolerant.

印度教是非常宽容的。

It’s a kind of unusual religion in that you can believe in one god and be Hindu.

这是一种不寻常的宗教,因为你可以信仰一个神并成为印度教徒。

You can believe in 300.

你可以相信300。

You can be vegetarian and believe that’s a religious dictate.

你可以吃素,并相信这是宗教规定。

You can be nonvegetarian and believe that that’s completely compatible with your religion.

您可以是非素食主义者,并相信这与您的宗教信仰完全兼容。

It’s always embraced almost every variant and variation.

它总是包含几乎所有的变体和变化。

I think, in a sense, Islam fit in within that tapestry very easily, and it’s been around for a while.

我认为,从某种意义上说,伊斯兰教很容易融入到这个挂毯中,而且它已经存在了一段时间了。

When people talk about cleansing India, Hindu nationals talk about cleansing India of foreign influences.

当人们谈论净化印度时,印度教国民谈论的是净化印度的外国影响。

Islam has been in India since the 11th century, so it’s been around for a long time.

伊斯兰教从11世纪就已经在印度存在了,所以它已经存在了很长时间。

People, I think, feel comfortable and don’t feel the need to assert that distinctive identity by voting in a parochial way.

我认为,人们感觉很舒服,并且觉得没有必要通过狭隘的方式投票来维护这种独特的身份。

Some of that is changing, and I worry about it because there is much more sustained persecution of Muslims these days in India, but I still think, in many ways, India is a wonder of this.

其中一些正在发生变化,我对此感到担忧,因为如今印度对穆斯林的迫害更加持续,但我仍然认为,在很多方面,印度都是一个奇迹。

There’s nothing quite like it, no country quite like it.

没有什么比得上它,没有一个国家比得上它。

There are 15 official languages, and those are real languages, languages with thousands of years of literature and poetry.

有15种官方语言,这些都是真正的语言,具有数千年文学和诗歌的语言。

These are not dialects.

这些不是方言。

They have 400 dialects in India.

印度有 400 种方言。

Yet there’s something that unifies the country, almost geographically, civilizationally.

然而,有一些东西几乎在地理上、文明上将这个国家团结起来。

On being good at politics

论善于政治

COWEN

Fast-forwarding a bit, what did you learn debating at the Yale Political Union?

快进一点,你在耶鲁政治联盟的辩论中学到了什么?

ZAKARIA

Oh, I had great fun.

哦,我玩得很开心。

I learned more than anything else, honestly, how to do politics because the Yale Political Union was like a mini parliament, but there were political parties, and you had to make alliances.

老实说,我学到的最重要的是如何从政,因为耶鲁政治联盟就像一个小型议会,但有政党,你必须结成联盟。

You had to, especially if you were trying to rise up there.

你必须这样做,特别是如果你想爬到那里。

I became president my sophomore year, which was pretty fast.

我大二那年就成为了总统,速度相当快。

You had to be very good at politics.

你必须非常擅长政治。

I discovered — if I can be totally honest — I was very good at politics, but it scared me.

我发现 —— 如果我能完全诚实的话 —— 我非常擅长政治,但这让我感到害怕。

I did not like the person I became in doing it.

我不喜欢我因这样做而变成的人。

You have to be pretty ruthless, pretty expedient.

你必须非常无情,非常权宜之计。

You have to make alliances.

你必须结成联盟。

I wouldn’t say you have to be deceptive, but you have to do a little bit of overpromising and switching horses when it seems necessary.

我并不是说你必须欺骗,但你必须做出一些过度承诺,​​并在必要时改变立场。

I don’t know if I decided this consciously, but I think one of the reasons I’m a journalist and not an active participant is that I saw what it does to you as a person, and I didn’t love that.

我不知道我是否有意识地做出了这个决定,但我认为我作为一名记者而不是一名积极参与者的原因之一是我看到了它对你作为一个人的影响,但我不喜欢那样。

I was very good at it, I will boastfully say.

我会自豪地说,我非常擅长。

COWEN

There was, I think, a 2003 piece in New York Magazine.

我想,《纽约杂志》2003 年曾发表过一篇文章。

I know you know it.

我知道你知道。

This suggested you might someday be secretary of state.

这表明您有一天可能会成为国务卿。

Now, this was never you saying that, but when that came out, no one laughed.

现在,这从来不是你说的,但当这句话说出来时,没有人笑。

Today, that would be unthinkable because our politics is somehow crazier.

今天,这是不可想象的,因为我们的政治在某种程度上更加疯狂。

What did you think in 2003 when you heard people thought you could someday be secretary of state?

2003 年,当您听到人们认为您有一天可以成为国务卿时,您有何感想?

ZAKARIA

I was enormously flattered, obviously.

显然,我受宠若惊。

I didn’t myself think that that was a likely scenario because I had already begun to see a shift that had taken place.

我自己并不认为这是一种可能的情况,因为我已经开始看到已经发生的转变。

If you look back to when Nixon appointed Kissinger national security adviser, Kissinger had barely — he had been a consultant to the Kennedy administration.

如果你回顾一下尼克松任命基辛格国家安全顾问时,基辛格几乎没有——他一直是肯尼迪政府的顾问。

He had really been an academic, and Nixon had been attracted to him for two reasons.

他确实是一位学者,尼克松被他吸引有两个原因。

One, he had read his Foreign Affairs articles, mostly in Foreign Affairs.

第一,他读过他的外交文章,大部分是在《外交》上。

Two, he knew that Kissinger advised Nelson Rockefeller, and Nixon had a little bit of that envy of the Eastern establishment.

第二,他知道基辛格是纳尔逊·洛克菲勒的顾问,​​而尼克松对东方当权派有一点嫉妒。

When Carter appointed Brzezinski, Brzezinski was a famous academic, again, had never held a government job.

当卡特任命布热津斯基时,布热津斯基是一位著名的学者,但他从未担任过政府职务。

There was something about the Cold War which made people think the stakes were so high, you had to find the most brilliant person you could, or something like that.

冷战让人们认为赌注如此之高,你必须找到你能找到的最聪明的人,或者类似的东西。

In the last 30 or 40 years, the trend has moved much further away from that, and much more toward loyalty, toward people who have been supporting you, who have been on your team, who have worked on your campaign.

在过去的 30 或 40 年里,这种趋势已经远离了这一点,并且更多地转向忠诚度,转向那些一直支持你、在你的团队中、为你的竞选活动工作过的人。

I’ve never wanted to do that.

我从来不想那样做。

I’ve never done that.

我从来没有这样做过。

I always thought that that was people who are using an old standard, which is, “Here’s this guy who writes really interesting stuff on foreign policy.

我一直认为那些人使用的是旧标准,即“这个人在外交政策方面写了非常有趣的东西。

Maybe he’s going to hold high government office.” I don’t think people like me are asked to do that kind of thing anymore.

也许他会担任高级政府职务。”我认为像我这样的人不会再被要求做那样的​​事情了。

It’s a separate question as to whether I’d do it.

至于我是否会这样做,这是一个单独的问题。

I have been asked to serve in government several times but never at that level.

我曾多次被邀请在政府任职,但从未达到过这个级别。

I’ve never really wanted to do it because I’ve realized it’s a version of what I was saying to you about the Yale Political Union.

我从来没有真正想要这样做,因为我意识到这就是我对你们所说的耶鲁政治联盟的一个版本。

I’m not a very good courtier, and you have to be a courtier if you’re going to serve.

我不是一个很好的朝臣,如果你要侍奉,你就必须是一个朝臣。

You lose your own voice.

你失去了自己的声音。

You have to take on the voice of the principal, the president, and you have to be a good team player.

你必须代表校长、总裁的声音,你必须成为一名优秀的团队合作者。

I’ve always liked my own independence, my own voice, and so, even though I was flattered at times when I’d be offered these things, it never quite made sense to me.

我一直喜欢自己的独立性,自己的声音,因此,尽管有时当有人向我提供这些东西时我感到受宠若惊,但这对我来说从来都没有多大意义。

I always found some excuse.

我总是找一些借口。

Economists have a wonderful phrase, revealed preferences.

经济学家有句绝妙的话:显示偏好。

After about the third time I was offered something, when I turned it down, I realized to myself, “You know what?

大约第三次有人向我提供某种东西后,当我拒绝它时,我对自己意识到:“你知道吗?

My revealed preference is, I do not want to go into government.”

我透露的偏好是,我不想进入政府。”

COWEN

At the Yale Political Union, who beat you the most often in those debates, if anyone?

在耶鲁政治联盟,谁在这些辩论中最常击败你(如果有的话)?

ZAKARIA

I was pretty good.

我很好。

I had a roommate who was also a member of the Yale Political Union.

我有一个室友,他也是耶鲁大学政治联盟的成员。

I was right of center in those days.

那时我是中间偏右的。

He was left of center, and he was very, very eloquent and very smart.

他处于中间偏左的位置,而且他非常非常能言善辩,而且非常聪明。

His name is David Murphy.

他的名字叫大卫·墨菲。

He then became a partner at Wachtell Lipton, which is literally the leading law firm in the country, the most, most profitable law firm by far.

随后,他成为了 Wachtell Lipton 的合伙人,这家律师事务所实际上是美国领先的律师事务所,也是迄今为止最赚钱的律师事务所。

He now does arbitration, and he’s still a formidable debater.

他现在从事仲裁工作,而且仍然是一位令人敬畏的辩手。

We’re still very much in touch.

我们仍然保持着密切的联系。

Brad Berenson was another person who was very good, who I think served in the Bush White House in the Office of Legal Counsel and then became general counsel to GE.

布拉德·贝伦森(Brad Berenson)是另一个非常优秀的人,我认为他曾在布什政府的法律顾问办公室任职,然后成为通用电气的总法律顾问。

I would say those two more than anyone else.

我比任何人都更愿意说这两个。

COWEN

In these years, if I understand it correctly, you’re viewed very much as a prodigy.

这些年来,如果我没理解错的话,你被视为一个神童。

Did you feel pressure from that?

你是否因此感到压力?

ZAKARIA

No, if I’m being totally honest, I got energized by it.

不,如果我完全诚实的话,我会因此而充满活力。

I felt like I had the wind behind my back.

我感觉背后有风。

I was amazed that America — it wasn’t America; it was where I was at Yale and Harvard and all that — that nobody cared where I came from.

我很惊讶美国——这不是美国;它是美国。这就是我在耶鲁大学和哈佛就读的地方——没有人关心我来自哪里。

Nobody cared.

没人关心。

I remember once being asked when I was a graduate student at Harvard — Tony Lake was then national security adviser, and his office called and said — I’d written something in the New York Times, I think — “Mr. Lake would like you to come to the White House to brief him.”

我记得有一次我在哈佛读研究生的时候被问到——托尼·莱克当时担任国家安全顾问,他的办公室打来电话说——我在《纽约时报》上写过一些东西,我想——“莱克先生希望你到白宫向他通报情况。”

I walked in and there were five people around the table: Tony Lake; Deputy National Security Advisor Sandy Berger; George Stephanopoulos, who was then director of communications at the White House; Joe Nye, who was a senior professor at Harvard; one other person; and myself.

我走进去,桌子周围有五个人:托尼·莱克(Tony Lake);副国家安全顾问桑迪·伯杰;乔治·斯特凡诺普洛斯 (George Stephanopoulos),时任白宫通讯主管;乔·奈(Joe Nye),哈佛大学资深教授;另一个人;和我自己。

And I kept thinking to myself, “Are they going to realize at some point that I’m not an American citizen?

我一直在想,“他们会在某个时候意识到我不是美国公民吗?

They’re asking me for my advice on what America should do, and I am on a student visa.” And of course, nobody ever did, which is one of the great glories of America.

他们向我征求关于美国应该做什么的建议,而我持有学生签证。”当然,从来没有人这样做过,这是美国的伟大荣耀之一。

On Walter Isaacson

关于沃尔特·艾萨克森

COWEN

What did you learn from Walter Isaacson?

你从沃尔特·艾萨克森身上学到了什么?

ZAKARIA

Walter, when I first got to know him, was just a great journalist who had written this book, The Wise Men.

当我第一次认识沃尔特时,他只是一位伟大的记者,写了《智者》这本书。

One of my funny social faux pas — I met him at a cocktail party at Harvard at a student group, which he belonged to when he was at Harvard and then I belonged to as a grad student, called the Signet Society.

我的一个有趣的社交失态是——我在哈佛大学的一个学生团体的鸡尾酒会上认识了他,他在哈佛时就加入了这个团体,然后我作为研究生加入了这个团体,这个团体被称为“印章协会”。

We were chatting about books, and somehow The Wise Men came up, and I puffed myself up as a graduate student and said, “Oh, I just reviewed that book for the American Scholar, the magazine of the Phi Beta Kappa.” I said, “I just reviewed that book.” He looked at me, and he said, “Yes, and I wrote it.” I learned from him — you know, more than anything else, Walter had this wonderful ambition.

我们正在谈论书籍,不知怎的,《智者》出现了,我以研究生的身份自夸说:“哦,我刚刚为美国学者杂志(Phi Beta Kappa 的杂志)评论了那本书。”我说:“我刚刚评论了那本书。”他看着我,说:“是的,我写的。”我从他身上学到了——你知道,最重要的是,沃尔特有这个伟大的抱负。

I say wonderful because he was a journalist, but he decided he was going to write this book about American foreign policy, about the group of people after World War II who really charted the course of American foreign policy, charted the course of the American century.

我说精彩是因为他是一名记者,但他决定写这本关于美国外交政策的书,关于二战后一群真正描绘了美国外交政策进程、描绘了美国世纪进程的人。

Then he decides to write a biography of Henry Kissinger.

然后他决定写一本亨利·基辛格的传记。

Then he decides to write a book about Einstein.

然后他决定写一本关于爱因斯坦的书。

I think, particularly when you’re trained as an academic, as I was, you get into silos and you think to yourself, “Well, I only know about this one thing.” Walter has this amazing breadth about him, where he’s willing to take on anything — Leonardo da Vinci — and he pulls it off.

我认为,特别是当你像我一样接受过学者培训时,你会陷入孤岛,你会对自己说:“好吧,我只知道这一件事。”沃尔特有着惊人的广度,他愿意承担任何事情——“列奥纳多·达·芬奇”——并且他成功了。

The books are amazing, I think, that sense of that breadth of ambition I’ve always loved.

我认为这些书太棒了,我一直很喜欢那种雄心勃勃的感觉。

COWEN

Yes, I like the Leonardo book.

是的,我喜欢莱昂纳多的书。

Now, you write your dissertation under Huntington, right?

现在,你在亨廷顿的指导下写论文,对吗?

ZAKARIA

Correct.

正确的。

COWEN

What was your thesis topic, and how did you choose it?

您的论文主题是什么?您是如何选择的?

ZAKARIA

I’ll be totally honest.

我会完全诚实。

My thesis topic was, I tried to answer the question, when countries rise in great power, when they rise economically, they become great powers because they quickly translate that economic power into diplomatic and military power.

我的论文题目是,我试图回答这个问题,当国家崛起时,当它们经济崛起时,它们就会成为大国,因为它们很快将经济实力转化为外交和军事实力。

What explains the principal exception in modern history, which is the United States?

如何解释现代历史上的主要例外——美国?

The United States by 1880, by most measures, had overtaken Britain as the leading industrial power in the world, but if you looked at its army, its navy, its diplomatic representation, and the number of embassies it had around the world, it ranked 20th in the world.

从大多数标准来看,到 1880 年,美国已经超过英国,成为世界领先的工业强国,但如果你看看它的陆军、海军、外交代表以及在世界各地拥有的大使馆数量,它在世界上排名第 20 位。

I think it had many, many fewer foreign outposts than Italy.

我认为它的外国前哨基地比意大利少得多。

It had a smaller army than most European nations.

它的军队规模比大多数欧洲国家都要小。

So, what explained this massive delay in America rising politically and diplomatically and militarily?

那么,是什么解释了美国在政治、外交和军事上崛起的巨大延迟呢?

My simple answer was that the United States was a very unusual creature in the modern world.

我的简单回答是,美国是现代世界中一个非常不寻常的生物。

It was a very strong nation with a very weak state.

这是一个非常强大的国家,但国家却非常弱小。

The federal government in the United States did not have the capacity to extract the resources from the society at large because you didn’t have income taxes in those days.

美国联邦政府没有能力从整个社会提取资源,因为当时没有所得税。

You still had the state militia systems, where the federal troops — it was not that easy, particularly in the shadow of the Civil War, for the federal government to raise troops.

仍然有州民兵系统,其中有联邦军队——联邦政府筹集军队并不容易,特别是在内战的阴影下。

There were all these obstacles to America translating its national power into state power that could be used.

美国将其国家力量转化为可以使用的国家力量存在着种种障碍。

Now, the reason I did it was, partly I was fascinated by it.

现在,我这样做的原因部分是因为我对它着迷。

Paul Kennedy had been my adviser at Yale, and he had been writing The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, his great tome at the time.

保罗·肯尼迪曾是我在耶鲁大学的顾问,他当时正在撰写《大国的兴衰》,这是他当时的巨著。

The second reason I did it was I wanted to get a job in academia.

我这样做的第二个原因是我想在学术界找到一份工作。

And this conformed to certain academic fashions at the time about testing hypotheses and testing various theories of realpolitik, called realism and classical realism and defensive realism, all of which I now look back with a certain amount of regret because I think it added unnecessary theoretical layers to what was actually a very elegant historical thesis.

这符合当时关于检验假设和检验各种现实政治理论的某些学术时尚,称为现实主义、古典现实主义和防御现实主义,所有这些现在我带着一定的遗憾回顾,因为我认为它为实际上非常优雅的历史论文添加了不必要的理论层次。

Look, I was an immigrant kid.

看,我是一个移民孩子。

I wanted a job, and so part of the point was to write it in the style that would get me a job, and it succeeded.

我想要一份工作,所以重点是以能让我找到工作的风格来写它,而且它成功了。

I think it would’ve succeeded at that.

我认为它会成功的。

It was a well-regarded dissertation; it got published by Princeton.

这是一篇广受好评的论文;它由普林斯顿出版。

But by then, I decided to move away from academia.

但那时我决定离开学术界。

COWEN

What put you off academia?

是什么让你远离学术界?

And this was for the better, in my view.

在我看来,这是为了更好。

ZAKARIA

I think two things.

我认为有两件事。

One, I could see that political science was moving away from the political science that I loved, which was a broad discipline rooted in the social sciences but also rooted in the humanities, which was rigorous, structural, historical comparisons.

第一,我可以看到政治学正在远离我所喜爱的政治学,政治学是一门广泛的学科,植根于社会科学,但也植根于人文学科,是严格的、结构性的、历史的比较。

Looking at different countries, trying to understand why there were differences.

观察不同的国家,试图理解为什么存在差异。

It was moving much more toward a huge emphasis on things like rational choice, on game theory There was an economist envy.

它更加注重理性选择、博弈论等事物,这引起了经济学家的羡慕。

Just as economists have math envy, political scientists have economist envy.

正如经济学家羡慕数学一样,政治科学家也羡慕经济学家。

It was moving in that direction.

它正在朝那个方向发展。

Whether it was the right direction or not, it was not something I felt like I would thrive in.

无论这个方向是否正确,我都觉得这不是我会茁壮成长的事情。

The second piece of it was actually very much related to Huntington.

第二件事其实和亨廷顿有很大关系。

Sam Huntington was quite an extraordinary character, probably the most important social scientist in the second half of the 20th century.

萨姆·亨廷顿是一位非同寻常的人物,可能是 20 世纪下半叶最重要的社会科学家。

Huge contributions to several fields of political science.

对政治学的多个领域做出了巨大贡献。

He lived next to me.

他住在我旁边。

Me, obviously in a tiny graduate student apartment, but he in a townhouse on Beacon Hill.

我显然住在一间狭小的研究生公寓里,但他住在灯塔山的一栋联排别墅里。

I would sometimes talk to him.

我有时会和他说话。

We’d have coffee in the mornings.

我们早上喝咖啡。

He had a routine, which is, he’d get up about 6:00 a.m.

他有一个惯例,就是早上 6:00 左右起床。

He’d go down to the basement of his townhouse, and at 6:30, he would start writing or working on whatever his next big research project was.

他会到联排别墅的地下室,在 6:30 开始写作或研究他的下一个大型研究项目。

He’d do that, uninterrupted, for three hours at least, sometimes four.

他会不间断地这样做,至少三个小时,有时四个小时。

Then, at about 9:30, 10:00, he would take the subway to Harvard.

然后,大约在9:30、10:00,他会乘坐地铁前往哈佛。

His point was, you got to start the day by doing the important work of academia, which is producing knowledge.

他的观点是,你必须从学术界的重要工作开始新的一天,即生产知识。

All the rest of it — teaching, committee meetings, all that — you can do later.

剩下的一切————教学、委员会会议,所有这些————你可以稍后再做。

He was so disciplined about that, that every five years or so, he put out another major piece of work, another major book.

他对此非常自律,每隔五年左右,他就会推出另一部重要作品,另一部重要著作。

I looked at that, and I said to myself, I do not have the self-discipline to perform at that level.

我看着那个,我对自己说,我没有自律能力来达到那个水平。

I need to go into something that has deadlines, that has structure, that has more feedback because, as you know well, Tyler, there’s a very lonely aspect to being an academic.

我需要研究一些有截止日期、有结构、有更多反馈的事情,因为泰勒,你很清楚,作为一名学者有一个非常孤独的方面。

There’s a lot of fun, and there’s lots of interesting things, but a lot of it is just sitting by yourself.

有很多乐趣,有很多有趣的事情,但很多只是你一个人坐着。

In the new Leonard Bernstein movie, there’s a point at which Bradley Cooper says — I’m guessing this comes out of a Bernstein interview, where he was asked what’s the difference between being a conductor and a composer — he says, “Well, being a performer, you have a constant relationship with the outside world.

在伦纳德·伯恩斯坦的新电影中,布莱德利·库珀说:“我猜这来自伯恩斯坦的一次采访,当他被问到作为指挥家和作曲家之间有什么区别时,他说,“嗯,作为一名表演者,你与外界有着持续的关系。

You have a grand outer life, a life directed outward.

你有一个宏伟的外在生活,一个向外导向的生活。

But as a composer, as a creator, you only have a grand internal life.”

但作为作曲家、创作者,你只有宏大的内心生活。”

It’s all within you, and you have to be able to generate ideas from that lonely space.

这一切都在你的内心,你必须能够从那个孤独的空间中产生想法。

I’ve always found that hard.

我一直觉得这很难。

For me, writing books is the hardest thing I do.

对我来说,写书是我所做的最困难的事情。

I feel like I have to do it because I feel as though everything else is trivia — the television, column, everything else.

我觉得我必须这样做,因为我觉得其他一切都是琐事——电视、专栏,其他一切。

I think it’s important, but it’s relatively — in my conception, in my hierarchy, it’s trivia.

我认为这很重要,但它是相对的——在我的观念中,在我的等级制度中,它是琐事。

The most important thing you can do is to try and write books that make a difference, that put new ideas into the world, but it’s the hardest thing for me.

你能做的最重要的事情就是尝试写一些有所作为的书,将新的想法带入世界,但这对我来说是最难的事情。

On editing Foreign Affairs

关于编辑外交事务

COWEN

By age 28 now, you’re editor of the journal Foreign Affairs, which, especially then, was extremely important.

现在 28 岁了,您已成为《外交》杂志的编辑,该杂志在当时尤其重要。

How did that happen?

这是怎么发生的?

ZAKARIA

Really, luck.

真的,运气。

I was having lunch with Walter Isaacson.

我正在和沃尔特·艾萨克森共进午餐。

This just shows you serendipity in life.

这只是向你展示了生活中的机缘巧合。

I was having lunch with Walter Isaacson in New York, and I was telling him that Sam Huntington had offered me an assistant professorship at Harvard.

我当时正在纽约与沃尔特·艾萨克森共进午餐,我告诉他萨姆·亨廷顿为我提供了哈佛大学助理教授的职位。

There was an institute that Sam ran, and he had told me he thought he could create an assistant professorship that was half-time teaching, half-time assistant director of that institute, and I was thrilled about it.

萨姆经营着一家研究所,他告诉我他认为他可以设立一个助理教授职位,担任该研究所的半职教学、半职助理主任,我对此感到非常兴奋。

Walter says to me, “Well, I don’t know that you should really go into academia.

沃尔特对我说:“好吧,我不知道你真的应该进入学术界。

There’s this job out there, the managing editor of Foreign Affairs, and the editor-in-chief is much older.

那里有一份工作,《外交事务》的总编辑,主编年纪要大得多。

He’s a real journalist.

他是一名真正的记者。

You would balance him out really well.

你会很好地平衡他。

You should try and get that job.” I remember telling him, “Walter, didn’t you hear me?

你应该尝试得到那份工作。”我记得我告诉他:“沃尔特,你没听到我说话吗?

I think I’m going to get to be an assistant professor at Harvard.” He looks at me and says, “Did you hear what I just told you?

我想我会成为哈佛大学的助理教授。”他看着我,说道:“你听到我刚才说的话了吗?

I think you could be managing editor of Foreign Affairs.”

我认为你可以担任《外交事务》的总编辑。”

I realized that we were both totally socialized by our respective careers.

我意识到我们都因各自的职业而完全社交化。

In graduate school, you’re on a conveyor belt, and the end of the conveyor belt is becoming a great professor, and what better place to start than Harvard?

在研究生院,你在传送带上,传送带的末端正在成为一名伟大的教授,还有什么地方比哈佛更好呢?

In journalism, the idea of being managing editor by the time you’re 28 is .

在新闻业,28 岁时成为总编辑的想法是。

.

。

.

。

Each of us was reflecting our biases and our silos.

我们每个人都在反映我们的偏见和孤岛。

But I went home and I realized I’d really always loved journalism.

但我回到家后,我意识到我真的一直很喜欢新闻业。

I’d started a magazine when I was in high school.

我在高中时创办了一本杂志。

I’d been the editor of the Yale political monthly.

我曾是耶鲁大学政治月刊的编辑。

Every summer job I’d ever had, I worked at a magazine or a newspaper because I found them fun.

我做过的每个暑期工作,我都会在杂志或报纸工作,因为我发现它们很有趣。

Again, revealed preferences telling you more than what you say to yourself.

再次强调,显露的偏好告诉你的不仅仅是你对自己说的话。

So, I called him up and said, “Yes, throw my hat in the ring.” Then I discovered it was very tough because I was 28, and everybody else who was being interviewed was 45-plus.

所以,我打电话给他说:“是的,把我的帽子扔到擂台上吧。”然后我发现这非常艰难,因为我 28 岁,而其他接受面试的人都在 45 岁以上。

They had much more experience than I did.

他们的经验比我丰富得多。

I had to really hustle to be viable, but without that lunch with Walter, it wouldn’t have happened.

我必须非常努力才能生存,但如果没有和沃尔特共进午餐,这一切就不会发生。

On the clash of civilizations

论文明的冲突

COWEN

Was it you who commissioned Samuel Huntington’s very famous “Clash of Civilizations” essay?

是您委托塞缪尔·亨廷顿撰写了著名的《文明的冲突》论文吗?

ZAKARIA

Yes.

是的。

I didn’t commission it.

我没有委托它。

What happened is, I went to Sam and told him I was going to take this job at Foreign Affairs, which he was completely opposed to.

实际情况是,我去找萨姆,告诉他我将接受外交部的这份工作,但他完全反对。

My three advisers all advised me against taking the job.

我的三位顾问都建议我不要接受这份工作。

I realized that the reason was, they were all great academics.

我意识到原因是,他们都是伟大的学者。

Within the world of academia, the way you gain fame and influence is by having great proteges, by having great students who then go on to become great academics.

在学术界,获得名声和影响力的方法是拥有优秀的门生,拥有优秀的学生,然后他们会成为伟大的学者。

They all thought that my going would be a great loss to academia, but also a loss to their legacy.

他们都认为我的离开将是学术界的巨大损失,也是他们遗产的损失。

Sam very much felt that I shouldn’t take the job, so I said to him, “I am going to do it, but can I ask a favor?

Sam 非常觉得我不应该接受这份工作,所以我对他说:“我愿意做,但是我能帮个忙吗?

You sent me a draft of an essay you’ve been writing, for my comments, a few months ago, called ‘The Clash of Civilizations.’ Can I take that with me to Foreign Affairs and publish it?” That’s how it became, so I took it with me.

几个月前,你给我寄了一篇你一直在写的文章草稿,供我评论,文章名为《文明的冲突》。我可以把它带到外交部并发表吗?事情就是这样,所以我就把它带走了。

We edited it, and we made it the first-time-ever lead essay.

我们对其进行了编辑,并将其设为有史以来第一篇主文。

Foreign Affairs had never had a lead essay before.

《外交事务》以前从未有过主文。

The typeface was all the same.

字体都是一样的。

We redesigned the magazine, and we made this the clear cover essay.

我们重新设计了杂志,并将其作为清晰的封面文章。

COWEN

In a world where we have a major war with Russia attacking Ukraine, significant conflict in the Sudan, ongoing conflict in Congo — several million lives killed there — you think that essay is still correct?

在我们与俄罗斯发生重大战争、攻击乌克兰、苏丹发生重大冲突、刚果持续冲突——“数百万人丧生”的世界里,你认为这篇文章仍然正确吗?

Because those are very significant conflicts, and they’re not really cross-civilizational.

因为这些都是非常重大的冲突,而且它们并不是真正的跨文明冲突。

They’re within particular groups.

他们属于特定群体。

ZAKARIA

I think he got one thing very powerfully right, which is that at the end of the Cold War, where ideology was the core motivational factor behind much of the conflict of the Cold War — whether you were communist or capitalist, whether you were allied with the communist or the democratic world, whether you were a proxy for — those were the battle lines of the mid-20th century.

我认为他说得非常正确,那就是在冷战结束时,意识形态是冷战大部分冲突背后的核心动机因素——“无论你是共产主义还是资本主义,无论你是与共产主义还是民主世界结盟,无论你是……的代理人——这些都是20世纪中叶的战线”。

Once that went away, what people were going to revert to was their identity, and their identity often rooted in religion.

一旦这种情况消失,人们就会回归到他们的身份,而他们的身份往往植根于宗教。

If you think about the rise of al-Qaida, the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, you think about the return of a certain kind of Chinese nationalism in China — I think that piece of it — you look at the rise of Hindu nationalism in India — he really understood that people were going to fall back on these older, descriptive identities in a way that they had not during the Cold War.

如果你想到基地组织的崛起,伊斯兰原教旨主义的兴起,你就会想到某种中国民族主义在中国的回归 ——“我认为其中的一部分”——“你看看印度教民族主义在印度的兴起”——“他真的明白,人们将会以一种冷战期间没有的方式回归到这些古老的、描述性的身份认同上。”

What I think he got wrong was, international relations is fundamentally a struggle for power, and that a lot of those power struggles — it’s not that they are motivated by things that are completely contradictory to identity politics, but they sometimes match up and they sometimes don’t.

我认为他错了,国际关系从根本上来说是一场权力斗争,而且很多权力斗争并不是因为与身份政治完全矛盾的事物而激发的,而是它们有时匹配,有时不匹配。

Many of the wars in the Arab world have been Arab on Arab, Muslim on Muslim.

阿拉伯世界的许多战争都是阿拉伯人对阿拉伯人、穆斯林对穆斯林的战争。

When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, he was invading another fellow Arab, fellow Sunni state.

当萨达姆·侯赛因入侵科威特时,他正在入侵另一个阿拉伯同胞、逊尼派国家。

As you point out, a number of the African conflicts are, essentially, you’d have to say, conflicts within civilizations.

正如你所指出的,你不得不说,许多非洲冲突本质上是文明内部的冲突。

Some of the conflicts are ones where people find odd bedfellows so that the Chinese and the Russians are allying, even though, in a sense, they’re two different civilizations.

在一些冲突中,人们找到了奇怪的伙伴,因此中国和俄罗斯结盟,尽管从某种意义上来说,它们是两个不同的文明。

There’s a long history of this.

这有很长的历史。

Richelieu, when he was running France, the great Catholic power, allied routinely with Protestant powers.

黎塞留在统治法国这个天主教大国时,经常与新教势力结盟。

Power politics sometimes transcends identity politics.

权力政治有时超越身份政治。

I think he missed that, but it’s still a very powerful and thought-provoking essay, I think.

我认为他错过了这一点,但我认为这仍然是一篇非常有力且发人深省的文章。

COWEN

After 9/11 in 2001, you wrote a famous essay for Newsweek, “Why Do They Hate Us?” You talked about the rulers, failed ideas, religion.

2001 年 9/11 事件后,您为《新闻周刊》写了一篇著名的文章,“他们为什么恨我们?”你谈到了统治者、失败的想法、宗教。

If you were to revise or rethink that piece today, how would you change it?

如果你今天要修改或重新思考那篇文章,你会如何改变它?

Because we have 23 more years of data, right?

因为我们还有 23 年的数据,对吧?

ZAKARIA

Yes.

是的。

Not very much, honestly.

老实说,不是很多。

The central point I was making in that essay was that if you look at the Arab world, it is the principal outlier in the modern era, where it has undergone almost no political modernization.

我在那篇文章中提出的中心点是,如果你看看阿拉伯世界,你会发现它是现代时代的主要异类,它几乎没有经历过政治现代化。

If you looked at Latin America in 1970 versus 2000, you would have seen a sea change, where it was mostly dictatorships in 1970 and was mostly democracies by 2001.

如果你看看 1970 年与 2000 年的拉丁美洲,你会看到巨大的变化,1970 年主要是独裁国家,到 2001 年主要是民主国家。

If you looked at, obviously, Central Europe — totally transformed from communist to liberal democracies.

如果你观察一下,显然,中欧已经从共产主义民主国家彻底转变为自由民主国家。

Even if you looked at Africa, you would’ve seen enormous transition.

即使你看看非洲,你也会看到巨大的转变。

The Arab world had remained absolutely static.

阿拉伯世界完全保持静止状态。

My argument was that it was largely because of the curse of oil and oil wealth, which had impeded modernization.

我的观点是,这很大程度上是因为石油和石油财富的诅咒阻碍了现代化。

But along with that, because of that failed modernization, they had developed this reactionary ideology of Islam, which said the answer is to go further back, not to go forward.

但与此同时,由于现代化的失败,他们发展了这种反动的伊斯兰教意识形态,认为答案是向后退,而不是前进。

“Islam is the solution,” was the cry of the Islamic fundamentalists in the 1970s.

“伊斯兰教是解决方案”,这是 20 世纪 70 年代伊斯兰原教旨主义者的呼声。

The problem that they were saying that Islam is a solution to was the failed modernization, the failed Westernization of these countries.

他们所说的伊斯兰教是解决这些国家失败的现代化、失败的西化的问题。

That toxic mixture was at the heart of what was producing armed reactionary ideologies like al-Qaida and things like that.

这种有毒混合物是产生基地组织等武装反动意识形态的核心。

I really do feel very proud of that essay, but you’re absolutely right that we have 23 more years of data.

我确实对这篇文章感到非常自豪,但你说得对,我们还有 23 年的数据。

What’s interesting is that, partly because of 9/11, which I think in some ways was a great wake-up call, what you have seen is a much greater effort by elites to modernize the societies, not simply to buy a modernity by buying Western goods, but to find ways to actually modernize the society.

有趣的是,部分是因为 9/11(我认为这在某些方面是一个巨大的警钟),你所看到的是精英们为实现社会现代化付出了更大的努力,不仅仅是通过购买西方商品来购买现代化,而是找到真正实现社会现代化的方法。

From all the stuff going on in Saudi Arabia right now, which is, yes, there’s a lot of economic bringing golf and other sports in, but there’s opening up the lives of women, allowing them to be educated, ending the segregation, allowing (famously) them to drive.

从沙特阿拉伯现在发生的所有事情来看,是的,高尔夫和其他运动带来了很多经济增长,但也开放了女性的生活,允许她们接受教育,结束种族隔离,允许她们开车(众所周知)。

And Saudi Arabia, in a way, was at the heart of this problem because it is the richest country and, in many ways, sent the signal of what kind of modernization was compatible with Islam and what was not.

从某种程度上来说,沙特阿拉伯是这个问题的核心,因为它是最富有的国家,并且在很多方面发出了信号,表明什么样的现代化与伊斯兰教相容,什么不相容。

I think that in a way you’ve seen more forward movement in the last 20 years than people realize, even though the regimes have largely stayed dictatorships.

我认为,在某种程度上,过去 20 年里你看到的进步比人们意识到的要多,尽管这些政权在很大程度上仍然是独裁政权。

But that tension still exists, by the way.

但顺便说一句,这种紧张局势仍然存在。

Egypt is a very brutal country because, again, it has fundamentally failed to modernize.

埃及是一个非常残酷的国家,因为它从根本上未能实现现代化。

COWEN

I’ve been surprised how well some of the Gulf nations have done since, say, 2001.

自 2001 年以来,一些海湾国家的表现让我感到惊讶。

If we look at Iran, which has really not done so well, if you had to explain in as fundamental a model as possible .

如果我们看看伊朗,如果你必须用尽可能基本的模型来解释的话,它确实做得不太好。

.

。

.If you see Iranians abroad, they earn high incomes, they have real science, they have real technology.

如果你在国外看到伊朗人,他们收入很高,他们拥有真正的科学,他们拥有真正的技术。

There’s some degree of national unity in a way maybe you wouldn’t find, say, in Iraq.

某种程度的民族团结也许是你在伊拉克等地找不到的。

But what’s the fundamental thing at its core holding back Iran?

但阻碍伊朗发展的根本核心是什么?

ZAKARIA

I think it’s a very similar version of what we were just talking about.

我认为这与我们刚才讨论的版本非常相似。

It’s oil wealth coupled with —

这是石油财富加上 ——

COWEN

But UAE has made the transition.

但阿联酋已经实现了转变。

Why isn’t Iran like UAE?

为什么伊朗不像阿联酋那样?

ZAKARIA

To begin with, those Gulf states — it’s important to remember — are tiny.

首先,那些海湾国家——“重要的是要记住——”都很小。

You’re talking about a million or two people in Qatar.

你说的是卡塔尔有一百万或两个人。

I think you’re talking about maybe 400,000 people.

我想你说的可能是 400,000 人。

It’s much easier for an elite to dominate and rule those places.

对于精英来说,统治和统治这些地方要容易得多。

There’s a reason why Saudi Arabia was more difficult.

沙特阿拉伯的处境更加困难是有原因的。

Saudi Arabia, it’s the one real country, by which I mean real population size.

沙特阿拉伯,这是一个真正的国家,我指的是真实的人口规模。

That’s why, in a way, what MBS is doing has been more difficult.

这就是为什么从某种程度上来说,MBS 正在做的事情变得更加困难。

You’ve got to measure the population’s reaction to things.

你必须衡量人们对事物的反应。

Iran is a big country, bigger than all of them.

伊朗是一个大国,比所有国家都大。

I think that between the oil wealth and the failed modernization, where the Shah went to .

我认为,在石油财富和失败的现代化之间,国王去了哪里。

.

。

.

。

In my current book, I talk about this.

在我当前的书中,我谈到了这一点。

Iran strikes me very much like the French Revolution, where the Shah tried to move much too far, much too fast, much too disruptively — triggered an enormous backlash, which they’re still living with now.

伊朗给我的印象很像法国大革命,国王试图走得太远、太快、太具有破坏性——引发了巨大的反弹,他们现在仍然忍受着这种反弹。

You add to that the oil wealth, which makes it easy to not modernize.

再加上石油财富,很容易不实现现代化。

To just remind people what the problem with oil wealth is, it means you don’t have to modernize your economy.

只是提醒人们石油财富的问题是什么,这意味着你不必实现经济现代化。

You don’t have to modernize your society because you can get enormous wealth just by drilling holes in the ground — actually by paying other people to drill holes in the ground.

你不必使你的社会现代化,因为你只需在地上钻孔就可以获得巨大的财富——实际上是通过付钱给其他人在地上钻孔。

Mostly Western technology is used to extract those resources.

主要使用西方技术来提取这些资源。

So you never get through the painful process of actually modernizing your society, and many of these countries are in that situation.

因此,你永远无法经历真正实现社会现代化的痛苦过程,而许多国家都处于这种情况。

As I said, the Gulf states are so unusual, and it’s not an accident that the most modern of the Gulf cities is Dubai, the one city that has no oil.

正如我所说,海湾国家是如此不寻常,最现代化的海湾城市是迪拜这个没有石油的城市,这并非偶然。

Oil is 10 percent of Dubai’s GDP.

石油占迪拜 GDP 的 10%。

It’s about 90 percent of Abu Dhabi’s.

大约占阿布扎比的 90%。

Even there, you see that variation.

即使在那里,你也能看到这种变化。

The thing that needs explaining is why is Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar — and maybe Saudi — worked, not why do the other ones not work — because the other ones are all like Nigeria, like Venezuela, the oil-rich countries that have never made it.

需要解释的是,为什么迪拜、阿布扎比和卡塔尔——或许还有沙特——起作用了,而不是为什么其他国家不起作用——因为其他国家都像尼日利亚、委内瑞拉一样,都是石油资源丰富的国家,但从未成功过。

There are these small exceptions, and they’re all very small.

有一些小的例外,而且它们都很小。

They’re run by very forward-leaning absolute monarchs who have enormous power and can exercise that power because they have a tiny population.

他们由非常具有前瞻性的绝对君主统治,他们拥有巨大的权力,并且可以行使这种权力,因为他们的人口很少。

COWEN

You had a famous interview with Lee Kuan Yew, the theme being culture is destiny.

您对李光耀进行了一次著名的采访,主题是文化就是命运。

Now, Singapore has done very well since then.

现在,新加坡自那时起就表现得非常好。

Do you think that is because of their culture?

你认为这是因为他们的文化吗?

Why hasn’t Singapore become more corrupt?

为什么新加坡没有变得更加腐败?

ZAKARIA

Yes, I don’t.

是的,我不知道。

Lee Kuan Yew clearly did.

李光耀显然做到了。

I think it’s a perfect example of they had very good leadership, and they institutionalized some of their best practices in a way that made a huge difference.

我认为这是他们拥有非常出色的领导力的一个完美例子,他们将一些最佳实践制度化,从而产生了巨大的影响。

For example, why they are not corrupt is because Lee Kuan Yew thought long and hard about this problem, and he decided that he was going to create a system of bureaucracy in Singapore, which was that they get paid close to market wages.

比如说他们为什么不腐败,是因为李光耀对这个问题思考了很久,他决定在新加坡建立一个官僚体系,让他们的工资接近市场工资。

A cabinet minister in Singapore makes about $1.5 million.

新加坡内阁部长的年薪约为 150 万美元。

Senior civil servant makes about a million dollars at the highest level, and it permeates.

高级公务员的最高薪水约为一百万美元,而且这种收入渗透到各个阶层。

They do it in a very rigorous process, where they essentially benchmark against a company like McKinsey or things like that.

他们通过非常严格的流程来做到这一点,基本上以麦肯锡等公司或类似公司为基准。

Of course, you don’t make the same amount, but the idea is that you should be able to make the kind of money that allows you to live a good life, send your kids to schools and colleges, afford healthcare, have a good retirement, so that all those things that tend to be temptations to be corrupt, you don’t need to do because if you just do your job well, you’re going to .

当然,你赚的钱不一样,但我们的想法是,你应该能够赚到足够的钱,让你过上美好的生活,送你的孩子上学和大学,负担得起医疗费用,享受美好的退休生活,这样所有那些往往会诱惑腐败的事情,你就不需要做,因为如果你只要做好你的工作,你就会这么做。

.

。

.

。

It’s a perfect example of how there’s nothing cultural about it.

这是一个完美的例子,说明它与文化无关。

There are Chinese bureaucracies in China, and there are a lot of very smart people, but they’re super corrupt.

中国有中国的官僚机构,有很多非常聪明的人,但他们超级腐败。

There are Chinese businessmen in Indonesia, and they’re very corrupt.

印尼有华商,他们非常腐败。

But Singapore managed, through the structure of its system and its laws, to do it.

但新加坡通过其制度结构和法律成功做到了这一点。

Now, to be fair, Lee Kuan Yew would argue that there’s some part of this that is the Chinese Mandarin tradition of trusting bureaucrats and stuff, but I’ve never bought the cultural argument.

现在,公平地说,李光耀会辩称,这其中有一部分是中国普通话的传统,即信任官僚之类的东西,但我从来不相信这种文化论点。

If you look at Max Weber in his book on capitalism, The Protestant Spirit, he basically said the two cultures that are inimical to growth, that are going to be our obstacle to growth, were Catholicism and Confucianism.

如果你看看马克斯·韦伯在他关于资本主义的书《新教精神》中,他基本上说,两种不利于增长、将成为我们增长的障碍的文化是天主教和儒教。

If you look at Spain and Italy over the last 40 years, they’ve grown pretty darn fast, in fact, somewhat faster than some of the larger countries in the North.

如果你看看过去 40 年的西班牙和意大利,它们的增长速度相当快,事实上,比北方一些较大的国家要快一些。

If you look at Confucianism — of course, now people say it’s the Confucian ethic that has propelled China forward.

如果你看儒家思想——当然,现在人们说是儒家伦理推动了中国的前进。

The same is true of India.

印度也是如此。

It used to be that people talked about the Hindu growth rate, meaning the low growth rate in the 1950s and ’60s, and now they say there’s something about Indian culture that actually is very pro-entrepreneurial.

过去人们谈论的是印度教增长率,即 20 世纪 50 年代和 60 年代的低增长率,现在他们说印度文化实际上非常支持创业。

I think that culture is a very big grab bag.

我认为文化是一个非常大的袋子。

When you see success or failure, you can always dip into that bag and find something that explains either the failure or the success.

当你看到成功或失败时,你总是可以翻开那个袋子,找到一些可以解释失败或成功的东西。

On returning to classical liberalism

论回归古典自由主义

COWEN

I’m struck that this year, both you and Ruchir Sharma have books coming out — again, Fareed’s book is Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present — that I would describe broadly as classically liberal.

令我惊讶的是,今年你和鲁奇尔·夏尔马 (Ruchir Sharma) 都有书出版了 ——法里德的书又是《革命时代:从 1600 年至今的进步与反弹》——我将其广泛地描述为古典自由主义。

Do you think classical liberalism is making a comeback?

您认为古典自由主义正在卷土重来吗?

Or is it just being plowed under by progressivism, wokeism, Trumpism, illiberalism, nationalism?

或者它只是被进步主义、唤醒主义、特朗普主义、非自由主义、民族主义所践踏?

Or are you leading a new trend?

或者你正在引领新趋势?

ZAKARIA

I wish I were leading a new trend, but I don’t think I am.

我希望我能引领一种新趋势,但我不这么认为。

I think the reason these books are coming out — and certainly, mine, as you know, is centrally occupied with the problem that there’s a great danger that we are going to lose this enormous, probably the most important thing that’s happened in the last 500, 600 years in human history, this movement that has allowed for the creation of modern liberal democratic societies with somewhat market economies.

我认为这些书出版的原因——当然,如你所知,我的书主要关注这样一个问题:我们将面临着巨大的危险,即我们将失去人类历史上过去 500、600 年发生的这一巨大的、可能是最重要的事情,这场运动使得建立具有一定市场经济的现代自由民主社会成为可能。

If you look at the graph of income, of GDP, per capita GDP, it’s like a straight line.

如果你看一下收入、GDP、人均GDP的图表,它就像一条直线。

There’s no improvement until you get to about, roughly speaking, the 17th, 18th century in Europe, and then you see a sharp uptick.

粗略地说,直到 17、18 世纪的欧洲,这种情况才会有任何改善,然后你就会看到急剧上升。

You see this extraordinary rise, and that coincides with the rise of science and intellectual curiosity and the scientific method, and the industrial revolution after that.

你会看到这种非凡的崛起,这与科学、求知欲和科学方法的兴起以及随后的工业革命同时发生。

All that was a product of this great burst of liberal Enlightenment thinking in the West.

所有这一切都是西方自由主义启蒙思想伟大爆发的产物。

I fear that that whole project is now under threat because of all the forces you described: populism from the right and the left, dictatorships and authoritarian regimes that want to manipulate it to serve their purposes.

我担心整个项目现在正受到威胁,因为你所描述的所有力量:来自右翼和左翼的民粹主义、独裁政权和独裁政权想要操纵它来服务于他们的目的。

Part of the reason is it’s just been so successful, that it is producing change and transformation — economically and socially and even personally and psychologically — on a scale that is so disruptive and so troubling to people that they search for solutions.

部分原因是它是如此成功,以至于它正在产生变化和转变——“经济上、社会上,甚至个人和心理上”——其规模是如此具有破坏性,对人们来说如此令人不安,以至于他们寻求解决方案。

If you think about what we’ve gone through in the last 30 years — and this is really the central argument in my book — massive expansion of globalization, massive expansion of information technology so that it has completely upended the old economy.

如果你想想我们在过去30年所经历的事情 ——这确实是我书​​中的中心论点 ——全球化的大规模扩张,信息技术的大规模扩张,以至于它彻底颠覆了旧经济。

All of this happening, and people are overwhelmed, and they search in that age of anxiety.

这一切的发生,让人们不知所措,在那个焦虑的年代里寻找。

They search for a solution, and the easy solutions are the ones offered by the populists.

他们寻找解决方案,而最简单的解决方案就是民粹主义者提供的解决方案。

They’re deeply anti-liberal, illiberal.

他们是极度反自由主义、非自由主义的。

So, I worry that, actually, if we don’t cherish what we have, we’ll lose what has been one of the great, great periods of progress in human history.

所以,我担心,实际上,如果我们不珍惜我们所拥有的,我们就会失去人类历史上最伟大、最伟大的进步时期之一。

COWEN

What’s the most surprising thing you learned writing this book?

写这本书时你学到的最令人惊讶的事情是什么?

ZAKARIA

One surprising thing that you maybe knew, Tyler, that I didn’t was that the left-right divide that we talk about — it came about as an accident.

泰勒,你可能知道但我不知道的一件令人惊讶的事情是,我们谈论的左右分歧——它的产生是一次意外。

If you think to yourself, why do we speak of people being left-wing and right-wing and left of center and right of center?

如果你想一想,为什么我们说人们是左翼和右翼,中间偏左和中间偏右?

It’s because during the French Revolution — actually just before the French Revolution — there was a National Assembly chamber in which people used to sit according to their status, whether they were commoners, whether they were priests, whether they were aristocrats.

因为在法国大革命期间——其实就在法国大革命之前——有一个国民议会的议事厅,人们按照身份来坐在里面,无论是平民,无论是牧师,还是贵族。

That was the division.

这就是分裂。

As the debate turned into a debate about the preservation of the French monarchy, the people who wanted to preserve the monarch tended to cluster on the right of the presiding officer’s chair, and the people who wanted to get rid of the monarchy tended to gather on the left.

当辩论变成关于保留法国君主制的辩论时,想要保留君主制的人往往聚集在主持者椅子的右侧,而想要摆脱君主制的人则倾向于聚集在左边。

Then this architect, Pierre-Adrien Pâris, designs a new chamber for the National Assembly, which becomes a rectangular box in which there is literally a right side and a left side, and all the people who wanted to preserve the monarchy would congregate on the right and the people — naturally, this was not by requirement — and all the people who wanted to upend the monarchy were on the left.

然后这位建筑师皮埃尔-阿德里安·帕里斯为国民议会设计了一个新的会议厅,它变成了一个长方形的盒子,里面实际上有一个右侧和一个左侧,所有想要保留君主制的人都会聚集在右边,而人民——“当然,这不是必需的”——而所有想要颠覆君主制的人都在左边。

That is how you came up with left-wing and right-wing, which I’ve always thought is a wonderful example of sometimes in history you have these serendipities which then have a very long and powerful effect.

这就是你如何提出左翼和右翼的,我一直认为这是一个很好的例子,在历史上有时你会得到这些偶然的机会,然后产生非常长期和强大的影响。

COWEN

Why does your book cover the 17th-century Dutch Golden Age?

您的书为何涵盖 17 世纪荷兰黄金时代?

ZAKARIA

The Dutch are the first modern country.

荷兰是第一个现代国家。

If you think about politics before that — certainly with the exception of ancient Greece and Rome — in modern history, the Dutch invent modern politics and economics.

如果你想想之前的政治——“当然除了古希腊和罗马之外”——在现代历史中,荷兰人发明了现代政治和经济。

They invent modern politics in the sense that it’s the first time politics is not about courts and kings.

他们发明了现代政治,因为这是政治第一次与宫廷和国王无关。

It is about a merchant republic with powerful factions and interest groups and political parties, or the precursor to political parties.

它讲述的是一个拥有强大派系、利益集团和政党的商业共和国,或者说是政党的前身。

It’s the beginning of modern economics because it’s economics based not simply on land and agriculture, but on the famous thing that John Locke talked about, which is mixing human beings’ labor with the land.

这是现代经济学的开端,因为它的经济学不仅基于土地和农业,而且基于约翰·洛克谈到的著名的事情,即将人类的劳动与土地混合在一起。

The Dutch literally do this when they reclaim land from the sea and find ways to manage it, and then invent tall ships, which is, in some ways, one of the first great technological revolutions that has a direct economic impact.

荷兰人确实做到了这一点,他们从海洋中开垦土地,找到管理土地的方法,然后发明高大的船只,从某些方面来说,这是最早对经济产生直接影响的伟大技术革命之一。

You put all that together, and the Dutch — they become the richest country in the world, and they become the leading technological power in the world.

把所有这些加在一起,荷兰人——他们成为世界上最富有的国家,他们成为世界领先的技术力量。

It was very important to me to start the story — because they are really the beginnings of modern liberalism.

对我来说,开始这个故事非常重要——因为它们确实是现代自由主义的开端。

And I should be clear, when I say liberalism, I mean classical liberalism, liberalism as in often pertaining to human liberty.

我应该明确的是,当我说自由主义时,我指的是古典自由主义,通常与人类自由有关的自由主义。

COWEN

Circa 1800, how large were the Chinese and Indian economies?

1800年前后,中国和印度的经济规模有多大?

ZAKARIA

This is one of those highly misleading statistics that certainly the Chinese and Indians often use, but it tells you very little.

这是中国人和印度人经常使用的极具误导性的统计数据之一,但它告诉你的信息很少。

Circa 1800, the Chinese and Indian economies are the two largest economies in the world, and people have taken this to mean, oh, the West had a temporary spurt because of colonies and cheap energy, and that the Chinese and Indians are just coming back to where they were.

大约在1800年,中国和印度经济是世界上最大的两个经济体,人们认为这意味着,哦,西方因为殖民地和廉价能源而暂时繁荣起来,而中国人和印度人刚刚回到原来的状态。

First of all, the statistic is misleading because in those days, GDP was simply measured by using population.

首先,这个统计数据具有误导性,因为当时GDP只是用人口来衡量的。

All society was agricultural.

整个社会都是农业社会。

The more people you had, the larger your GDP.

人口越多,GDP 就越大。

It was meaningless because the state could not extract that GDP in any meaningful way, and it’s meaningless because it doesn’t measure progress.

它毫无意义,因为国家无法以任何有意义的方式提取GDP,而且它毫无意义,因为它不衡量进展。

It doesn’t measure per capita GDP growth, which is the most important thing to look at.

它没有衡量人均GDP增长,而人均GDP增长才是最重要的。

If you look at per capita GDP growth from 1350 to 1950, for 600 years, India and China have basically no movement.

如果你看从1350年到1950年的人均GDP增长,600年来,印度和中国基本上没有任何动静。

It’s about $600 in 1350 and $600 in 1950.

1350 年约为 600 美元,1950 年约为 600 美元。

The West, by comparison, moves up 600 percent in that period.

相比之下,西方在此期间上涨了 600%。

It’s roughly $500 per capita GDP to roughly $5,000 per capita GDP.

人均 GDP 约为 500 美元至 5,000 美元左右。

You can also look at all kinds of other measures.

您还可以查看各种其他措施。

You can look at diet.

可以看看饮食。

There are economic historians who’ve done this very well, and people in England were eating four to five times as much grain and protein as people in China and India.

有些经济历史学家在这方面做得很好,英国人吃的谷物和蛋白质是中国和印度人的四到五倍。

You can look at the extraordinary flourishing of science and engineering.

你可以看到科学和工程的非凡繁荣。

You can look at the rise of the great universities.

你可以看看伟大大学的崛起。

It’s all happening in the West.

这一切都发生在西方。

The reason this is important is, people need to understand the rise of the West has been a very profound, deep-rooted historical phenomenon that began sometime in the 15th century.

这一点之所以重要,是因为人们需要了解西方的崛起是一个非常深刻、根深蒂固的历史现象,始于15世纪。

The fact that we’re moving out of that phase is a big, big deal.

我们正在走出这个阶段,这一事实是一件非常非常大的事情。

This is not a momentary blip.

这不是一时的昙花一现。

This is a huge train.

这是一列巨大的火车。

The West define modernity.

西方定义了现代性。

Even when countries try to be modern, they are in some way becoming Western because there is no path we know of to modernity without that.

即使当一些国家试图变得现代化时,它们也在某种程度上变得西方化,因为我们知道,如果不这样做,就没有通往现代化的道路。

One other way of just thinking about how silly that statistic is: in pure GDP terms, China had a larger GDP than Britain in 1900.

另一种思考这个统计数据有多么愚蠢的方式是:以纯粹的 GDP 计算,1900 年中国的 GDP 比英国还多。

Now, look at Britain in 1900: the most advanced industrial society in the world, ruling one-quarter of the world, largest navy in the world, was able to humiliate China by using a small fraction of its military power during the opium era.

现在看看1900年的英国:世界上最先进的工业社会,统治着世界四分之一的土地,世界上最大的海军,在鸦片时代却能用一小部分军力羞辱中国。

That’s what tells you that number is really meaningless.

这就是告诉你这个数字实际上毫无意义。

The West has been significantly more advanced than the rest of the world since the 16th century at least.

至少自 16 世纪以来,西方明显比世界其他地区先进。

COWEN

How did you end up writing online wine reviews for Slate?

您是如何为 Slate 撰写在线葡萄酒评论的?

ZAKARIA

Michael Kinsley, who was my first boss at the New Republic, called me up one day and asked me if I would write a foreign affairs column for the new webzine Slate that he was starting with Microsoft.

迈克尔·金斯利 (Michael Kinsley) 是我在《新共和》的第一任老板,有一天,他打电话给我,问我是否愿意为他与微软合作创办的新网络杂志《Slate》撰写外交专栏。

I said to him, “I’d love to, Mike, but I just signed on with Newsweek to write a monthly column on foreign affairs.” He said, “Well, you’ve got to write something for me.

我对他说:“迈克,我很乐意,但我刚刚与《新闻周刊》签约,每月撰写一份有关外交事务的专栏。”他说:“好吧,你必须为我写点东西。

I really want you to be part of this new venture.

我真的希望你能成为这个新事业的一部分。

It’s really important to me.”

这对我来说真的很重要。”

I said, “I tell you what, I could write about something I know about as much as foreign affairs.

我说:“我告诉你,我可以写一些我所了解的事情,就像外交事务一样。

It’s wine, and I’ll try and write it in a way that would be of interest to a non-wine drinker.” That was the mandate I set myself, which is, try to write this in a way that is of interest to somebody who wouldn’t.

这是酒,我会尝试以一种不喝酒的人会感兴趣的方式来写它。”这是我给自己设定的任务,即尝试以一种不感兴趣的人感兴趣的方式来写这篇文章。

I try to answer why is it that the British love Bordeaux wines, and they call them claret.

我试图回答为什么英国人喜欢波尔多葡萄酒,他们称之为波尔多葡萄酒。

Red Bordeaux is called claret.

波尔多红葡萄酒被称为波尔多红葡萄酒。

It’s a very long tradition, and people have often said this is an example of British taste and culture.

这是一个非常悠久的传统,人们经常说这是英国品味和文化的一个例子。

Well, of course, it isn’t.

嗯,当然,事实并非如此。

It’s an example of tariff policies for 400 years.

这是400年来关税政策的一个例子。

When Eleanor of Aquitaine married Henry II in France — for those of you who remember the movie The Lion in Winter with Katharine Hepburn and Peter O’Toole — everything that came out of Bordeaux was tax-free to Britain because of this marriage, because Eleanor of Aquitaine was French and came essentially from Bordeaux, and so all Bordeaux products went to Britain tax-free.

当阿基坦的埃莉诺在法国与亨利二世结婚时——“对于那些还记得凯瑟琳·赫本和彼得·奥图尔主演的电影《冬天的狮子》的人来说”——因为这次婚姻,从波尔多出来的所有东西对英国来说都是免税的,因为阿基坦的埃莉诺是法国人,基本上来自波尔多,所以所有波尔多产品都免税销往英国。

As a result, the British developed an enormous liking for this wine.

结果,英国人对这种酒产生了极大的喜爱。

So, it was a good way of trying to get people who are not interested in wine interested in something about wine.

所以,这是一个让对葡萄酒不感兴趣的人对葡萄酒感兴趣的好方法。

On TV journalism and fame

电视新闻和名气

COWEN

Were your feelings conflicted at all when you started doing TV?

当您开始拍电视时,您的感受是否有矛盾?

Or was it just plain, outright fun, like, “I want to do this.

或者只是简单、纯粹的乐趣,比如“我想做这个。

This is for me.”

这是给我的。”

ZAKARIA

When I started to do it, I was just doing it as a commentator.

当我开始做这件事的时候,我只是做一个评论员。

The main gig I got was, George Stephanopoulos asked me if I would be on the Sunday round table.

我得到的主要工作是,乔治·斯蒂芬诺普洛斯问我是否会参加周日的圆桌会议。

He inherited the show that David Brinkley used to run, and that was fun.

他继承了大卫·布林克利曾经主持的节目,这很有趣。

That was just pure fun.

那只是纯粹的乐趣。

When I started to try to do it myself and do my own show — I had a little show on PBS — that was more difficult, and I had to find a way to come to terms with television because I really fundamentally thought of myself as somebody who was a writer who just happened to occasionally be on television, offering an opinion.

当我开始尝试自己做节目并做自己的节目时——我在 PBS 上做了一个小节目——那就更困难了,我必须找到一种方法来接受电视,因为我从根本上认为自己是一个作家,只是偶尔在电视上发表意见。

If you look at it from that perspective, you can’t but think that television is superficial because if you take my show, which I’m very proud of, but if you took the transcript of my show, it would probably fit on one page of the New York Times.

如果你从这个角度来看,你不能不认为电视是肤浅的,因为如果你看我的节目,我对此感到非常自豪,但如果你看我的节目的文字记录,它可能会适合纽约时报的一页。

That’s just the nature of television.

这就是电视的本质。

What I came to realize, and what I had to get myself to understand, was that the better way to think about television is, it’s like haiku.

我逐渐意识到,也是我必须让自己理解的是,看待电视的更好方式是,它就像俳句。

You have real constraints in terms of time, but if you use those constraints well and powerfully and effectively, you can have a huge impact because you’re hitting people in a place where print doesn’t often hit.

你在时间方面确实受到限制,但如果你很好、有力、有效地利用这些限制,你就可以产生巨大的影响,因为你在印刷品不常受到影响的地方吸引了人们。

So, I now think of the show very much in those terms.

所以,我现在非常从这些角度思考这个节目。

Each segment of my show is about six to seven minutes, and so I say to myself, “I’ve got six minutes with this person.

我的节目每个片段大约六到七分钟,所以我对自己说,“我和这个人有六分钟的时间。

What is it I can do?

我能做什么呢?

What can I extract?

我可以提取什么?

How can I hone this in a way that the audience gets the maximum insight out of it?”

我怎样才能磨练这一点,让观众从中获得最大的洞察力?”

COWEN

The final question.

最后一个问题。

From a great distance, it might seem that you’re one of these people who’s so busy being famous that it just drives you crazy, or you don’t get to do what you want to do in life.

从远处看,你似乎是那些忙于出名的人之一,这只会让你发疯,或者你无法做你一生中想做的事情。

Yet the book is out.

然而书已经出版了。

You’ve done many other things.

你还做了很多其他的事情。

You have an incredible network.

你有一个令人难以置信的网络。

You travel a lot.

你经常旅行。

You enjoy wine and food in a serious way.

您认真地享受美酒和美食。

What’s your own self-account of how that has come to be a good, acceptable, fulfilling life for you, and that you’re not driven crazy by being too busy being famous?

你自己如何看待这对你来说是一种美好的、可以接受的、充实的生活,并且你没有因为太忙于出名而发疯?

Do you know what I’m getting at?

你知道我的意思吗?

ZAKARIA

Yes, very much so.

是的,非常如此。

I would say, first of all, I’m not that famous.

我想说,首先,我没那么出名。

As my kids will often remind me, I’m like a third-tier celebrity.

正如我的孩子们经常提醒我的那样,我就像一个三线名人。

By which I mean, there’s the Brad Pitt world.

我的意思是,这就是布拉德·皮特的世界。

That’s a completely different world.

那是一个完全不同的世界。

Then there’s the Anderson Cooper world.

然后是安德森·库珀的世界。

That’s one level below.

那是低一级。

I’m probably in the third range, where if I’m at an airport, every five or seven minutes, somebody might come up to me and say, “Hey, I like the show.”

我可能处于第三个范围,如果我在机场,每隔五到七分钟,就会有人过来对我说:“嘿,我喜欢这个节目。”

But it doesn’t interfere with my life in any way.

但它不会以任何方式干扰我的生活。

It’s a pleasure to have people.

很高兴有人陪伴。

I’ve almost never had somebody — once or twice — somebody come up and be nasty.

我几乎从来没有遇到过有人 ——“一两次”—— 有人上来对我说脏话。

It’s mostly people are very sweet, they’re nice.

大多数人都很可爱,很好。

Occasionally somebody wants a selfie, but it’s really not very intrusive.

偶尔有人想要自拍,但这其实并不太打扰。

As I said, it’s partly because I’m really not that famous.

正如我所说,部分原因是我真的没那么出名。

Where it does have the impact you’re describing is, I have a lot of opportunities in terms of speeches, visiting places, conferences, people wanting to meet — all of that.

它确实产生了你所描述的影响,那就是,我有很多机会发表演讲、参观地方、参加会议、与想要见面的人——所有这些。

You have to make choices.

你必须做出选择。

That part — managing my time — is one of the most difficult parts of my life.

这部分——“管理我的时间”——是我一生中最困难的部分之一。

I’ve tried to do it well.

我已经尽力做好了。

I’ve tried to do it, most importantly, in a way that I still have a very rich personal life, mostly with my kids but also with my close friends.

最重要的是,我努力做到这一点,让我仍然拥有非常丰富的个人生活,主要是和我的孩子们在一起,也和我的亲密朋友在一起。

I’ve maintained a social network that is mostly the people who are really my friends, not the famous people who invite you on their boat.

我维护着一个社交网络,其中大部分是我真正的朋友,而不是邀请你上船的名人。

I know that that’s not real.

我知道那不是真的。

I know that if I didn’t have my job, I wouldn’t get those invitations.

我知道如果我没有工作,我就不会收到这些邀请。

I’ve tried to stay honest with myself that way and to be enormously grateful and thankful for the opportunities, for the luck that has allowed me to do what I do.

我试图以这种方式对自己保持诚实,并非常感激和感谢这些机会,感谢让我能够做我所做的事情的运气。

Be nice to people, be decent, recognize that I’m in an unusually privileged position, and be the best representation I can of myself.

善待他人,为人正派,认识到自己处于异常优越的地位,并尽我所能最好地代表自己。

I think, more than anything else, probably having kids grounds you in that way because you can have all that other stuff, and it makes no difference.

我认为,最重要的是,拥有孩子可能会让你以这种方式立足,因为你可以拥有所有其他东西,这没有什么区别。

You can be a terrible father.

你可能是一个糟糕的父亲。

I probably spend most of my time .

我可能大部分时间都花在了。

.

。

.

。

when I think and reflect and be self-critical, I want to be sure that I’ve done right by my kids, I’ve done right by my friends.

当我思考、反思和自我批评时,我想确保我对我的孩子、对我的朋友都做得对。

COWEN

Again, Fareed’s new book is Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present.

同样,法里德的新书是《革命时代:从 1600 年至今的进步与反弹》。

Fareed Zakaria, thank you very much.

法里德·扎卡里亚,非常感谢你。

ZAKARIA

Tyler, a huge pleasure.

泰勒,真是太高兴了。

Thank you for having me on.

谢谢你邀请我参加。

Photo Credit: Jeremy P.

照片来源:Jeremy P.

Freeman, CNN

弗里曼,美国有线电视新闻网